RESUMEN
La presencia de cuerpo extraño esofágico (CEE) es una urgencia habitual en gastroenterología. El protocolo en el manejo y la intervención endoscópica puede ser variable entre las instituciones. Objetivo: Definir características clínicas del CEE en adultos, su diagnóstico radiológico y endoscópico, y complicaciones a partir de una muestra de pacientes en un centro de gastroenterología. Materiales y métodos: serie de casos de pacientes que ingresaron desde urgencias y fueron interconsultados al servicio de gastroenterología con diagnóstico presuntivo de CEE. Se recolectaron variables clínicas, así como características, comorbilidades, tiempo de evolución y oportunidad diagnóstica, estudios confirmatorios, y complicaciones. Resultados: 84 sujetos, 70% hombres, promedio de edad 45 (rango:17-87; SD 12,5) años. En 98,8% de los pacientes se realizó endoscopía digestiva alta de modo urgente, con estancia intrahospitalaria promedio de 2,5 días. 93% sin patología de base asociada, en 6/84 (7,14%) pacientes se documentó patología esofágica estructural o funcional. 59/84 70,2%) pacientes consultaron en las primeras 24 horas, en 57,6% se confirmó endoscópicamente presencia de cuerpo extraño. En 67/84 (79,76%) pacientes se realizó radiografía previa a endoscopia, de los cuales, 62/67 (92,5%) con resultado anormal. 70% de los CEE confirmados fueron espinas de pescado. El sitio más frecuente de localización fue en región cricofaringea en el 90% de los casos. En 66/84 (78,6%) sujetos hubo ausencia de complicaciones, seguido de laceración profunda en 10/84 (11,9%) casos. En 3/84 (3,6%) casos se identificaron complicaciones con requerimiento quirúrgico. Conclusiones: La intervención endoscópica en las primeras 24 horas es un momento oportuno para identificación de complicaciones y brindar el tratamiento indicado.
The presence of esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. The protocol for management and endoscopic intervention can be variable among institutions. Objective: to define the clinical characteristics of EFB in adults, its radiological and endoscopic diagnosis, and complications based on a sample of patients in a gastroenterology center. Materials and methods: case series of patients admitted from the emergency department and referred to the gastroenterology department with a presumptive diagnosis of EFB. Clinical variables were collected, as well as characteristics, comorbidities, time of evolution and diagnostic opportunity, confirmatory studies, and complications. Results: 84 subjects, 70% men, mean age 45 (range: 17-87; SD 12.5) years. Urgent upper endoscopy was performed in 98.8% of the patients, with an average in-hospital stay of 2.5 days. 93% had no associated underlying pathology, in 6/84 (7.14%) patients structural or functional esophageal pathology was documented. 59/84 (70.2%) patients consulted in the first 24 hours, in 57.6% the presence of foreign body was confirmed endoscopically. In 67/84 (79.76%) patients radiography was performed prior to endoscopy, of which 62/67 (92.5%) had an abnormal result. Seventy percent of confirmed EFB were fish bones. The most frequent site of localization was in the cricopharyngeal region in 90% of the cases. In 66/84 (78.6%) subjects there was absence of complications, followed by deep laceration in 10/84 (11.9%) cases. In 3/84 (3.6%) cases complications requiring surgery were identified. Conclusions: Endoscopic intervention in the first 24 hours is an opportune moment to identify complications and provide the indicated treatment.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage and luminal-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are the options for managing symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LAMS for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts in two referral centers in Colombia. Materials and methods: A multicenter prospective cohort study between June 2019 and December 2021 included 13 patients diagnosed with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent EUS-guided drainage with LAMS. Technical success, clinical success, and successful stent removal were evaluated as outcomes. Safety outcomes included stent-related adverse events and general adverse events. Follow-up was carried out for eight weeks, collecting data on stent removal. Results: The average age was 53.4 years; 8/13 were men. The mean size of the pseudocyst was 9.56 ± 2.3 cm. Technical success was 100%, and clinical success was 92.3%. The stents were removed on average after 8 ± 2 weeks. The mean procedural time from puncture to stent deployment was 3.2 ± 2.4 minutes. In the imaging check-up, the collections had adequate drainage in all cases. There was a low frequency of complications; bleeding was documented in one case requiring surgery. Conclusions: LAMS is safe and effective in managing symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts, reducing hospital stay and cost overruns. Clinical symptomatology prevails in the surgery decision.
