RESUMEN

Aim: To describe the perceptions and experiences of key stakeholders to understand the use of telehealth in community mental health centers (CMHCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lima and Callao, Peru. Methods: A qualitative study was carried out in four CMHCs in Lima and Callao, Peru. Forty-nine individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2021 and March 2022, considering CMHCs' users and their relatives, health and administrative workers, directors, as well as local and national policymakers. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Regarding the transition from in-person care to telehealth, CMHCs' directors and workers identified some of the regulations issued by the Government during the pandemic, such as the continuity of care through telehealth, especially for pregnant women and for people with comorbidities related to COVID-19. Regarding benefits, workers and users indicated that it allowed better communication, such as constant follow-ups. Directors and workers recognized that Google Drive facilitated access to user information, since they did not have an electronic medical record. Additionally, workers said they used social media to share educational information on mental health, and explained that some new users began their treatment this way. Regarding difficulties, participants reported a lack of devices and poor internet connection in CMHCs. Users mentioned that scheduling an appointment was difficult because the phone lines were usually saturated, and they could not find available appointments. Conclusion: Although the pandemic forced an immediate and disruptive change towards telehealth, CMHCs were able to adapt most of their services. This study reports the adaptations made by CMHCs to move from in-person to remote care, identifying the benefits and challenges faced, information that can be used for the nationwide implementation of telehealth in CMHCs. We recommend ensuring technological equipment and internet connection and adapt the telehealth system to make it responsive to the routine practices of CMHCs.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE.: To understand the experiences of new and continuing users of Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) of Lima and Callao, and their relatives, regarding the mental health care they received during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: Qualitative study conducted between September 2021 and February 2022, in which we interviewed 24 users and family members who interacted with the services provided by three CMHCs in Lima and one in Callao during the COVID-19 pandemic. We carried out a thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews. RESULTS.: Participants perceived that the pandemic exacerbated the symptoms of people with mental health problems. During the pandemic, mental health care relied on the use of technology, mainly telephone calls, which were used to monitor the emotional state and pharmacological treatment of users, as well as to schedule and remember appointments. The users emphasized that frequent telephone calls made them feel accompanied and highlighted the commitment of the CMHC workers. Among the difficulties, they reported an increase in the demand for care, problems in accessing video calls, and low quality in virtual care. CONCLUSIONS.: COVID-19 had an emotional impact on people with mental health problems; in turn, CMHC services were affected by the type of care (face-to-face or virtual), resources, frequency, time and quality of care, finding limitations and benefits in the use of technology.

