RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The purpose of this study was to identify possible associated factors that may have contributed to failure to detect a pancreatic neoplasm during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examinations by experienced endosonographers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was organized, and 20 cases of pancreatic neoplasms missed by nine experienced endosonographers were identified. Careful analysis of each case was carried out to identify the factors that might have led to the missed diagnosis on EUS. RESULTS: Twelve patients with a missed pancreatic neoplasm had EUS features of chronic pancreatitis. Other factors that might have increased the likelihood of a false-negative EUS examination included a diffusely infiltrating carcinoma (n = 3), a prominent ventral/dorsal split (n = 2), and a recent episode (within the previous 4 weeks) of acute pancreatitis (n = 1). Five patients with a negative initial EUS underwent a follow-up EUS after 2-3 months, with a pancreatic mass being found in all cases. Three patients had a diffusely infiltrating pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is not a foolproof method of detecting a pancreatic neoplasm. Possible associated factors that may increase the likelihood of a false-negative EUS examination include chronic pancreatitis, a diffusely infiltrating carcinoma, a prominent ventral/dorsal split and a recent episode (< 4 weeks) of acute pancreatitis. If there is a high clinical suspicion of pancreatic neoplasm, if EUS and other imaging methods are negative, and if the patient does not undergo surgery, this study suggests that a repeat EUS after 2-3 months may be useful for detecting an occult pancreatic neoplasm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) afflicts approximately 1% to 5% of patients after cholecystectomy. The diagnostic standard for SOD is sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), a technically difficult, invasive test that is frequently complicated by pancreatitis. A sensitive and accurate noninvasive imaging modality is thus needed for the diagnosis of SOD. Quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and fatty meal sonography (EMS) are frequently used for this purpose, but results vary. This study compared SOM, HBS, and EMS in the diagnosis of SOD in a large group of patients. METHODS: Three hundred four consecutive patients after cholecystectomy (38 men, 266 women, age 17-72 years) suspected to have SOD were evaluated by SOM, FMS, and HBS. SOM was considered abnormal if any of the following were observed: (1) increased basal pressure (greater than 40 mm Hg), (2) increased phasic activity with amplitude greater than 350 mm Hg, (3) frequency of contractions greater than 8 per minute, (4) greater than 50% of propagation sequences retrograde, and (5) paradoxical response to cholecystokinin. FMS was considered abnormal if ductal dilation was greater than 2 mm at 45 minutes after fatty meal ingestion. Quantitative HBS was performed with sequential images obtained every 5 minutes for 90 minutes to monitor excretion of the radionuclide. Time-to-peak, halftime, and downslope were calculated according to predetermined ranges. RESULTS: A diagnosis of SOD was made in 73 patients (24%) by using SOM as the reference standard. HBS was abnormal in 86 whereas EMS was abnormal in 22 patients. A true-positive result was obtained in 15 patients by EMS and 36 patients with HBS. EMS and HBS gave false-positive results, respectively, in 7 and 50 patients. Sensitivity of EMS was 21% and for HBS 49%, whereas specificities were 97% and 78%, respectively. EMS, HBS, or both were abnormal in 90% of patients with Geenen-Hogan Type I SOD, 50% with Type II, and 44% of Type III. Of the 73 patients who underwent sphincterotomy, 40 had a long-term response. Of those with SOD, 11 of 13 patients (85%) with an abnormal HBS and EMS had a good long-term response. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the largest reported to date, correlation of FMS and HBS with SOM in the diagnosis of SOD was poor. When HBS and EMS are used together, a slight increase in sensitivity can be expected. The accuracy of EMS and HBS in the diagnosis of SOD decreases across the spectrum from Type I to Type III SOD. EMS and HBS, nonetheless, may by of assistance in predicting long-term response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal cancers are common in the elderly. In the 1990s, modest advances in the early diagnosis, staging, and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers were made. Emphasis has been placed on screening for colorectal cancer; development of new diagnostic and staging modalities, particularly endoscopic ultrasound; and introduction of new treatment regimens, such as chemoradiation programs for esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers as well as endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastrointestinal cancers. New palliative techniques, such as laser and photodynamic therapy and placement of enteral stents, are being used increasingly in patients who have advanced cancer and