Introducción: el drenaje guiado por ultrasonido endoscópico (USE) y el uso de stent metálico luminal de aposición (LAMS) son de elección en el manejo de los pseudoquistes pancreáticos sintomáticos. Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad y seguridad del LAMS para el drenaje por USE de pseudoquistes pancreáticos sintomáticos en dos centros de referencia en Colombia. Materiales y métodos: estudio de cohorte prospectivo multicéntrico entre junio de 2019 y diciembre de 2021, se incluyeron a 13 pacientes con diagnóstico de pseudoquistes pancreáticos sintomáticos sometidos a drenaje por USE con LAMS. Se evaluaron como desenlaces el éxito técnico, el éxito clínico y la extracción exitosa del stent. Y los desenlaces de seguridad incluyeron eventos adversos relacionados con el stent y los eventos adversos generales. Se realizó seguimiento a 8 semanas, en las que se recopilaron datos relacionados con el retiro del stent. Resultados: la edad promedio fue 53,4 años, 8/13 fueron hombres. El tamaño medio del pseudoquiste fue de 9,56 ± 2,3 cm. El éxito técnico fue del 100% y el éxito clínico fue 92,3%. Los stents fueron retirados en promedio a las 8 ± 2 semanas. El tiempo medio del procedimiento desde la punción hasta el despliegue del stent fue 3,2 ± 2,4 minutos. En el control imagenológico hubo un adecuado drenaje de las colecciones en todos los casos. Hubo baja frecuencia de complicaciones, se documentó sangrado en 1 caso con requerimiento quirúrgico. Conclusiones: el uso de LAMS es seguro y efectivo en el manejo de pseudoquistes pancreáticos sintomáticos, disminuye la estancia hospitalaria y sobrecostos. La sintomatología clínica prima en la decisión de intervención.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Liquid-filled intragastric balloons (IGBs) have emerged as a safe and effective option for managing overweight and obesity. However, there is limited information available regarding the implementation of liquid IGBs in individuals with low- and moderate-risk obesity. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the implementation of liquid IGBs in low- and moderate-risk obese individuals in terms of weight loss, safety, and tolerance at four, six, and twelve months of treatment. Materials and methods: This prospective, descriptive observational study included 109 subjects with low- and moderate-risk obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 30-40 kg/m2), who underwent endoscopic implantation of liquid-filled IGBs. The variables analyzed included sex, age, initial and final weight, percentage of weight loss, and side effects. Results: Out of the 109 subjects, 75.22% were women. The average weight at baseline was 87.22 kg, with an average BMI of 31.59 kg/m2. Three different brands of IGBs were used: Orbera (n=103), Spatz3 (n=3), and Elipse (n=3). The average weight loss showed significant differences when analyzed by months and brands-Ellipse: four months (-4.6 kg), Spatz3: three months (-7 kg), Orbera: six months (15.2 kg), Orbera: twelve months (19.7 kg). The average reduction in BMI achieved was 27.71 kg/m2. The complication rate was 2.75%, with two cases (1.83%) attributed to intolerance (abdominal pain) and one case due to acute appendicitis (0.91%). Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that liquid-filled IGBs are a safe and effective procedure for managing low- and moderate-risk obesity. A minimum duration of twelve months with an IGB implantation is considered optimal for individuals with low- and moderate-risk obesity.
Introducción: los balones intragástricos (BIG) de llenado líquido han surgido como una opción segura y eficaz para el manejo de sobrepeso y obesidad. En nuestro medio hay poca información acerca de su implementación en obesidad de riesgo bajo y moderado. Objetivo: evaluar la implementación del BIG de contenido líquido en individuos con obesidad de riesgo bajo y moderado en términos de pérdida de peso, seguridad y tolerancia a 4, 6 y 12 meses de tratamiento. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional prospectivo y descriptivo, se incluyeron a 109 sujetos con obesidad de riesgo bajo y moderado (índice de masa corporal [IMC] de 30 a 40 kg/m2), a quienes se les implantó por vía endoscópica un BIG de llenado líquido. Se analizaron las variables de sexo, edad, peso inicial y final, porcentaje de pérdida de peso y efectos secundarios. Resultados: 109 sujetos, 75,22% correspondieron a mujeres, el peso promedio fue de 87,22 kg, con IMC promedio de 31,59 kg/m2. Se usaron tres marcas (Orbera, n: 103; Spatz, 3, n: 3; y Elipse, n: 3). La pérdida de peso promedio presentó diferencias importantes al analizar por meses y marcas: Elipse: 4 meses (-4,6 kg), Spatz 3: 3 meses (-7 kg), Orbera: 6 meses (15,2 kg), Orbera: 12 meses (19,7 kg). Se logró la reducción del IMC promedio a 27,71 kg/m2. La tasa de complicaciones fue del 2,75%, 2 (1,83%) por intolerancia (dolor abdominal) y una por apendicitis aguda (0,91%). Conclusiones: El BIG de llenado líquido es un procedimiento seguro y eficaz. Un período de implantación del BIG de al menos 12 meses se considera óptimo para obesidad de riesgo bajo y moderado.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has diverse gastrointestinal manifestations, often requiring endoscopy. Objective: The primary objective is to describe the need for endoscopic procedures from a sample of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The secondary objective is to describe the characteristics, findings, and interventions. Materials and methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2020 to December 2021 about indications, endoscopic findings, interventions, anesthesia requirements, and adverse events from a sample of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 in whom gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures were performed for any indication. Results: Of 2,312 hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, 2.72% required endoscopic procedures, with a predominance of men (75%), an average age of 65.7 years, and the majority for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (68%). The most frequent indications were gastrointestinal bleeding (62%) and enteral access (28.3%). An ischemic compromise was documented in three patients. Of those with digestive bleeding, 9.5% required hemostatic therapy, and 65% were on ventilatory support and sedation during the endoscopic procedure. In half of these cases, anesthesiology support was required without periprocedural adverse events, nor was a negative pressure room required in any procedure. Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 requiring gastrointestinal endoscopy, clinical judgment is necessary to define the relevance of the procedure; in many cases, conservative management may be considered.
