RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between beliefs about obese people and health-related self-care among overweight and obese people, considering sociodemographic aspects. This study adopted a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 207 participants selected through a simple random sampling method. The "Beliefs About Obese Persons Scale" (BAOP) and the "Self-Care Agency Rating Scale-Revised" (ASA-R) questionnaires were applied to data collection. The results showed that 82.6% believed that obesity is a condition the individual cannot control, and 74.4% expressed inadequate self-care regarding their health. A multivariate analysis found that belonging to the adult age group increases the probability of presenting adequate health-related self-care by 4.7 times (95% CI = 1.892-11.790) compared to older adults. The belief that obesity is an uncontrollable condition increases the probability of inadequate self-care by 6.3 times (95% CI = 2.360-16.924), in contrast to the perception that it is a controllable condition. Moreover, overweight people are 0.139 times (95% CI = 0.044-0.443) less likely to have adequate self-care compared to people with obesity. In conclusion, being an adult and having the belief that obesity is a condition that can be controlled is associated with adequate health-related self-care, while being overweight is associated with inadequate health care.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a new normality, a scenario where different circumstances trigger emotions such as concern about returning to face-to-face classes, to which higher education students adapt. The objective was to identify how emotional intelligence and coping with stress explain students' concern about returning to face-to-face classes post COVID-19. Methods: This was an explanatory and cross-sectional study. The sample by intention was 588 students from the Faculty of Health Sciences. The Rotterdam Emotional Intelligence Scale (REIS), the Stress Coping Questionnaire (CAE), and the ACAD-COVID-19 scale were used. For data collection, the instruments were digitized. Bivariate analysis with Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results: The mean age of the participants was 19.72 years; most were single and without children (96.9% and 96.8%, respectively). 74.3% did not work, 80.8% were from the first years of study, and 52.7% belonged to nursing school. About 94.2% of participants indicated having adequate emotional intelligence, 91.3% expressed coping with adequate stress, and 67.2% indicated serious concern about returning to face-to-face classes. An association was found between gender (p=0.042), age (p=0.002), year of study (p=0.027), emotional intelligence (p=0.001), and coping with stress (p=0.001) with concern for return to face-to-face classes. Emotional intelligence identified as adequate (OR: 2.580; IC95%: 1.117-5.960) and coping with stress identified as adequate (OR: 2.008; IC95%: 1.018-3.960) are more likely to express serious concern about the return to face-to-face classes after the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: According to the results, the need to safeguard the psychological aspects of students is highlighted, especially emotional intelligence, as well as to improve coping with stress so that they can better manage concerns about returning to face-to-face classes. The educational authorities should implement strategies to improve these aspects in order to ensure the adequate return to face-to-face classes in new scenarios.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The study aimed to determine the association between family support and coping strategies of people diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: The study was analytical and cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 500 participants who were selected by non-probabilistic and snowball sampling and included residents of both sexes who belonged to the city of Lima, with a diagnosis of COVID-19, who lived with relatives, and who accepted to participate in the research. For data collection, the scales "family support" and "Coping and Adaptation Process-Coping Adaptation Processing Scale (CAPS)" were used. The technique used was the survey through the home visit and the questionnaire instrument. To measure the relationship of the study variables, binary logistic regression was chosen, considering coping strategies as the dependent variable and socio-demographic data and family support as independent variables. Results: Of the 500 participants, 50.4% were women, and 49.6% were men. The results revealed that most participants presented a high capacity for coping strategies and high perceived family support (97.2% and 81%, respectively). In the bivariate analysis, socio-demographic aspects and family support and their dimensions were related to high or low capacity for coping strategies. Significant differences were verified between marital status (p=0.026), having children (p=0.037), family support (p=0.000), and its dimensions with coping strategies. Finally, the multivariate analysis found that people with COVID-19 who perceived high family support were 33.74 times (95% CI: 7266-156,739) more likely to have a high capacity for coping strategies. Conclusion: Therefore, it is necessary to promote the development of parental and family support skills in the face of the health emergency caused by COVID-19.

