Asunto(s)
Apnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Cafeína/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Apnea/etiología , Bronquiolitis/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We recently published preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of hypertonic saline in infants with viral bronchiolitis. OBJECTIVE: To further establish the efficacy of nebulized hypertonic saline in these infants. METHODS: In a continuing, second-year randomized, doubleblind controlled trial, an additional 41 infants (age 2.6 +/- 1 months) hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis were recruited during the winter of 2001-2002. The infants received inhalation of 1.5 mg epinephrine dissolved either in 4 ml normal (0.9%) saline (Group I, n=20) or 4 ml hypertonic (3%) saline (Group II, n=22). The therapy was repeated three times daily until discharge. Pooling our 2 years of experience (2000-2002), a total of 93 hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis were recruited; 45 were assigned to Group I and 48 to Group II. RESULTS: The clinical scores at baseline were 7.6 +/- 0.7 for Group I vs. 7.4 +/- 1.3 for Group II (P = NS). However, the clinical scores at days 1 and 2 after inhalation differed significantly between the two groups, invariably favoring Group II: 7 +/- 1 vs. 6.25 +/- 1.1 (P< 0.05), 6.45 +/- 1 vs. 5.35 +/- 1.35 (P< 0.05), respectively. Adding aerosolized 3% saline to 1.5 mg epinephrine reduced the hospitalization stay from 3.5 +/- 1.7 days in Group I to 2.6 +/- 1.4 in Group II (P< 0.05). The pooled data of both years revealed that adding 3% saline to the inhalation mixture decreased hospitalization stay from 3.6 +/- 1.6 to 2.8 +/- 1.3 days (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This second-year experience and our 2 year pooled data analysis strengthen the evidence that the combination of 3% saline/1.5 mg epinephrine benefits hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Solución Salina Hipertónica/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Bronquiolitis Viral/epidemiología , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Solución Salina Hipertónica/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the utility of the hood versus the face mask for delivery of inhaled medications to infants hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial; 49 hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis, age 2.75 +/- 2.2 months (mean +/- SD), were grouped to either the hood (n = 25) or the mask (n = 24). Each subject received inhalation treatments with the use of both devices. Half of the Hood Group received the active drug treatment (1.5 mg epinephrine in 4 mL saline [3%]) via hood followed immediately by placebo treatment (normal saline) via mask, whereas the other half received the opposite order. Half of the Mask Group received the active drug treatment via mask followed immediately by placebo treatment via hood, whereas the other half received the opposite order. Therapy was repeated 3 times daily until discharge. Outcome measures included clinical scores and parental preference. RESULTS: Percent improvement in clinical severity scores after inhalation was significant in both groups on days 1, 2, and 3 after admission (Hood Group: 15%, 15.4%, and 16.4%, respectively; Mask Group: 17.5%, 12.1%, and 12.7%, respectively; P < .001). No significant difference in clinical scores improvement between groups was observed. Eighty percent (39/49) of parents favored the hood over the mask; 18% (9/49) preferred the mask and 2% (1/49) were indifferent. CONCLUSIONS: In infants hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis and in whom aerosol treatment is considered, aerosol delivery by hood is as effective as by mask. However, according to parents, the tolerability of the hood is significantly better than that of a mask.
Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Bronquiolitis Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Máscaras , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no ParamétricasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical spectrum of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis in previously healthy infants is extremely variable. Thus, it is likely that factors such as genetic heterogeneity contribute to disease severity. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and CD14 are part of a receptor complex involved in the innate immune response to RSV. METHODS: The association of the TLR4 mutations (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) and the CD14/-159 polymorphism were analyzed in 99 infants hospitalized with severe RSV bronchiolitis (group I). Eighty-two ambulatory infants with mild RSV bronchiolitis (group II) and 90 healthy adults (group III) composed the 2 control groups. The TLR4 mutations and the CD14/-159 polymorphism were genotyped by use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Each of the TLR4 mutations, either alone or in cosegregation, were associated with severe RSV bronchiolitis: the Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile mutations were significantly overrepresented in group I, compared with groups II and III. No association between the CD14/-159 polymorphism and RSV bronchiolitis was found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that TLR4 mutations, but not the CD14/-159 polymorphism, are associated with an increased risk of severe RSV bronchiolitis in previously healthy infants.