RESUMEN
Melanocytes located between the anal transition zone and the dentate line of the anal canal can give rise to the uncommon malignant tumor known as anal melanoma. It has a fast-paced clinical course and can masquerade as several common anorectal symptoms, such as hemorrhoids or rectal ulcers. In melanoma, divergent differentiation is a very uncommon phenomenon. The diagnosis of melanoma is difficult with histopathology sections alone (hematoxylin and eosin, H&E). Special stains and ancillary immunohistochemistry investigations are useful in these situations. A 60-year-old female patient presented to the surgical outpatient department with complaints of anorectal bleeding. After clinical evaluation, a growth in the anorectal region was identified, and a biopsy was taken from the growth. Histopathological and subsequent immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy material was done at the Department of Pathology. A diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma with atypical and divergent neuroendocrine differentiation involving the anorectal region was rendered. Histologically, this tumor showed extremely pleomorphic polygonal to elongated spindle cells that co-expressed neuroendocrine markers and were positive for S100, HMB-45, and Melan-A. This case presented many diagnostic challenges at both the histomorphological level and the immunohistochemical expression profile analysis. We will go into great depth regarding the diagnostic challenges in this instance and provide an outline of our approach. The immunohistochemical and prognostic importance of this case will also be covered.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve sheath tumours comprise benign tumours; namely schwannomas and neurofibromas, and only rarely comprise hybrid benign tumours and their malignant counterpart, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST). There may be diagnostic difficulties in histopathology analysis, especially in core needle biopsies where there is a limited amount of tissue. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play a beneficial role, especially in atypical and cellular histological variants and rarely hybrid tumours. METHODS: A total of 45 cases of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours were included in the study; there were 27 cases of neurofibroma including variants like plexiform and cellular neurofibromas and 18 cases of schwannomas including variants like ancient schwannoma and cellular schwannoma. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) on these tumour tissues using S-100, CD56 and calretinin was done and scoring was done based on extent and intensity. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: No significant differences were observed between neurofibromas and schwannomas on patient age and anatomical locations of these tumours. IHC results did not show statistically significant patterns of expression of S-100 protein between the schwannoma and neurofibromas groups (p=0.75). CD56 protein was expressed strongly (3+) in 90% of cases of schwannoma and negative in 86% of neurofibromas, the differential expression between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p <0.0001). Calretinin was positive in 39% of schwannomas including one case of cellular schwannoma and negative in all (100%) cases of neurofibroma while the differential expression of calretinin between schwannoma and neurofibroma groups was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that S-100 does not show differential expression between schwannomas and neurofibromas. CD56 could be a potentially useful IHC marker to aid in the diagnosis of peripheral nerve sheath tumours with significantly higher expression in schwannomas compared to neurofibromas. Calretinin was also found to be preferentially expressed in schwannomas, though the difference is statistically significantly lower compared to CD56. A panel of all these markers could be used for accurate diagnosis.