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to design and validate the Compassion Fatigue Scale (EFat-Com) in Peruvian nurses. METHODS: A 13-item scale was designed using qualitative procedures and expert judgment. This version was administered to 201 nursing professionals using an electronic form along with two other measures: the Patient Health Questionnarie-2 and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis supported the existence of two factors with factor loadings > 0.54. Confirmatory factor analysis of the two-factor model yielded satisfactory fit indices after the elimination of two items. Regarding concurrent validity, a positive relationship was obtained between the EFat-Com and the measure of depression; however, no correlation was found with the measure of life satisfaction. The internal consistency was 0.807 for the total scale, 0.79 for Factor 1, and 0.83 for Factor 2. CONCLUSIONS: The EFat-Com showed adequate psychometric properties with respect to content-based validity evidence, internal structure, and reliability. Therefore, the instrument can be used in research and professional settings. However, it is essential to continue studying the validity evidence in other contexts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The study was conducted to establish the association between knowledge of preventive measures and concern about SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection and lifestyle changes in the Peruvian population during the health emergency. This was an analytical and cross-sectional study, with a voluntary non-probabilistic sample of 1101 Peruvian population over 18 years old, from the three regions of the country (Coast, Highlands, and Jungle) who answered the digital questionnaires between June and July 2021. The questionnaires "Knowledge about preventive measures on COVID-19″, PRE-COVID-19, and "Changes in lifestyles during the pandemic," instruments validated in the Peruvian population, were used to determine the association of the variables, the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used, considering changes in lifestyles as the dependent variable. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the participants, 57.4% were women, 42.6% were men, with an average age of 30.9 years (SD = 13.14). The descriptive analysis showed that 50.8% of the participants were not worried about SARS-CoV-2 infection, 72.2% knew about preventive measures, and 56.4% stated that they had changed their lifestyles during the pandemic. A significant association was found between educational level (p = 0.000), having a job (p = 0.048), and being worried about SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.001) with lifestyle changes. In the regression analysis, technical/higher education (95% CI = 1.51-2.67) and being worried about SARS-CoV-2 infection (95% CI = 1.71-1.91) were associated with lifestyle changes during the pandemic. The greater the degree of education and concern or fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the greater the lifestyle changes.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Determinar la validez y confiabilidad de la escala CIBISA para la autoevaluación del aprendizaje práctico de estudiantes de enfermería. Material y Método: Estudio instrumental, transversal, con estudiantes de enfermería que estuvieron realizando prácticas clínicas, en el que se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de la escala CIBISA, tales como la validación de contenido y consistencia interna a través del cálculo de V de Aiken y posteriormente Análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC), respectivamente. Finalmente, se calculó la confiabilidad de la escala. Resultados: Se obtuvo una V de Aiken de 0,9. Asimismo, los valores de asimetría y curtosis del ítem 1 y 28 superaron el valor +/- 1,5. Los índices de bondad de ajuste del modelo original mostraron valores deficientes; por lo que, a través de la técnica de modificación de índices se eliminaron los ítems 8, 10, 18, 21, 25, 28, 13 y 26 donde los índices de bondad de ajuste mostraron que el modelo de 20 ítems era satisfactorio (χ2 = 4776,826; df= 190; p= 0,000; CFI= 0,938; TLI= 0,930; RMSEA= 0,080 y SRMR< 0,080). La confiabilidad de la escala presenta un coeficiente α de Cronbach= 0,91. Conclusión: La escala CIBISA de 20 ítems es válida y confiable para medir la autoevaluación del aprendizaje práctico del estudiante de enfermería.