OBJETIVOS.: Comprender las experiencias de usuarios nuevos y continuadores de los Centros de Salud Mental Comunitaria (CSMC) de Lima y Callao, y de sus familiares, en relación a la atención en salud mental que recibieron durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: Estudio cualitativo realizado entre septiembre del 2021 y febrero del 2022, en el que se entrevistó a 24 usuarios y familiares que interactuaron con los servicios brindados por tres CSMC de Lima y uno del Callao, durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Se realizó un análisis temático de las entrevistas transcritas. RESULTADOS.: Los informantes percibieron que la pandemia exacerbó los síntomas de las personas con problemas de salud mental. Durante la pandemia, las atenciones de salud mental se apoyaron en el uso de tecnología, principalmente de llamadas telefónicas, las que sirvieron para monitorear el estado emocional y el tratamiento farmacológico de los usuarios, así como para programar y recordar citas. Los usuarios destacan que las llamadas telefónicas frecuentes les hicieron sentirse acompañados y resaltan el compromiso de los trabajadores de los CSMC. Como dificultades, reportan el incremento en la demanda de atención, problemas para acceder a videollamadas, y menor calidad en las atenciones virtuales. CONCLUSIONES.: La COVID-19 impactó emocionalmente a las personas con problemas de salud mental, a su vez, los servicios de los CSMC vieron afectada la modalidad (presencial o virtual), recursos, frecuencia, tiempo y calidad de la atención, encontrando limitaciones y beneficios en el uso de la tecnología.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Governments globally deployed various non-pharmacological public health measures to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e. lockdowns and suspension of transportation, amongst others); some of these measures had an influence on society's mental health. Specific mental health policies were therefore implemented to mitigate the potential mental health impact of the pandemic. We aimed to explore the implementation of mental health regulations adopted by the Peruvian health system by focusing on the care services at Community Mental Health Centres (CMHCs), based on the experiences of health workers. We conducted a phenomenological qualitative study to understand the implementation of mental health policies launched in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were obtained from a document review of 15 national policy measures implemented during the pandemic (March 2020 to September 2021), and 20 interviews with health workers from CMHCs (September 2021 to February 2022). The analysis was conducted using thematic content analysis. Most implemented policies adapted CMHC care services to a virtual modality during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, various challenges and barriers were evidenced in the process, which prevented effective adaptation of services. Workers perceived that ineffective telemedicine use was attributed to a gap in access to technology at the CMHCs and also by users, ranging from limited access to technological devices to a lack of technological skills. Further, although mental health promotion and prevention policies targeting the community were proposed, CMHC staff reported temporary interruption of these services during the first wave. The disparity between what is stated in the regulations and the experiences of health workers is evident. Policies that focus on mental health need to provide practical and flexible methods taking into consideration both the needs of CMHCs and socio-cultural characteristics that may affect their implementation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic was that the provision of mental health services was reduced in several countries around the world, while the demand for mental health services increased. AIMS: Our study aims to determine any variation in the number of users served, health appointments, and care activities conducted at 58 Peruvian community mental health centers (CMHCs) between March 2019 and October 2021. METHODS: Our study used an observational design and analyzed information from the care provided in CMHCs. We evaluate the number of users served, health appointments, and care activities performed per month. The main statistical analysis used segmented regression with Newey-West standard errors, taking into account each month of the evaluation. RESULTS: We had 988,456 unique users during the period evaluated. Regarding diagnoses, 7.4% (n = 72,818) had a severe mental problem, 39.4% (n = 389,330) a common mental problem, and 53.2% (n = 526,308) others health problems. The study found a reduction in the number of users served and health care appointments at the 58 CMHCs in March 2020, the month in which the closure measures were declared to reduce COVID-19 infections in Peru. This reduction was followed by an upward trend in the three variables during the pandemic in the 58 CMHCs studied. In, November 2020, 9 months after the pandemic started, the deficit in the average number of users served per month was recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that CMHCs in the Peruvian system were able to regain care capacity approximately 1 year after the pandemic. In addition, we discuss the efforts made to respond to mental health needs in the context of a global health crisis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivos. Comprender las experiencias de usuarios nuevos y continuadores de los Centros de Salud Mental Comunitaria (CSMC) de Lima y Callao, y de sus familiares, en relación a la atención en salud mental que recibieron durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Estudio cualitativo realizado entre septiembre del 2021 y febrero del 2022, en el que se entrevistó a 24 usuarios y familiares que interactuaron con los servicios brindados por tres CSMC de Lima y uno del Callao, durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. Se realizó un análisis temático de las entrevistas transcritas. Resultados. Los informantes percibieron que la pandemia exacerbó los síntomas de las personas con problemas de salud mental. Durante la pandemia, las atenciones de salud mental se apoyaron en el uso de tecnología, principalmente de llamadas telefónicas, las que sirvieron para monitorear el estado emocional y el tratamiento farmacológico de los usuarios, así como para programar y recordar citas. Los usuarios destacan que las llamadas telefónicas frecuentes les hicieron sentirse acompañados y resaltan el compromiso de los trabajadores de los CSMC. Como dificultades, reportan el incremento en la demanda de atención, problemas para acceder a videollamadas, y menor calidad en las atenciones virtuales. Conclusiones. La COVID-19 impactó emocionalmente a las personas con problemas de salud mental, a su vez, los servicios de los CSMC vieron afectada la modalidad (presencial o virtual), recursos, frecuencia, tiempo y calidad de la atención, encontrando limitaciones y beneficios en el uso de la tecnología.

Objective. To understand the experiences of new and continuing users of Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) of Lima and Callao, and their relatives, regarding the mental health care they received during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. Qualitative study conducted between September 2021 and February 2022, in which we interviewed 24 users and family members who interacted with the services provided by three CMHCs in Lima and one in Callao during the COVID-19 pandemic. We carried out a thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews. Results. Participants perceived that the pandemic exacerbated the symptoms of people with mental health problems. During the pandemic, mental health care relied on the use of technology, mainly telephone calls, which were used to monitor the emotional state and pharmacological treatment of users, as well as to schedule and remember appointments. The users emphasized that frequent telephone calls made them feel accompanied and highlighted the commitment of the CMHC workers. Among the difficulties, they reported an increase in the demand for care, problems in accessing video calls, and low quality in virtual care. Conclusions. COVID-19 had an emotional impact on people with mental health problems; in turn, CMHC services were affected by the type of care (face-to-face or virtual), resources, frequency, time and quality of care, finding limitations and benefits in the use of technology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Nutritional warnings are used as a public health strategy to address obesity. Peru approved in 2013 and implemented in 2019 a law requiring nutritional warnings on the marketing and packaging of processed foods high in sugar, sodium, saturated fat, and containing trans-fat. The complexity behind the design and approval of these policies over six years provides unique learnings, that inform the obesity prevention context, especially when proposed policies face strong opposition from powerful stakeholders. Our study aims to describe the milestones and key stakeholders' roles and stances during the nutritional warnings policy design in Peru, and to identify and analyze the main drivers of policy change that explain its approval. In 2021, interviews were conducted with 25 key informants closely involved in its design. Interviews were analyzed using the Kaleidoscope Model as a theoretical framework. Relevant policy documents and news were also analyzed. Milestones for this policy included the approval of the Law, Regulation, and Manual. Policy supporters were mainly from Congress, civil society advocates, and Health Ministers. Opponents came from Congress, ministries linked to the economic sector, the food industry, and media. Across the years, warnings evolved from a single text, to traffic lights, to the approved black octagons. Main challenges included the strong opposition of powerful stakeholders, the lack of agreement for defining the appropriate evidence supporting nutritional warning parameters and design, and the political instability of the country. Based on the Kaleidoscope Model, the policy successfully targeted a relevant problem (unhealthy eating decisions) and had powerful advocates who effectively used focusing events to reposition the warnings in the policy agenda across the years. Negotiations weakened the policy but led to its approval. Importantly, government veto players were mostly in favor of the policy, which enabled its final approval despite the strong opposition.

