Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(9): 1246-1249, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28395563

RESUMEN

The optimal threshold for neonatal platelet transfusions in sick newborns is still uncertain. We report a congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in a premature neonate with severe thrombocytopenia who subsequently presented with necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal bleeding. The baby recovered after platelet transfusions were discontinued and the therapy was switched from intravenous ganciclovir to oral valganciclovir. We discuss both measures, speculating on the key role of platelet transfusions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Enfermedades del Prematuro/virología , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Trombocitopenia/virología , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Cesárea , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/complicaciones , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/terapia , Femenino , Ganciclovir/administración & dosificación , Ganciclovir/análogos & derivados , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Prematuro/terapia , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Valganciclovir
2.
World J Clin Pediatr ; 5(4): 358-364, 2016 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27872823

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate whether serial physical examinations (SPEs) are a safe tool for managing neonates at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of neonates (≥ 34 wks' gestation) delivered in three high-volume level IIIbirthing centres in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) during a 4-mo period (from September 1 to December 31, 2015). Neonates at risk for EOS were managed according to the SPEs strategy, these were carried out in turn by bedside nursing staff and physicians. A standardized form detailing general wellbeing, skin colour and vital signs was filled in and signed at standard intervals (at age 3, 6, 12, 18, 36 and 48 h) in neonates at risk for EOS. Three independent reviewers reviewed all charts of neonates and abstracted data (gestational age, mode of delivery, group B streptococcus status, risk factors for EOS, duration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, postpartum evaluations, therapies and outcome). Rates of sepsis workups, empirical antibiotics and outcome of neonates at-risk (or not) for EOS were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 2092 live births and 1 culture-proven EOS (Haemophilus i) (incidence rates of 0.48/1000 live births). Most newborns with signs of illness (51 out of 101, that is 50.5%), and most of those who received postpartum antibiotics (17 out of 29, that is 58.6%) were not at risk for EOS. Compared to neonates at risk, neonates not at risk for EOS were less likely to have signs of illness (51 out of 1442 vs 40 out of 650, P = 0.009) or have a sepsis workup (25 out of 1442 vs 28 out of 650, P < 0.001). However, they were not less likely to receive empirical antibiotics (17 out of 1442 vs 12 out of 650, P = 0.3). Thirty-two neonates were exposed to intrapartum fever or chorioamnionitis: 62.5% (n = 20) had a sepsis workup and 21.9% (n = 7) were given empirical antibiotics. Among 216 neonates managed through the SPEs strategy, only 5.6% (n = 12) had subsequently a sepsis workup and only 1.9% (n = 4) were given empirical antibiotics. All neonates managed through SPEs had a normal outcome. Among 2092 neonates, only 1.6% (n = 34) received antibiotics; 1.4% (n = 29) were ill and 0.2% (n = 5) were asymptomatic (they were treated because of risk factors for EOS). CONCLUSION: The SPEs strategy reduces unnecessary laboratory evaluations and antibiotics, and apparently does not worsen the outcome of neonates at-risk or neonates with mild, equivocal, transient symptoms.

3.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 13(11): 1387-99, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26295167

RESUMEN

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal bacterial infections in developed countries. Early-onset disease (EOD) occurs at day 0-6 and late-onset disease occurs at day 7-89. Currently, the prevention of EOD relies upon intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) given to women who are GBS positive at prenatal screening or women with risk factors for EOD. Although successfully implemented, IAP has not fully eradicated EOD, and incidence rates of late-onset disease remain unchanged. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance may result from widespread antibiotic use. New prophylactic strategies are therefore of critical importance. A vaccine active against GBS, administered during pregnancy and combined with targeted IAP, could overcome these problems and reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with invasive diseases.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus agalactiae , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Factores de Riesgo , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA