RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have indicated the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids) as a method of pediatric nutrition screening with good validity in the hospital setting. However, we need to analyze whether the cutoff values originally proposed are suitable for use in Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients admitted to the pediatric ward of a public hospital. STRONGkids was used to assess nutrition risk (low risk, 0 points; moderate risk, 1-3 points; and high risk, 4-5 points). The indexes weight/height or body mass index/age were used to indicate acute malnutrition, and length or height/age was used to indicate chronic malnutrition. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and the areas under the curve were calculated, with respective 95% confidence intervals, to assess the ability of STRONGkids to predict malnutrition and longer hospital stay. RESULTS: The study included 599 patients, with a median age of 2.6 years. The frequency of nutrition risk (medium or high) was 83.6%. In comparison with anthropometric indexes, STRONGkids was the only scoring system with the discriminatory capacity to identify patients with longer hospital stays. The comparative analysis of the means of hospital stay according to STRONGkids showed that patients with a score equal to 3 behaved similarly to those classified as high nutrition risk (4-5 points). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the best cutoff point to predict prolonged hospitalization, STRONGkids used in Brazil should consider patients with 3 points as having high nutrition risk, as well those scoring 4 and 5.
Asunto(s)
Desnutrición , Pediatría , Brasil , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado NutricionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of StrongKids as a pediatric nutritional screening tool in Brazil, which has no validated method for this purpose. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 641 patients admitted to the pediatric care unit of a public hospital from 2014 to 2018. The concurrent validity was assessed by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values of StrongKids in detecting acute, chronic, and overall malnutrition. Predictive validity was determined by calculating the same indices to identify longer than median hospital stay, need of enteral nutrition, 30-day hospital readmission, transfer to hospitals with more complex procedures, and death. StrongKids was reapplied to a subsample to evaluate the inter-rater reproducibility. RESULTS: Prevalence of low risk was 15.6%, moderate risk was 63.7%, and high nutritional risk was 20.7%. A positive test, corresponding to the moderate or high risk category, identified all those with acute malnutrition and showed sensitivity of 89.4% (95% CI: 76.9-96.4) and 94.0% (95% CI: 86.6-98.0) for the detection of chronic and overall malnutrition, respectively. Regarding its predictive capacity, 100% of the patients who needed enteral nutrition, who were transferred, died, or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days after discharge were considered in risk by StrongKids, and the sensitivity to identify those with prolonged hospital stays was 89.2 (95% CI: 84.6-92.7). The inter-rater agreement was excellent (PABAK: 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: StrongKids had satisfactory validity and reproducibility and successfully identified nutritional deficits and predict unfavorable health outcomes. Our results support the use of StrongKids as a pediatric nutritional risk screening method in Brazil.
Asunto(s)
Desnutrición , Evaluación Nutricional , Brasil , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Estado Nutricional , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence and associated factors with general and central adiposity in older adults in Palmas (TO).Methods: Cross-sectional study with older adults (≥60 years) of both sexes enrolled in the Family Health Strategy program in Palmas (TO). Sociodemographic aspects, health conditions, and functionality were evaluated as independent variables and Body Mass Index (BMI) for general adiposity and Waist Circumference (WC) for central adiposity as dependent variables. Descriptive analysis and hierarchical multiple Poisson regression with robust variance were performed.Results: A total of 449 seniors (50.6% women) from 60 to 92 years of age, average of 68.3 years, were evaluated. The prevalence of general adiposity was 46.8% (95% CI: 42.2%-51.4%) and central adiposity was 78.8% (95% CI: 74.7%-82.3%). The prevalence of both outcomes was significantly higher among women and the participants with a history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and rheumatic diseases and those dependent in activities of daily living (ADL) than among men. Lower frequency of adiposity (general and central) was found with increasing age. After adjustment, the prevalence of both outcomes was significantly higher in women aged 70-79 years and hypertensive.Conclusions: The results of this study confirm the need to establish nutritional status monitoring and direct obesity prevention and control interventions in programs to promote health and quality of life of older adults and those in the stages prior to old age.