RESUMEN

La venta de productos ultraprocesados y el sobrepeso y la obesidad han aumentado en América Latina en los últimos años. En el Perú, se aprobó la Ley N° 30021 en busca de reducir el sobrepeso y la obesidad en niños y adolescentes, sin embargo, el desarrollo de esta Ley se caracterizó por tener continuas modificaciones en los diversos documentos elaborados. El propósito de este artículo es identificar cambios esenciales en los documentos elaborados por el Gobierno y el Congreso en el marco de la Ley N° 30021, específicamente en los temas de regulación de la publicidad de alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas, advertencias publicitarias y parámetros técnicos de nutrientes críticos. Los cambios identificados en los diferentes documentos muestran el dinamismo en el desarrollo de esta política donde la falta de evidencia científica oportuna, la oposición de la industria alimentaria y la falta de consenso político fueron los principales motivos.

The sale of ultra-processed products has increased in Latin America in recent years, as well as the prevalence of overweight and obesity. In Peru, Law No. 30021 passed in an attempt to reduce overweight and obesity in children and adolescents; however, the development of this law was characterized by constant modifications to the documents prepared in this regard. This article aims to identify essential modifications in the documents elaborated by the Government and the Congress within the timeframe of Law No. 30021, particularly those regarding the regulation of food and non-alcoholic beverage advertising, advertising warnings and technical parameters of critical nutrients. The lack of timely scientific evidence, the opposition by the food industry and the lack of political consensus were the main reasons for the detected modifications, which shows the dynamism during the development of this policy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders and a leading cause of disability, disproportionately affecting specific groups, such as patients with noncommunicable diseases. Over the past decade, digital interventions have been developed to provide treatment for these patients. CONEMO (Emotional Control in Spanish) is an 18-session psychoeducational digital intervention delivered through a smartphone app and minimally supported by a nurse. CONEMO demonstrated effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among patients with diabetes, hypertension, or both, in Lima, Peru. However, in addition to clinical outcomes, it is important to explore users' experiences, satisfaction, and perceptions of usability and acceptability, which can affect their engagement with the intervention. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the RCT participants' experiences with CONEMO in Peru, complemented with information provided by the nurses who monitored them. METHODS: In 2018, semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of 29 (13.4%) patients from the 217 patients who participated in the CONEMO intervention in Peru and the 3 hired nurses who supported its delivery. Interviewees were selected at random based on their adherence to the digital intervention (0-5, 10-14, and 15-18 sessions completed), to include different points of view. Content analysis was conducted to analyze the interviews. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 64.4 (SD 8.5) years, and 79% (23/29) of them were women. Most of the interviewed participants (21/29, 72%) stated that CONEMO fulfilled their expectations and identified positive changes in their physical and mental health after using it. Some of these improvements were related to their thoughts and feelings (eg, think differently, be more optimistic, and feel calmer), whereas others were related to their routines (eg, go out more and improve health-related habits). Most participants (19/29, 66%) reported not having previous experience with using smartphones, and despite experiencing some initial difficulties, they managed to use CONEMO. The most valued features of the app were the videos and activities proposed for the participant to perform. Most participants (27/29, 93%) had a good opinion about the study nurses and reported feeling supported by them. A few participants provided suggestions to improve the intervention, which included adding more videos, making the sessions' text simple, extending the length of the intervention, and improving the training session with long explanations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this qualitative study provide further support and contextualize the positive results found in the CONEMO RCT, including insights into the key features that made the intervention effective and engaging. The participants' experience with the smartphone and CONEMO app reveal that it is feasible to be used by people with little knowledge of technology. In addition, the study identified suggestions to improve the CONEMO intervention for its future scale-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03026426; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03026426.

RESUMEN

We aimed to characterize the satisfaction and perceptions of the residents of Lima about different aspects of urban life that can affect their quality of life and health, identifying differences by socioeconomic status (SES) and changes over time. A secondary data analysis of the "Lima Cómo Vamos" survey was conducted between 2010 and 2019. Results are reported through percentages, with differences between SES for each year and between years. In 2019, satisfaction and perceptions were mostly unfavorable, and have decreased by up to 30% over time. People with lower SES had more unfavorable evaluations and with greater reductions over time. This dissatisfaction and unfavorable perceptions reveal deficiencies in public services and urban conditions that could negatively affect the quality of life and health, making it necessary to design and implement policies that reduce socioeconomic gaps and improve the health of Lima citizens.

