RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the primary variable utilized for prognosis following myocardial infarction (MI), it is relatively indiscriminate for survival in patients with mildly reduced (> 40%) or preserved LVEF (> 50%). Improving risk stratification in patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF remains an unmet need, and could be achieved by using a combination approach using prognostically validated measures of left-ventricular (LV) size, geometry, and function. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic utility of a Combined Echo-Score for predicting all-cause (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) following MI to LVEF alone, including the sub-groups with LVEF > 40% and LVEF > 50%. METHODS: Retrospective data on 3094 consecutive patients with MI from 2013 to 2021 who had inpatient echocardiography were included, including both patients with ST-elevation MI (n = 869 [28.1%]) and non-ST-elevation MI (n = 2225 [71.9%]). Echo-Score consisted of LVEF < 40% (2 points) or LVEF < 50% (1 point), and 1 point each for left atrial volume index > 34 mL/m2, septal E/e' > 15, abnormal LV mass-index, tricuspid regurgitation velocity > 2.8 m/s, and abnormal LV end-systolic volume-index. Simple addition was used to derive a score out of 7. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 4.5 years there were 445 deaths (130 cardiac deaths). On Cox proportional-hazards multivariable analysis incorporating significant clinical and echocardiographic predictors, Echo-Score was an independent predictor of both ACM (HR 1.34, p < .001) and CM (HR 1.59, p < .001). Inter-model comparisons of model ð2, Harrel's C and Somer's D, and Receiver operating curves confirmed the superior prognostic value of Echo-Score for both endpoints compared to LVEF. In the subgroups with LVEF > 40% and LVEF > 50%, Echo-Score was similarly superior to LVEF for predicting ACM and CM. CONCLUSIONS: An Echo-Score composed of prognostically validated LV parameters is superior to LVEF alone for predicting survival in patients with MI, including the subgroups with mildly reduced and preserved LVEF. This could lead to improved patient risk stratification, better-targeted therapies, and potentially more efficient use of device therapies. Further studies should be considered to define the benefit of further investigation and treatment in high-risk subgroups.