RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multicentre cohort study investigates the effect of smoking on the outcome of rotator cuff repair (RCR), with attention to age at presentation for surgery, pre-operative and post-operative pain and function and intra-operative findings. METHODS: Patient information was collected pre-operatively, including Flex Shoulder Function (Flex SF) and visual analogue scale pain, then at 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-operatively. Intra-operative technical data were collected by the operating surgeon. Current smokers were classified by daily cigarette consumption. RESULTS: A total of 1383 RCRs in as many patients were included with an 84% 5-year follow-up. Smokers were on average 6.7 years younger than non-smokers (51.8 vs. 58.5, P < 0.001). There was no difference in intra-operatively assessed tear size both in anteroposterior dimension (P = 0.5) and retraction (P = 0.9). Pre-operative Flex SF score in smokers was below that of non-smokers (23.0 vs. 24.5, P = 0.002) and at 6 months (P = 0.02) but no different at 5 years (P = 0.7). Pain scores were higher in smokers than non-smokers both pre-operatively (5.34 vs. 4.67, P < 0.001) and up to 2 years (P < 0.001) but not at 5 years (P = 0.073). CONCLUSION: Smokers undergoing RCR were younger than non-smokers, and had worse pre-operative pain scores and shoulder function. Poorer post-operative function persisted to 6 months, and with higher reported pain to 2 years in smokers. However, at 5-year follow-up, patient-reported outcomes were not affected by smoking status.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Manguito de los Rotadores , Artroscopía , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Fumar/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited medium- and long-term studies investigating clinical outcomes following revision rotator cuff surgery. The aim of the current study was to analyze the medium-term pain and functional outcomes of a cohort of revision rotator cuff repairs. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of revision rotator cuff repairs undertaken between March 2009 and December 2010. Pain, function (Flex-SF), and postoperative data were collected at baseline; 6, 12, and 24 months; and 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 125 revision rotator cuff repairs were included in this study. Average improvement in Flex-SF and pain from baseline to 5 years was 8.5 (P < .001) and 2.1 points, respectively (P < .001). The improvement was not as pronounced as those who underwent primary repair. Significantly lower pain scores were seen in nonsmokers (P < .001) and in those who underwent tenotomy rather than tenodesis (2 vs. 3.5, P < .05) for a damaged long head of biceps. Significantly higher function scores were seen in those with only 1 tendon involved (P < .05). The patient-reported retear rate was 32.6%, and the reoperation rate was 34.7%. CONCLUSION: Revision rotator cuff repair provides significant improvement in both pain and function at 5 years postoperation, though not as good as primary repair. Superior clinical outcomes are seen in nonsmokers, those with only 1 tendon affected, and those who undergo tenotomy instead of tenodesis for a damaged long head of biceps tendon.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia , Artroscopía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Tenodesis , Tenotomía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The New Zealand Rotator Cuff Registry was established in 2009 to collect prospective functional, pain and outcome data on patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: Information collected included an operation day technical questionnaire completed by the surgeon and Flex Shoulder Function (SF) functional and pain scores preoperatively, immediately post-operatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months. A multivariate analysis was performed analysing the three surgical approaches to determine if there was a difference in pain or functional outcome scores. RESULTS: A total of 2418 RCRs were included in this paper. There were 418 (17.3%) arthroscopic, 956 (39.5%) mini-open and 1044 (43.2%) open procedures. Twenty-four-month follow-up data were obtained for pain and Flex SF in 71% of patients. At 24 months, there was no difference in the average Flex SF score for the arthroscopic, mini-open and open groups. There was no difference in improvement in Flex SF score at 24 months. At 24 months, there was no difference in mean pain scores. There was no difference in improvement in pain score from preoperation to 24 months. Most patients returned to work within 3 months of surgery, with no difference between the three surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: RCR has good to excellent outcomes in terms of improvement in pain and function at 2-year follow-up. We found no difference in pain or functional outcome at 24 months between arthroscopic, open and mini-open approaches for RCR.