Se buscó caracterizar la satisfacción y percepciones de los residentes de Lima Metropolitana sobre distintos aspectos de la ciudad que pueden afectar su calidad de vida y salud, identificando diferencias por nivel socioeconómico (NSE) y cambios en el tiempo. Se realizó un análisis secundario de la Encuesta «Lima Cómo Vamos¼ entre 2010 y 2019, reportando los resultados mediante porcentajes, con diferencias entre NSE para cada año y entre años. En 2019 la satisfacción y percepciones eran mayoritariamente desfavorables, y han disminuido hasta en 30 puntos porcentuales con el tiempo. Las personas de NSE más bajos tenían valoraciones más desfavorables y con mayores reducciones en el tiempo. Esta insatisfacción y percepciones desfavorables revelan deficiencias en servicios públicos y condiciones urbanas que podrían afectar negativamente la calidad de vida y salud, haciendo necesarias políticas que reduzcan las brechas socioeconómicas y mejoren la salud de los ciudadanos de Lima Metropolitana.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of technologies has served to reduce gaps in access to treatment, and digital health interventions show promise in the care of mental health problems. However, to understand what and how these interventions work, it is imperative to document the aspects related to their challenging implementation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine what evidence is available for synchronous digital mental health implementation and to develop a framework, informed by a realist review, to explain what makes digital mental health interventions work for people with mental health problems. METHODS: The SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research type) framework was used to develop the following review question: What makes digital mental health interventions with a synchronous component work on people with mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, or stress, based on implementation, economic, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies? The MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to September 2020 with no language restriction. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) was used to assess the risk of bias and Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) was used to assess the confidence in cumulative evidence. Realist synthesis analysis allowed for developing a framework on the implementation of synchronous digital mental health using a grounded-theory approach with an emergent approach. RESULTS: A total of 21 systematic reviews were included in the study. Among these, 90% (n=19) presented a critically low confidence level as assessed with AMSTAR-2. The realist synthesis allowed for the development of three hypotheses to identify the context and mechanisms in which these interventions achieve these outcomes: (1) these interventions reach populations otherwise unable to have access because they do not require the physical presence of the therapist nor the patient, thereby tackling geographic barriers posed by in-person therapy; (2) these interventions reach populations otherwise unable to have access because they can be successfully delivered by nonspecialists, which makes them more cost-effective to implement in health services; and (3) these interventions are acceptable and show good results in satisfaction because they require less need of disclosure and provide more privacy, comfortability, and participation, enabling the establishment of rapport with the therapist. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a framework with three hypotheses that explain what makes digital mental health interventions with a synchronous component work on people with mental health problems. Each hypothesis represents essential outcomes in the implementation process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020203811; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020203811. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.12688/f1000research.27150.2.

RESUMEN

RESUMEN Se buscó caracterizar la satisfacción y percepciones de los residentes de Lima Metropolitana sobre distintos aspectos de la ciudad que pueden afectar su calidad de vida y salud, identificando diferencias por nivel socioeconómico (NSE) y cambios en el tiempo. Se realizó un análisis secundario de la Encuesta «Lima Cómo Vamos¼ entre 2010 y 2019, reportando los resultados mediante porcentajes, con diferencias entre NSE para cada año y entre años. En 2019 la satisfacción y percepciones eran mayoritariamente desfavorables, y han disminuido hasta en 30 puntos porcentuales con el tiempo. Las personas de NSE más bajos tenían valoraciones más desfavorables y con mayores reducciones en el tiempo. Esta insatisfacción y percepciones desfavorables revelan deficiencias en servicios públicos y condiciones urbanas que podrían afectar negativamente la calidad de vida y salud, haciendo necesarias políticas que reduzcan las brechas socioeconómicas y mejoren la salud de los ciudadanos de Lima Metropolitana.

ABSTRACT We aimed to characterize the satisfaction and perceptions of the residents of Lima about different aspects of urban life that can affect their quality of life and health, identifying differences by socioeconomic status (SES) and changes over time. A secondary data analysis of the "Lima Cómo Vamos" survey was conducted between 2010 and 2019. Results are reported through percentages, with differences between SES for each year and between years. In 2019, satisfaction and perceptions were mostly unfavorable, and have decreased by up to 30% over time. People with lower SES had more unfavorable evaluations and with greater reductions over time. This dissatisfaction and unfavorable perceptions reveal deficiencies in public services and urban conditions that could negatively affect the quality of life and health, making it necessary to design and implement policies that reduce socioeconomic gaps and improve the health of Lima citizens.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The sale of ultra-processed products has increased in Latin America in recent years, as well as the prevalence of overweight and obesity. In Peru, Law No. 30021 passed in an attempt to reduce overweight and obesity in children and adolescents; however, the development of this law was characterized by constant modifications to the documents prepared in this regard. This article aims to identify essential modifications in the documents elaborated by the Government and the Congress within the timeframe of Law No. 30021, particularly those regarding the regulation of food and non-alcoholic beverage advertising, advertising warnings and technical parameters of critical nutrients. The lack of timely scientific evidence, the opposition by the food industry and the lack of political consensus were the main reasons for the detected modifications, which shows the dynamism during the development of this policy.

