RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Particularly in broach-only uncemented total hip arthroplasty, a narrow femoral canal presents a technical challenge. Traditionally such femurs have been considered to be Dorr A. To our knowledge, however, no study has reported on the relationship between isthmus width and the Dorr classification. METHODS: We reviewed 500 high-quality, hard copy radiographs. Dorr classification and isthmus canal width were measured using an electronic caliper by 5 independent observers with intraobserver and interobserver error calculated. For this study, we defined a narrow canal as being ≤10 mm at its narrowest point (isthmus). RESULTS: Eight percent (40) were Dorr A, 85% (424) Dorr B, and 7% (36) Dorr C. With respect to isthmus width for Dorr A, 63% (25) were ≤10 mm compared to just 13% (55) of Dorr B. However, overall because there were more Dorr B femurs, 69% of those with an isthmus of ≤10 mm were Dorr B. CONCLUSION: In this population, almost 70% of patients with an isthmus ≤10 mm were Dorr B, with only 30% being Dorr A. When using a broach-only technique, isthmus width should be routinely measured on the preoperative anteroposterior radiographs so as to alert the surgeon to potential problems.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Radiografía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIMS: The aim of this retrospective audit was to determine the route of referral or presentation of patients requiring revision following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 4802 patients were implanted with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A* cementless implant (Corail/Pinnacle) between 2005 and 2015; 80 patients with a mean age of 67.8 years (sd 10.8) underwent a subsequent revision. The primary outcome measure was route of referral for revision. RESULTS: Of the 80 revisions, 31 (38.8%) took place within the first year and 69 (86.3%) took place within six years. Only two of the 80 patients were picked up at a routine review clinic, one for infection and the other for liner dissociation. A total of 36 revised patients (45.0%) were reviewed following self-referral. Of the remaining 44 revised patients (55.0%), 15 (18.8%) were General Practitioner referrals, 13 (16.3%) were other hospital referrals, six (7.5%) were inpatients, six (7.5%) were Emergency Department referrals, and two (2.5%) were readmitted from their homes. No revisions were carried out on asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that if there is a robust system in place for self-referral, patients with an ODEP 10A* hip implant can, if asymptomatic, be safely discharged at the time of their first postoperative review. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:536-539.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Auditoría Clínica , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonism with (Pro(3))GIP improves glucose tolerance and ameliorates insulin resistance and abnormalities of islet structure/function in ob/ob mice. This study examined the ability of (Pro(3))GIP to counter the development of obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes in mice fed high-fat and cafeteria diets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Young Swiss TO mice on standard chow or high-fat, cafeteria or high-carbohydrate diets received daily injections of either saline or (Pro(3))GIP (25 nmol kg(-1)day(-1)) over 16 weeks. Food intake, body weight, and circulating glucose and insulin were measured frequently. At 16 weeks, glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, HbA(1c), circulating hormones and plasma lipids were assessed. Adipose tissue, liver and muscle were excised and weighed, and their histology and triacylglycerol content were further examined. RESULTS: (Pro(3))GIP significantly reduced body weight, enhanced locomotor activity, and improved HbA(1c), glucose tolerance, beta cell responsiveness and insulin sensitivity in mice fed high-fat and cafeteria diets (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). Similarly, (Pro(3))GIP significantly reduced plasma corticosterone and triacylglycerols (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001), while glucagon, resistin and adiponectin were unchanged. (Pro(3))GIP decreased adipose tissue mass (p < 0.01) and the triacylglycerol content of liver, muscle and adipose tissue (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001). Adipocyte size and liver morphology were partially normalised. (Pro(3))GIP did not significantly affect any of these parameters in mice fed a high-carbohydrate diet. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: (Pro(3))GIP protects against obesity, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and associated disturbances in mice fed high-fat and cafeteria diets. This highlights chemical GIP receptor antagonism as a new possibility for the treatment of obesity and associated metabolic disturbances.