Introducción: la infección por coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave de tipo 2 (SARS-CoV-2) tiene manifestaciones gastrointestinales diversas, que en muchas ocasiones requieren de endoscopia. Objetivo: como objetivo primario, describir la necesidad de procedimientos endoscópicos a partir de una muestra de pacientes hospitalizados con enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) moderado a grave, y como objetivo secundario, describir en detalle las características, los hallazgos y las intervenciones. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional descriptivo de corte trasversal desde mayo de 2020 a diciembre de 2021 acerca de las indicaciones, hallazgos endoscópicos, intervenciones, requerimiento de anestesia y eventos adversos a partir de una muestra de pacientes con COVID-19 moderado a grave en quienes se realizaron procedimientos endoscópicos gastrointestinales por cualquier indicación. Resultados: de 2312 pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 moderado a grave, 2,72% requirió procedimientos endoscópicos, con predominio de los hombres (75%), edad promedio de 65,7 años y la mayoría para endoscopia digestiva alta (68%). Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron hemorragia gastrointestinal (62%) y acceso enteral (28,3%). Se documentó compromiso isquémico en tres pacientes. En aquellos con sangrado digestivo, 9,5% requirió terapia hemostática, 65% se encontraba con soporte ventilatorio y sedación al momento del procedimiento endoscópico, y en la mitad de estos casos se requirió el apoyo de anestesiología, sin presentarse eventos adversos periprocedimentales, ni requerimiento de sala de presión negativa en ningún procedimiento. Conclusiones: en el paciente con COVID-19 moderado a grave con requerimiento de endoscopia gastrointestinal es necesario un juicio clínico para definir la pertinencia del procedimiento, y en muchos casos puede plantearse un manejo conservador.
RESUMEN
The presence of esophageal foreign body (EFB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. The protocol for management and endoscopic intervention can be variable among institutions. OBJECTIVE: to define the clinical characteristics of EFB in adults, its radiological and endoscopic diagnosis, and complications based on a sample of patients in a gastroenterology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: case series of patients admitted from the emergency department and referred to the gastroenterology department with a presumptive diagnosis of EFB. Clinical variables were collected, as well as characteristics, comorbidities, time of evolution and diagnostic opportunity, confirmatory studies, and complications. RESULTS: 84 subjects, 70% men, mean age 45 (range: 17-87; SD 12.5) years. Urgent upper endoscopy was performed in 98.8% of the patients, with an average in-hospital stay of 2.5 days. 93% had no associated underlying pathology, in 6/84 (7.14%) patients structural or functional esophageal pathology was documented. 59/84 (70.2%) patients consulted in the first 24 hours, in 57.6% the presence of foreign body was confirmed endoscopically. In 67/84 (79.76%) patients radiography was performed prior to endoscopy, of which 62/67 (92.5%) had an abnormal result. Seventy percent of confirmed EFB were fish bones. The most frequent site of localization was in the cricopharyngeal region in 90% of the cases. In 66/84 (78.6%) subjects there was absence of complications, followed by deep laceration in 10/84 (11.9%) cases. In 3/84 (3.6%) cases complications requiring surgery were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic intervention in the first 24 hours is an opportune moment to identify complications and provide the indicated treatment.