La venta de productos ultraprocesados y el sobrepeso y la obesidad han aumentado en América Latina en los últimos años. En el Perú, se aprobó la Ley N° 30021 en busca de reducir el sobrepeso y la obesidad en niños y adolescentes, sin embargo, el desarrollo de esta Ley se caracterizó por tener continuas modificaciones en los diversos documentos elaborados. El propósito de este artículo es identificar cambios esenciales en los documentos elaborados por el Gobierno y el Congreso en el marco de la Ley N° 30021, específicamente en los temas de regulación de la publicidad de alimentos y bebidas no alcohólicas, advertencias publicitarias y parámetros técnicos de nutrientes críticos. Los cambios identificados en los diferentes documentos muestran el dinamismo en el desarrollo de esta política donde la falta de evidencia científica oportuna, la oposición de la industria alimentaria y la falta de consenso político fueron los principales motivos.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mobile health interventions provide significant strategies for improving access to health services, offering a potential solution to reduce the mental health treatment gap. Economic evaluation of this intervention is needed to help inform local mental health policy and program development. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the protocol for an economic evaluation conducted alongside 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered through a technological platform (CONEMO) to treat depressive symptoms in people with diabetes, hypertension, or both. METHODS: The economic evaluation uses a within-trial analysis to evaluate the incremental costs and health outcomes of CONEMO plus enhanced usual care in comparison with enhanced usual care from public health care system and societal perspectives. Participants are patients of the public health care services for hypertension, diabetes, or both conditions in São Paulo, Brazil (n=880) and Lima, Peru (n=432). Clinical effectiveness will be measured by reduction in depressive symptoms and gains in health-related quality of life. We will conduct cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, providing estimates of the cost per at least 50% reduction in 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores, and cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. The measurement of clinical effectiveness and resource use will take place over baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up in the intervention and control groups. We will use a mixed costing methodology (ie, a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches) considering 4 cost categories: intervention (CONEMO related) costs, health care costs, patient and family costs, and productivity costs. We will collect unit costs from the RCTs and national administrative databases. The multinational economic evaluations will be fully split analyses with a multicountry costing approach. We will calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and present 95% CIs from nonparametric bootstrapping (1000 replicates). We will perform deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Finally, we will present cost-effectiveness acceptability curves to compare a range of possible cost-effectiveness thresholds. RESULTS: The economic evaluation project had its project charter in June 2018 and is expected to be completed in September 2021. The final results will be available in the second half of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: We expect to assess whether CONEMO plus enhanced usual care is a cost-effective strategy to improve depressive symptoms in this population compared with enhanced usual care. This study will contribute to the evidence base for health managers and policy makers in allocating additional resources for mental health initiatives. It also will provide a basis for further research on how this emerging technology and enhanced usual care can improve mental health and well-being in low- and middle-income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT12345678 (Brazil) and NCT03026426 (Peru); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02846662 and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03026426. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/26164.

RESUMEN

Importance: Depression is a leading contributor to disease burden globally. Digital mental health interventions can address the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries, but the effectiveness in these countries is unknown. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a digital intervention in reducing depressive symptoms among people with diabetes and/or hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: Participants with clinically significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥10) who were being treated for hypertension and/or diabetes were enrolled in a cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) at 20 sites in São Paulo, Brazil (N=880; from September 2016 to September 2017; final follow-up, April 2018), and in an individual-level RCT at 7 sites in Lima, Peru (N=432; from January 2017 to September 2017; final follow-up, March 2018). Interventions: An 18-session, low-intensity, digital intervention was delivered over 6 weeks via a provided smartphone, based on behavioral activation principles, and supported by nurse assistants (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 217 participants in Lima) vs enhanced usual care (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 215 participants in Lima). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 50% from baseline in PHQ-9 scores (range, 0-27; higher score indicates more severe depression) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included a reduction of at least 50% from baseline PHQ-9 scores at 6 months. Results: Among 880 patients cluster randomized in Brazil (mean age, 56.0 years; 761 [86.5%] women) and 432 patients individually randomized in Peru (mean age, 59.7 years; 352 [81.5%] women), 807 (91.7%) in Brazil and 426 (98.6%) in Peru completed at least 1 follow-up assessment. The proportion of participants in São Paulo with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 40.7% (159/391 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 28.6% (114/399 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 12.1 percentage points [95% CI, 5.5 to 18.7]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2]; P = .001). In Lima, the proportion of participants with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 52.7% (108/205 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 34.1% (70/205 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 18.6 percentage points [95% CI, 9.1 to 28.0]; adjusted OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.2]; P < .001). At 6-month follow-up, differences across groups were no longer statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In 2 RCTs of patients with hypertension or diabetes and depressive symptoms in Brazil and Peru, a digital intervention delivered over a 6-week period significantly improved depressive symptoms at 3 months when compared with enhanced usual care. However, the magnitude of the effect was small in the trial from Brazil and the effects were not sustained at 6 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02846662 (São Paulo) and NCT03026426 (Lima).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe the implementation of the Continuity of Care and Rehabilitation Program (PCC-R) in community mental health centers (CSMCs, Spanish acronym) in Peru. METHODS: Qualitative study of the implementation of the PCC-R in four CSMCs in Lima and La Libertad, Peru. Forty-two individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, as well as a focus group with five participants, for a total of 47 informants, including users, family members, and professionals involved in the design, implementation, and monitoring of the program. RESULTS: The PCC-R is a key program for community mental health services in Peru and it enjoys broad acceptability. Providers and users report satisfaction with its results; however, the program lacks a policy document specifying its objectives, organization, and activities. This would explain the variability in its implementation. The PCC-R has limitations in terms of management of financial and human resources, and it is necessary to improve training and supervision. There is consensus on the need, usefulness, and viability of developing a system to monitor the PCC-R. Good practices and suggestions are presented with a view to addressing these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The PCC-R is a flagship program for the CSMCs and for the mental health reform in Peru. It has achieved broad acceptability among providers and users. Its implementation combines successes and difficulties, with pending tasks that include developing a policy document, improving resource management, strengthening training and supervision, and implementing a monitoring system for continuous improvement of the program.