Objective: To determine the validity and reliability of the CIBISA scale for the self-assessment of practical learning of nursing students. Material and Method: Instrumental, cross-sectional study, with nursing students who were doing clinical practices, in which the psychometric properties of the CIBISA scale were analyzed, such as the validation of content and internal consistency through the calculation of Aiken's V and subsequently confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Finally, the reliability of the scale was calculated. Results: Aiken's V of 0.9 was obtained. Likewise, the values of asymmetry and kurtosis of item 1 and 28 exceeded the value +/- 1.5. The goodness of fit indices of the original model showed deficient values; Therefore, through the index modification technique, items 8, 10, 18, 21, 25, 28, 13 and 26 were eliminated, where the goodness-of-fit indices showed that the 20-item model was satisfactory (χ2= 4776.826; df= 190; p= 0.000; CFI= 0.938; TLI= 0.930; RMSEA= 0.080 and SRMR< 0.080). The reliability of the scale presents a Cronbach's α coefficient=0.91. Conclusion: The 20-item CIBISA scale is valid and reliable to measure the self-assessment of practical learning of nursing students.

Objetivo: Determinar a validade e confiabilidade da escala CIBISA para a autoavaliação da aprendizagem prática de estudantes de enfermagem. Material e Método: Estudo instrumental, transversal, com estudantes de enfermagem que realizavam práticas clínicas, no qual foram analisadas as propriedades psicométricas da escala CIBISA, como a validação de conteúdo e consistência interna através do cálculo do V de Aiken e posteriormente confirmatório análise fatorial (CFA), respectivamente. Por fim, calculou-se a confiabilidade da escala. Resultados: Obteve-se V de Aiken de 0,9. Da mesma forma, os valores de assimetria e curtose dos itens 1 e 28 ultrapassaram o valor +/- 1,5. Os índices de qualidade de ajuste do modelo original apresentaram valores deficientes; portanto, através da técnica de modificação do índice, os itens 8, 10, 18, 21, 25, 28, 13 e 26 foram eliminados, onde os índices de qualidade de ajuste mostraram que o modelo de 20 itens foi satisfatório (χ2= 4776,826; df= 190; p= 0,000; CFI= 0,938; TLI= 0,930; RMSEA= 0,080 e SRMR< 0,080). A confiabilidade da escala apresenta coeficiente α de Cronbach= 0,91. Conclusão: A escala CIBISA de 20 itens é válida e confiável para medir a autoavaliação da aprendizagem prática de estudantes de enfermagem.

RESUMEN

Due to COVID-19, the workload experienced by caregivers has increased markedly which has led them to experience fatigue, anxiety and depression. This study aims to determine the relationship between quality of life and depression in caregivers of post-COVID-19 patients in two regions of Peru. In a cross-sectional analytical study, the sample was non-probabilistic and by snowball, and consisted of 730 caregivers, to whom the questionnaires "Modified Betty Ferell Quality of Life" and the "Beck Depression Inventory" were applied. It was determined that being a male caregiver (OR: 2.119; 95% CI: 1.332-3.369) was associated with a good quality of life. On the other hand, caregivers who had children (OR: 0.391; 95% CI: 0.227-0.675), were vaccinated against COVID-19 (OR: 0.432; 95% CI: 0.250-0.744), were immediate family members (OR: 0.298; 95% CI: 0.117-0.761) and had high depression (OR: 0.189; 95% CI: 0.073-0.490) were associated with poor quality of life. The results of this study allow us to conclude the association between depression and poor quality of life in caregivers of these patients so it is necessary to monitor the mental health of caregivers, and to develop adaptation strategies to pandemic conditions.

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected the provision of care for patients with chronic diseases. Due to social restrictions and reductions in contact with health services, the negative perception of chronic disease is expected to have increased. The aim of this study was to determine the association between perceived access to healthcare and the perception of illness among Peruvian population with chronic disease. It was a cross-sectional analytical study, with a sample of 987 inhabitants to whom the questionnaires "Coverage of health services" and "The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire" (BIPQ) were applied. Having health insurance (PRa = 0.683; 95% CI = 0.613-0.761) acts as a protective factor for a positive illness perception of chronic disease, however, a waiting time greater than 3 months to obtain a medical appointment (PRa = 1.417; 95% CI = 1.319-1.522) and poor access to health services (PRa = 1.435; 95% CI = 1.226-1.681) resulted in the probability of a negative illness perception of chronic disease. Thus, there is an association between perceived poor access to healthcare and the negative illness perception of chronic disease in Peruvian population during pandemic COVID-19.

Asunto(s)