are not surgical candidates. In the past, attitudes toward the elderly affected the management of cancer. Age should not be the only parameter considered when addressing the treatment of a gastrointestinal malignancy. Management decisions in the elderly should follow the same principles as those in younger patients. A thorough medical evaluation in the elderly is necessary to evaluate the patient's risk and to optimize surgical, chemotherapeutic, and palliative outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Currently there is no available therapy to prevent attacks of acute pancreatitis in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (IRP). This randomized, nonblinded prospective, controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stents in preventing attacks of pancreatitis in IRP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 5-year period 34 patients met the diagnostic criteria for IRP. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups; 19 patients (14 women, 5 men, mean age 44) to the pancreatic stent group; and 15 patients (10 women, five men, mean age 47) to the control group. The stent group received three stents over a period of 1 year and the control group had selective pancreatograms but no stent. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range 13-77) and 35 months (range 10-78) in the stent and control groups, respectively. Episodes of pancreatitis, frequency and intensity of pain requiring emergency room visits, and hospitalizations were recorded. RESULTS: Recurrence of pancreatitis occurred in eight out of 15 patients (53%) in the control group, but in only two our of 19 patients (11%) in the stent group (P<0.02). Two patients in the control group who had recurrences of pancreatitis crossed over to stent therapy and had no further pancreatitis thereafter. Six patients each, 32% and 40% in the stent and control groups respectively, continued to have pancreatic type pain. In the study period 17 stents were occluded and 14 migrated out. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that pancreatic duct stenting may prevent recurrent attacks of pancreatitis in IRP patients. Intermittent pancreatic duct sphincter dysfunction or relative outlet obstruction may be the underlying cause for the recurrent attacks of pancreatitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a minimally invasive, low risk method of diagnosis for chronic pancreatitis (CP). The degree to which endosonographers agree on the features and diagnosis of CP is unknown. For EUS to be considered an accurate test for CP, there must be good interobserver agreement. METHODS: Forty-five pancreatic EUS examinations were videotaped by 3 experienced endosonographers. Examinations from 33 patients with suspected CP based on typical symptoms, as well as 12 control patients without suspected CP, were included. Eleven experienced endosonographers ("experts") who were blinded to clinical information independently evaluated all videotaped examinations for the presence of CP and the following 9 validated features of CP: echogenic foci, strands, lobularity, cysts, stones, duct dilatation, duct irregularity, hyperechoic duct margins, and visible side branches. The experts also ranked (most to least) which features they believed to be the most indicative of CP. Interobserver agreement was expressed as the kappa (kappa) statistic. RESULTS: There was moderately good overall agreement for the final diagnosis of CP (kappa = 0.45). Agreement was good for individual features of duct dilatation (kappa = 0.6) and lobularity (kappa = 0.51) but poor for the other 7 features (kappa < 0.4). The expert panel had consensus or near consensus agreement (greater than 90%) on 206 of 450 (46%) individual EUS features including 22 of 45 diagnoses of CP. Agreement on the final diagnosis of CP was moderately good for those trained in third tier fellowships (kappa = 0.42 +/- 0.03) and those with more than 1100 lifetime pancreatic EUS examinations (kappa = 0.46 +/- 0.05). The presence of stones was regarded as the most predictive feature of CP by all endosonographers, followed by visible side branches, cysts, lobularity, irregular main pancreatic duct, hyperechoic foci, hyperechoic strands, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and main duct hyperechoic margins. The most common diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of CP was the total number of features (median 4 or greater, range 3 or greater to 5 or greater). CONCLUSIONS: EUS is a reliable method for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with good interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Agreement on the EUS diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is comparable to other commonly used endoscopic procedures such as bleeding ulcer stigmata and computed tomography of the brain for stroke localization and better than the physical diagnosis of heart sounds.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current standard treatment of bleeding esophageal varices is band ligation. Although endoscopic sclerotherapy has largely been supplanted by band ligation, there are still clinical situations in which injection methods are useful. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may allow for a more complete evaluation of esophageal varices and perforating veins and may allow for more effective delivery of sclerosant. Our aim was to evaluate the use of color Doppler EUS-guided sclerotherapy for the obliteration of esophageal varices. METHODS: Five patients with esophageal varices (Child's A = 1, B = 2, C = 2) underwent dynamic EUS-guided sclerotherapy with color flow Doppler. EUS sclerotherapy was performed using Varijet (2.5 mm catheter) injector needles and sodium morrhuate directed at the perforating vessels until flow was completely impeded (2 to 4 mL per injection site). Data collected included (1) sessions to obliteration, (2) episodes of recurrent bleeding, (3) complications, and (4) mortality. RESULTS: Patients undergoing EUS-sclerotherapy required 2.2 sessions to achieve obliteration of varices. No patient had a recurrence of bleeding and no deaths occurred. One patient developed an esophageal stricture that responded to balloon dilation. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic EUS-guided sclerotherapy with color flow Doppler may be safely and effectively used for the treatment of esophageal varices. It allows for effective delivery of sclerosant with favorable outcomes. Prospective, multicenter, randomized trials are warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endosonography (EUS) is the most accurate modality for assessing depth of tumor invasion and local lymph node metastasis. However, its accuracy in the identification of metastatic (celiac axis) lymph nodes is less well defined. Our objective in this study was to determine the accuracy of Eus in detecting celiac axis lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent preoperative EUS. Of these, 145 underwent attempted surgical resection and staging, and 4 underwent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal and celiac lymph nodes. Local (mediastinal) and distant (celiac axis) lymph nodes were assessed for malignancy on the basis of four criteria (larger than 1 cm, round, homogeneous echo pattern, sharp borders). Accuracy of EUS was determined by means of correlating histopathologic findings for the resected lymph nodes or results of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination. RESULTS: Surgical exploration (n = 145) and fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination (n = 4) revealed metastatic celiac axis lymph nodes in 23 and metastatic mediastinal (local) lymph nodes in 93 of 149 patients with esophageal carcinoma. According to defined criteria for malignant lymph nodes, there were 19 true-positive and 4 falsenegative results. Sensitivity for the diagnosis of celiac lymph node metastasis with EUS was 83% with a 98% specificity. For the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 63%. All patients with malignant celiac axis lymph nodes had local T3 (tumor breaching adventitia) or T4 (tumor invading adjacent organs) disease. CONCLUSION: EUS is an excellent modality in the evaluation of metastatic celiac axis lymph nodes in patients with esophageal carcinoma. These findings should be used in selecting options for treatment. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy is consistent with that of prior studies, and local and regional lymph nodes and specificity is significantly higher.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ability to identify common bile duct stones by noninvasive means in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis is limited. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the ability of endosonography (EUS) to identify cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis and predict disease severity in patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis. METHODS: EUS was performed immediately before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by separate blinded examiners within 72 hours of admission. Gallbladder findings were compared between EUS and transabdominal ultrasonography (US). Using endoscopic extraction of a bile duct stone as the reference standard for choledocholithiasis, the diagnostic yield of EUS was compared with transabdominal US and ERCP. Features identified during endosonographic imaging of the pancreas were correlated with length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were studied. EUS and transabdominal US were concordant in their interpretation of gallbladder findings in 92% of patients. The sensitivity of transabdominal US, EUS, and ERCP for identifying choledocholithiasis was 50%, 91%, and 92% and the accuracy was 83%, 97%, and 89%, respectively. Length of hospital stay was longer in patients with peripancreatic fluid (9.2 vs. 5.7 days, p < 0.1) and shorter in patients with coarse echo texture (2.6 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.05) demonstrated on EUS. CONCLUSIONS: EUS can reliably identify cholelithiasis and is more sensitive than transabdominal US in detecting choledocholithiasis in patients with biliary pancreatitis. EUS may be used early