OBJETIVO: Descrever a implementação do Programa de Continuidade de Cuidados e Reabilitação (PCC-R) em centros de saúde mental comunitária (CSMCs) do Peru. MÉTODOS: Estudo qualitativo sobre a implementação do PCC-R em quatro CSMCs em Lima e La Libertad, no Peru. Realizamos 42 entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais e um grupo focal com cinco participantes, com um total de 47 participantes, entre usuários, familiares e profissionais envolvidos na elaboração, implementação e monitoramento do PCC-R. RESULTADOS: O PCC-R é um programa central dos serviços de saúde mental comunitária no Peru, conta com ampla aceitabilidade e os prestadores e usuários dizem estar satisfeitos com seus resultados. No entanto, o programa não possui um documento normativo que detalhe os seus objetivos, organização e atividades, o que pode explicar a variabilidade em sua aplicação. Existem limitações na gestão dos recursos financeiros e humanos do PCC-R e necessidades de capacitação e supervisão, que devem ser melhoradas. Há consenso sobre a necessidade, utilidade e viabilidade de se desenvolver um sistema de monitoramento do PCC-R. Apresentamos aqui um conjunto de boas práticas e sugestões para enfrentar esses desafios. CONCLUSÕES: O PCC-R é um programa emblemático dos CSMCs e da reforma da saúde mental no Peru, tendo obtido ampla aceitação entre prestadores e usuários. A sua implementação combina acertos e dificuldades e revela tarefas pendentes, tais como o desenvolvimento de um documento normativo, uma melhor gestão de recursos, o reforço da capacitação e supervisão e a aplicação de um sistema de monitoramento para fomentar a melhoria contínua do programa.