Asunto(s)
Esófago , Cuerpos Extraños , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Hospitalización , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
SpyGlass DS es un sistema de colangioscopia peroral, asociado a mejor calidad de imagen y conFiguración. Actualmente, existe diversidad en su uso y escasa información sobre su implementación, incluyendo resultados clínicos y eventos adversos. Describir la experiencia de uso del SpyGlass DS en varios centros de referencia en gastroenterología en Colombia, mencionando eficacia y posibles eventos adversos. Este es un estudio observacional (serie de casos). La principal indicación fue coledocolitiasis (n:204), seguida de estenosis biliar (n:40) y pancreatolitiasis (n:16). 49,2% fueron hombres, edad media de 58,6 años, clínicamente con predominio de dolor abdominal (80,5%) e ictericia (86,1%). Todos los casos presentaron diagnóstico por imagen previo (tomografía computarizada, resonancia magnética o ecografía), 98,07% colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica previa (n:255) y 75% stent plástico biliar. Se utilizó láser en 78/220 pacientes y litotricia electrohidráulica en 142/220 pacientes, con tasas de resolución en una sola sesión 96,15% y 95,07%, respectivamente. Siete casos requirieron segunda sesión de litotricia y 3 pacientes requirieron manejo quirúrgico, uno por pancreatolitiasis con páncreas divisum de base y 2 por hepatolitiasis. 40/260 pacientes presentaron estenosis biliar, 32/40 con hallazgos malignos (colangiocarcinoma) y 8/40 con patología benigna (colangitis esclerosante primaria, cambios inflamatorios inespecíficos) tras estudios histopatológicos. Como complicaciones, se registraron 6 casos de bacteriemia (2,5%), siendo más frecuentes en casos de estenosis. La estancia media postoperatoria fue 2,04 días. Concluimos que el uso del SpyGlass DS es factible en nuestro medio, siendo eficaz para diagnóstico y tratamiento de lesiones biliares, y con bajo riesgo de eventos adversos.
SpyGlass DS is a peroral cholangioscopy system, associated with improved image quality and conFiguration. Currently, there is diversity in its use and little information on its implementation, including clinical outcomes and adverse events. To describe the experience of using SpyGlass DS in several gastroenterology reference centres in Colombia, mentioning efficacy and possible adverse events. This is an observational study (case series). The main indication was choledocholithiasis (n:204), followed by biliary stricture (n:40) and pancreatolithiasis (n:16). 49.2% were male, mean age 58.6 years, clinically with predominance of abdominal pain (80.5%) and jaundice (86.1%). All cases had previous imaging (CT scan, MRI or ultrasound), 98.07% previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n:255) and 75% biliary plastic stent. Laser was used in 78/220 patients and electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 142/220 patients, with single-session resolution rates of 96.15% and 95.07%, respectively. Seven cases required a second lithotripsy session and 3 patients required surgical management, one for pancreatolithiasis with basal pancreas divisum and 2 for hepatolithiasis. 40/260 patients presented with biliary stricture, 32/40 with malignant findings (cholangiocarcinoma) and 8/40 with benign pathology (primary sclerosing cholangitis, non-specific inflammatory changes) after histopathological studies. As complications, 6 cases of bacteraemia (2.5%) were recorded, being more frequent in cases of stenosis. The mean postoperative stay was 2.04 days. We concluded that the use of SpyGlass DS is feasible in our setting, being effective for diagnosis and treatment of biliary lesions, and with low risk of adverse events.
RESUMEN
SpyGlass DS is a peroral cholangioscopy system, associated with improved image quality and configuration. Currently, there is diversity in its use and little information on its implementation, including clinical outcomes and adverse events. To describe the experience of using SpyGlass DS in several gastroenterology reference centres in Colombia, mentioning efficacy and possible adverse events. This is an observational study (case series). The main indication was choledocholithiasis (n:204), followed by biliary stricture (n:40) and pancreatolithiasis (n:16). 49.2% were male, mean age 58.6 years, clinically with predominance of abdominal pain (80.5%) and jaundice (86.1%). All cases had previous imaging (CT scan, MRI or ultrasound), 98.07% previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n:255) and 75% biliary plastic stent. Laser was used in 78/220 patients and electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 142/220 patients, with single-session resolution rates of 96.15% and 95.07%, respectively. Seven cases required a second lithotripsy session and 3 patients required surgical management, one for pancreatolithiasis with basal pancreas divisum and 2 for hepatolithiasis. 40/260 patients presented with biliary stricture, 32/40 with malignant findings (cholangiocarcinoma) and 8/40 with benign pathology (primary sclerosing cholangitis, non-specific inflammatory changes) after histopathological studies. As complications, 6 cases of bacteraemia (2.5%) were recorded, being more frequent in cases of stenosis. The mean postoperative stay was 2.04 days. We concluded that the use of SpyGlass DS is feasible in our setting, being effective for diagnosis and treatment of biliary lesions, and with low risk of adverse events.