in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis to select those who would benefit from endoscopic stone extraction. The utility of EUS for predicting pancreatitis severity requires further investigation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of incomplete pancreas divisum (IPD) has not been fully described. In this study we report the clinical presentation and results of endoscopic treatment of the 32 (0.6%) patients with IPD seen at our center over a 10-year period. METHODS: The study population consisted of 24 women and 8 men (mean age 42 years, range 13 to 82 years). Ten (31%) patients presented with acute recurrent pancreatitis, 5 (16%) with chronic pancreatitis, and 3 (9%) with pancreatic type pain. Detailed history, laboratory tests, US, CT, and ERCP excluded other etiologies for their symptoms. The remaining 14 (44%) presented with biliary problems. The 18 symptomatic patients with IPD were treated as follows: 8 received dorsal duct stents, 3 underwent minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy and dorsal duct stent placement, 4 had minor papilla dilatation only, and 3 had ventral duct stents placed. RESULTS: Patients were then followed for recurrence of pancreatitis and pancreatic-type pain. Mean follow-up was 15.5 months (range 3 to 30 months). Six (60%) of the patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis and 4 (80%) with chronic pancreatitis benefitted from the endoscopic therapy. However, only 1 (33%) of the patients with pancreatic-type pain benefitted. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation and response to endoscopic therapy of patients with ICP appeared to be similar to that of patients with complete pancreas divisum.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive disorders of the pancreas, including strictures, stones, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and pancreas divisum, are diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Conventional extracorporeal ultrasound with secretin stimulation has been used as a noninvasive study to detect obstruction and predict outcome of therapy. Inconsistent results have been obtained because of the inherent limitations of standard ultrasonography. The aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of the main pancreatic duct by endoscopic ultrasonography during secretin stimulation and to diagnose obstructive disorders of the pancreas. METHODS: Secretin-stimulated endoscopic ultrasound (SSEUS, 1 IU/kg secretin) was performed in 20 control subjects (no pancreatic or biliary disease), 40 patients with symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, 40 patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum, 20 patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and 20 patients with suspected occlusion of pancreatic duct stents. Ductal diameter was measured by endoscopic ultrasonography at baseline and at 1-minute intervals, after administration of secretin, for 15 minutes. A result was determined to be abnormal when a 1 mm or greater dilation of the pancreatic duct was observed from baseline after secretin administration. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients with symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, SSEUS correctly predicted obstructive pathology (stones, strictures) in 12 of 13 patients (92%). Of the 40 patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum, 22 underwent stent therapy (16 of 22 with resolution of symptoms). SSEUS accurately predicted response to stent therapy in 13 patients (81%). Seven of twenty patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction had abnormal sphincter manometry. SSEUS accurately predicted sphincter dysfunction in only 4 of 7 patients (57%). Finally, 20 patients with suspected occlusion of pancreatic duct stents were studied. Of the 14 stent occlusions confirmed at ERCP, SSEUS correctly predicted premature occlusion in 12 patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS: SSEUS appears to be a useful diagnostic modality in the evaluation of patients with suspected obstructive disorders of the pancreas and it can predict which patients may respond to endoscopic therapy.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis in its early stages may defy diagnosis despite existing diagnostic modalities. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP), secretin test, and conventional ultrasound are insensitive in detecting the early stages of chronic pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to determine whether endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) high-resolution imaging allows for the detection of chronic pancreatitis as compared with clinical history, ERCP, and secretin test. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with recurrent pancreatitis underwent ERCP, EUS, and secretin test. EUS evaluated parenchymal changes: echogenic foci (calcification), prominent interlobular septae (fibrosis), small cystic cavities (edema), lobulated outer gland margin (fibrosis/atrophy), and heterogeneous parenchyma; and ductal changes: dilation, irregularity, echogenic wall (fibrosis), side-branch ectasia, and echogenic foci (stones). EUS criteria for chronic pancreatitis included mild (1 to 2 features), moderate (3 to 5 features), and severe (more than 5 features). RESULTS: Abnormal studies were EUS = 63, ERCP = 36, and secretin test = 25. Secretin test had 100% agreement with normal and severe chronic pancreatitis by EUS criteria, but agreement was poor for mild (13%) and moderate (50%) disease. Alternatively, the agreement between ERCP- and EUS-specific criteria was excellent for normal (100%), moderate (92%), and severe (100%) chronic pancreatitis and poor for mild (17%) disease. When the 2-test modality (ERCP and secretin test) was compared with EUS alone, no enhancement in agreement was seen. CONCLUSION: Using the above criteria EUS may assist in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis not established by ERCP or secretin test. Excellent agreement can be expected between EUS and ERCP in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with the exception of mild changes noted on EUS (kappa statistics = 0.82: 95% CI [0.70, 0.95]). Long-term follow-up of the patients with mild EUS changes will determine the validity of EUS in diagnosing the early stages of chronic pancreatitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proximal migration of a biliary or pancreatic stent is an infrequent event but its management can be technically challenging. METHODS: Review of all cases of proximally migrated biliary and pancreatic stents over a 10-year period at a referral pancreatic-biliary center. Data abstracted from patient records included indication for stenting, method of presentation, success of attempt, and method used. Successful methods were determined by reviewing procedure reports. Follow-up was attempted in all patients in whom stent retrieval had failed. RESULTS: Thirty-three proximally migrated bile duct stents, and 26 proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents were identified. Most of the patients were without symptoms. Eighty-five percent of common bile duct stents and 80% of pancreatic duct stents were successfully extracted endoscopically. Seventy-one percent (34 of 48) were retrieved with a basket or balloon. Of the stents not retrieved, two patients did not return for repeat ERCP, three patients with malignant common bile duct strictures were managed with placement of a second stent, three patients with pancreatic duct stents have remained without symptoms with no further retrieval attempts, and three patients with proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents required surgery because of pain and failure of multiple endoscopic retrieval attempts. CONCLUSION: Over 80% of proximally migrated bile duct and pancreatic duct stents may be extracted endoscopically. Few patients will require surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Approximately 2-7% of patients who have undergone previous removal of bile duct stones have recurrence often presenting as ascending cholangitis. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence, clinical presentation, and objective findings in this group of patients. Additionally, the effect of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in preventing cholangitis, was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two thousand and ninety-six patients who underwent ERCP for cholelithiasis were studied with 45 of these patients being identified as having recurrent common bile duct stones. Of the 45, 13 had two or more recurrences without having any obvious predisposing factors. The mean age of the 13 patients was 57 years. The characteristics of 13 patients were reviewed, including sphincterotomy size, liver function tests, and contrast drainage time. RESULTS: All 13 patients with recurrent stones presented with ascending cholangitis. Stones were found to be soft, brown and accompanied by a large amount of sludge. The common bile duct in all 13 patients was noted to be dilated and had notable, widely patent sphincterotomes. There was significant delayed drainage in 77% of these patients. Yearly surveillance ERCPs were performed in the 13 patients, the incidence of acute cholangitis episodes per patient decreased from 2 to 0.6 with a four-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a subgroup of patients with multiple common bile duct stone recurrences, annual surveillance ERCP with stone removal decreases the incidence of recurrent episodes of ascending cholangitis as well as its associated morbidity and mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Glucagon is often used to inhibit duodenal motility and enhance cannulation during ERCP. Levsin is an antimuscarinic, anticholinergic agent that may be as effective as glucagon. METHODS: Three hundred eight patients requiring an antimotility agent during ERCP were randomized in a double-blind prospective study to intravenous Levsin or glucagon. Parameters recorded included difficulty of procedure, predrug and postdrug motility grade, effectiveness of medication, patients requiring "crossover" drug, side effects, and cost per case. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were randomized to glucagon and 155 to Levsin. The two groups were equally matched with regard to patient and procedure characteristics. Of statistical significance were the following: (1) 12 patients in the Levsin group required crossover compared to 1 patient in the glucagon group, (2) Levsin was slightly less effective in inhibiting motility, but this did not adversely influence procedure difficulty, (3) Levsin was associated with more minor side effects (nausea, vomiting, and pain) at 2 hours after the procedure (Levsin 36 of 143, glucagon 24 of 152, p = 0.045) but there was no difference in pancreatitis (glucagon 6, Levsin 8), (4) Levsin was associated with a significant cost advantage (Levsin $10.45/case, glucagon $29.51/case, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Levsin may provide a reasonable alternative antimotility agent during ERCP. Levsin does not appear to alter the rate of significant postprocedure complications. The cost benefit advantage appears to be substantial.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Endoscopic ultrasonography is a relatively new and evolving imaging modality incorporating endoscopy and ultrasonography into one comprehensive examination of the gut wall. Its principal indication has been the locoregional staging (T and N) of gastrointestinal tumors, particularly of the esophagus and stomach. Accuracy of conventional radiographic modalities (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) has been disappointing (50-60%). Alternatively, the staging accuracy of the depth of tumor penetration (T stage) approaches 85-90% in most series, whereas that for lymph node assessment (N stage) has been in the 70-80% range. The precise stage of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms provides accurate pretreatment assessment of the patient's prognosis and may influence therapeutic decisions. Endosonography is also the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of submucosal tumors. It can demonstrate size, layer of origin, and, by its echo texture, can accurately predict etiology of the neoplasm. The only limitation may be in the differentiation of benign from malignant smooth muscle tumors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma is well established. Alternatively, the role of EUS in the early diagnosis of anastomotic recurrence is less well accepted. METHODS: EUS was used to evaluate 30 asymptomatic and 10 symptomatic patients (i.e., with dysphagia) who had previously undergone resection of esophageal carcinoma. RESULTS: There were 3 (10%) unsuspected anastomotic recurrences in the asymptomatic group. EUS correctly identified locally recurrent cancer in all cases, whereas endoscopy confirmed the presence of only one anastomotic recurrence. Computed tomography was not diagnostic in any of the three recurrences. Sensitivity of EUS for recurrence of esophageal carcinoma was 100% compared with 33% for endoscopic diagnosis while the specificity was 96% for EUS compared with 100% for endoscopic biopsy. There was one false positive diagnosis of recurrence by EUS because of postoperative fibrosis resulting in concentric hypertrophy of the esophageal wall near the surgical anastomosis. Of the 10 symptomatic patients, 4 were diagnosed with tumor recurrence. EUS correctly predicted recurrences in all symptomatic patients (100% sensitivity and specificity), as did upper endoscopy with biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is more sensitive than upper endoscopy and CT scan for the evaluation of anastomotic recurrence of esophageal carcinoma and should be considered as an adjunctive modality to conventional endoscopy for the postoperative surveillance of these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis frequently complicates diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. A variety of causes have been implicated. A number of different agents have been used, without success, in an attempt to prevent pancreatitis. METHODS: In the current study, 824 patients with a history of iodine sensitivity were given preprocedure corticosteroid therapy (651 oral steroids and 173 intravenous steroids) in an attempt to prevent allergic reactions. These patients were retrospectively studied in an attempt to determine if corticosteroid administration prevents ERCP-related pancreatitis. Two control groups were used for comparison, including 1000 patients during the same study period (Control Group I) and 1954 patients from the Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Group (Control Group II). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the corticosteroid treated group (4.6%) compared with either control group (Control Group I = 7.4% and Control Group II = 9.1%). Of those patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP, results were even more significant in favor of the steroid-treated group (5.2%) compared with Control Group I (9.7%) and Control Group II (11.2%). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the administration of corticosteroids prior to ERCP results in a decreased incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial is warranted.

Asunto(s)