RESUMEN

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Describe the implementation of the Continuity of Care and Rehabilitation Program (PCC-R) in community mental health centers (CSMCs, Spanish acronym) in Peru. Methods. Qualitative study of the implementation of the PCC-R in four CSMCs in Lima and La Libertad, Peru. Forty-two individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, as well as a focus group with five participants, for a total of 47 informants, including users, family members, and professionals involved in the design, implementation, and monitoring of the program. Results. The PCC-R is a key program for community mental health services in Peru and it enjoys broad acceptability. Providers and users report satisfaction with its results; however, the program lacks a policy document specifying its objectives, organization, and activities. This would explain the variability in its implementation. The PCC-R has limitations in terms of management of financial and human resources, and it is necessary to improve training and supervision. There is consensus on the need, usefulness, and viability of developing a system to monitor the PCC-R. Good practices and suggestions are presented with a view to addressing these challenges. Conclusions. The PCC-R is a flagship program for the CSMCs and for mental health reform in Peru. It has achieved broad acceptability among providers and users. Its implementation combines successes and difficulties, with pending tasks that include developing a policy document, improving resource management, strengthening training and supervision, and implementing a monitoring system for continuous improvement of the program.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Describir la implementación del Programa de continuidad de cuidados y rehabilitación (PCC-R) en centros de salud mental comunitaria (CSMC) del Perú. Métodos. Estudio cualitativo sobre la implementación del PCC-R en cuatro CSMC de Lima y La Libertad, Perú. Se realizaron 42 entrevistas semiestructuradas individuales y un grupo focal con cinco participantes, para un total de 47 informantes entre usuarios, familiares y profesionales vinculados al diseño, la implementación y el monitoreo del PCC-R. Resultados. El PCC-R es un programa central de los servicios de salud mental comunitaria en Perú, goza de amplia aceptación y los prestadores y usuarios refieren estar satisfechos con sus resultados. Sin embargo, el programa carece de un documento normativo que detalle sus objetivos, organización y actividades, lo que explicaría la variabilidad en su aplicación. Existen limitaciones en la gestión de recursos financieros y humanos del PCC-R y necesidades de capacitación y supervisión, que deben ser mejoradas. Existe consenso sobre la necesidad, la utilidad y la viabilidad de desarrollar un sistema de monitoreo del PCC-R. Se recogen buenas prácticas y sugerencias para enfrentar estos retos. Conclusiones. El PCC-R es un programa insignia de los CSMC y de la reforma de la salud mental en Perú, y ha logrado amplia aceptación entre los prestadores y usuarios. Su implementación combina aciertos y dificultades, y revela tareas pendientes como desarrollar un documento normativo, mejorar la gestión de recursos, fortalecer la capacitación y acompañamiento, y aplicar un sistema de monitoreo para favorecer la mejora continua del programa.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever a implementação do Programa de Continuidade de Cuidados e Reabilitação (PCC-R) em centros de saúde mental comunitária (CSMCs) do Peru. Métodos. Estudo qualitativo sobre a implementação do PCC-R em quatro CSMCs em Lima e La Libertad, no Peru. Realizamos 42 entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais e um grupo focal com cinco participantes, com um total de 47 participantes, entre usuários, familiares e profissionais envolvidos na elaboração, implementação e monitoramento do PCC-R. Resultados. O PCC-R é um programa central dos serviços de saúde mental comunitária no Peru, conta com ampla aceitabilidade e os prestadores e usuários dizem estar satisfeitos com seus resultados. No entanto, o programa não possui um documento normativo que detalhe os seus objetivos, organização e atividades, o que pode explicar a variabilidade em sua aplicação. Existem limitações na gestão dos recursos financeiros e humanos do PCC-R e necessidades de capacitação e supervisão, que devem ser melhoradas. Há consenso sobre a necessidade, utilidade e viabilidade de se desenvolver um sistema de monitoramento do PCC-R. Apresentamos aqui um conjunto de boas práticas e sugestões para enfrentar esses desafios. Conclusões. O PCC-R é um programa emblemático dos CSMCs e da reforma da saúde mental no Peru, tendo obtido ampla aceitação entre prestadores e usuários. A sua implementação combina acertos e dificuldades e revela tarefas pendentes, tais como o desenvolvimento de um documento normativo, uma melhor gestão de recursos, o reforço da capacitação e supervisão e a aplicação de um sistema de monitoramento para fomentar a melhoria contínua do programa.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Describir la implementación del Programa de continuidad de cuidados y rehabilitación (PCC-R) en centros de salud mental comunitaria (CSMC) del Perú. Métodos. Estudio cualitativo sobre la implementación del PCC-R en cuatro CSMC de Lima y La Libertad, Perú. Se realizaron 42 entrevistas semiestructuradas individuales y un grupo focal con cinco participantes, para un total de 47 informantes entre usuarios, familiares y profesionales vinculados al diseño, la implementación y el monitoreo del PCC-R. Resultados. El PCC-R es un programa central de los servicios de salud mental comunitaria en Perú, goza de amplia aceptación y los prestadores y usuarios refieren estar satisfechos con sus resultados. Sin embargo, el programa carece de un documento normativo que detalle sus objetivos, organización y actividades, lo que explicaría la variabilidad en su aplicación. Existen limitaciones en la gestión de recursos financieros y humanos del PCC-R y necesidades de capacitación y supervisión, que deben ser mejoradas. Existe consenso sobre la necesidad, la utilidad y la viabilidad de desarrollar un sistema de monitoreo del PCC-R. Se recogen buenas prácticas y sugerencias para enfrentar estos retos. Conclusiones. El PCC-R es un programa insignia de los CSMC y de la reforma de la salud mental en Perú, y ha logrado amplia aceptación entre los prestadores y usuarios. Su implementación combina aciertos y dificultades, y revela tareas pendientes como desarrollar un documento normativo, mejorar la gestión de recursos, fortalecer la capacitación y acompañamiento, y aplicar un sistema de monitoreo para favorecer la mejora continua del programa.

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Describe the implementation of the Continuity of Care and Rehabilitation Program (PCC-R) in community mental health centers (CSMCs, Spanish acronym) in Peru. Methods. Qualitative study of the implementation of the PCC-R in four CSMCs in Lima and La Libertad, Peru. Forty-two individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, as well as a focus group with five participants, for a total of 47 informants, including users, family members, and professionals involved in the design, implementation, and monitoring of the program. Results. The PCC-R is a key program for community mental health services in Peru and it enjoys broad acceptability. Providers and users report satisfaction with its results; however, the program lacks a policy document specifying its objectives, organization, and activities. This would explain the variability in its implementation. The PCC-R has limitations in terms of management of financial and human resources, and it is necessary to improve training and supervision. There is consensus on the need, usefulness, and viability of developing a system to monitor the PCC-R. Good practices and suggestions are presented with a view to addressing these challenges. Conclusions. The PCC-R is a flagship program for the CSMCs and for the mental health reform in Peru. It has achieved broad acceptability among providers and users. Its implementation combines successes and difficulties, with pending tasks that include developing a policy document, improving resource management, strengthening training and supervision, and implementing a monitoring system for continuous improvement of the program.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever a implementação do Programa de Continuidade de Cuidados e Reabilitação (PCC-R) em centros de saúde mental comunitária (CSMCs) do Peru. Métodos. Estudo qualitativo sobre a implementação do PCC-R em quatro CSMCs em Lima e La Libertad, no Peru. Realizamos 42 entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais e um grupo focal com cinco participantes, com um total de 47 participantes, entre usuários, familiares e profissionais envolvidos na elaboração, implementação e monitoramento do PCC-R. Resultados. O PCC-R é um programa central dos serviços de saúde mental comunitária no Peru, conta com ampla aceitabilidade e os prestadores e usuários dizem estar satisfeitos com seus resultados. No entanto, o programa não possui um documento normativo que detalhe os seus objetivos, organização e atividades, o que pode explicar a variabilidade em sua aplicação. Existem limitações na gestão dos recursos financeiros e humanos do PCC-R e necessidades de capacitação e supervisão, que devem ser melhoradas. Há consenso sobre a necessidade, utilidade e viabilidade de se desenvolver um sistema de monitoramento do PCC-R. Apresentamos aqui um conjunto de boas práticas e sugestões para enfrentar esses desafios. Conclusões. O PCC-R é um programa emblemático dos CSMCs e da reforma da saúde mental no Peru, tendo obtido ampla aceitação entre prestadores e usuários. A sua implementação combina acertos e dificuldades e revela tarefas pendentes, tais como o desenvolvimento de um documento normativo, uma melhor gestão de recursos, o reforço da capacitação e supervisão e a aplicação de um sistema de monitoramento para fomentar a melhoria contínua do programa.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe the implementation of the Continuity of Care and Rehabilitation Program (PCC-R) in community mental health centers (CSMCs, Spanish acronym) in Peru. METHODS: Qualitative study of the implementation of the PCC-R in four CSMCs in Lima and La Libertad, Peru. Forty-two individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, as well as a focus group with five participants, for a total of 47 informants, including users, family members, and professionals involved in the design, implementation, and monitoring of the program. RESULTS: The PCC-R is a key program for community mental health services in Peru and it enjoys broad acceptability. Providers and users report satisfaction with its results; however, the program lacks a policy document specifying its objectives, organization, and activities. This would explain the variability in its implementation. The PCC-R has limitations in terms of management of financial and human resources, and it is necessary to improve training and supervision. There is consensus on the need, usefulness, and viability of developing a system to monitor the PCC-R. Good practices and suggestions are presented with a view to addressing these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The PCC-R is a flagship program for the CSMCs and for mental health reform in Peru. It has achieved broad acceptability among providers and users. Its implementation combines successes and difficulties, with pending tasks that include developing a policy document, improving resource management, strengthening training and supervision, and implementing a monitoring system for continuous improvement of the program.

RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to understand the offer of mental health care at the primary care level, collecting the views of psychologists, primary health care providers (PHCPs), and patients, with a focus on health services in which patients attend regularly and who present a higher prevalence of mental disorders. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in antenatal care, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and chronic diseases services from six primary health care centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with psychologists, PHCPs, and patients working in or attending the selected facilities.  Results: A total of 4 psychologists, 22 PHCPs, and 37 patients were interviewed. A high perceived need for mental health care was noted. PHCPs acknowledged the emotional impact physical health conditions have on their patients and mentioned that referral to psychologists was reserved only for serious problems. Their approach to emotional problems was providing emotional support (includes listening, talk about their patients' feelings, provide advice). PHCPs identified system-level barriers about the specialized mental health care, including a shortage of psychologists and an overwhelming demand, which results in brief consultations and lack in continuity of care. Psychologists focus their work on individual consultations; however, consultations were brief, did not follow a standardized model of care, and most patients attend only once. Psychologists also mentioned the lack of collaborative work among other healthcare providers. Despite these limitations, interviewed patients declared that they were willing to seek specialized care if advised and considered the psychologist's care provided as helpful; however, they recognized the stigmatization related to seeking mental health care. Conclusions: There is a perceived need of mental health care for primary care patients. To attend these needs, PHCPs provide emotional support and refer to psychology the most severe cases, while psychologists provide one-to-one consultations. Significant limitations in the care provided are discussed.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite their high prevalence and significant burden, mental disorders such as depression remain largely underdiagnosed and undertreated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Allillanchu Project was to design, develop, and test an intervention to promote early detection, opportune referral, and access to treatment of patients with mental disorders attending public primary health care (PHC) services in Lima, Peru. METHODS: The project had a multiphase design: formative study, development of intervention components, and implementation. The intervention combined three strategies: training of PHC providers (PHCPs), task shifting the detection and referral of mental disorders, and a mobile health (mHealth) component comprising a screening app followed by motivational and reminder short message service (SMS) to identify at-risk patients. The intervention was implemented by 22 PHCPs from five health centers, working in antenatal care, tuberculosis, chronic diseases, and HIV or AIDS services. RESULTS: Over a period of 9 weeks, from September 2015 to November 2015, 733 patients were screened by the 22 PHCPs during routine consultations, and 762 screening were completed in total. The chronic diseases (49.9%, 380/762) and antenatal care services (36.7%, 380/762) had the higher number of screenings. Time constraints and workload were the main barriers to implementing the screening, whereas the use of technology, training, and supervision of the PHCPs by the research team were identified as facilitators. Of the 733 patients, 21.7% (159/733) screened positively and were advised to seek specialized care. Out of the 159 patients with a positive screening result, 127 had a follow-up interview, 72.4% (92/127) reported seeking specialized care, and 55.1% (70/127) stated seeing a specialist. Both patients and PHCPs recognized the utility of the screening and identified some key challenges to its wider implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a screening app supported by training and supervision is feasible and uncovers a high prevalence of unidentified psychological symptoms in primary care. To increase its sustainability and utility, this procedure can be incorporated into the routine practices of existing health care services, following tailoring to the resources and features of each service. The early detection of psychological symptoms by a PHCP within a regular consultation, followed by adequate advice and support, can lead to a significant percentage of patients accessing specialized care and reducing the treatment gap of mental disorders.

Asunto(s)