RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Fever following immunizations is a common presenting chiefcomplaint among infants. The 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) febrile infant clinical practice guidelines exclude recently immunized (RI) infants. This is a challenge for clinicians in the management of the febrile RI young infant. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of SBI in RI febrile young infants between 6 and 12 weeks of age. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of infants 6-12 weeks who presented with a fever ≥38 °C to two U.S. military academic Emergency Departments over a four-year period. Infants were considered recently immunized (RI) if they had received immunizations in the preceding 72 h prior to evaluation and not recently immunized (NRI) if they had not received immunizations during this time period. The primary outcome was prevalence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) further delineated into invasive-bacterial infection (IBI) and non-invasive bacterial infection (non-IBI) based on culture and/or radiograph reports. RESULTS: Of the 508 febrile infants identified, 114 had received recent immunizations in the preceding 72 h. The overall prevalence of SBI was 11.4% (95% CI = 8.9-14.6) in our study population. The prevalence of SBI in NRI infants was 13.7% (95% CI = 10.6-17.6) compared to 3.5% (95% CI = 1.1-9.3) in RI infants. The relative risk of SBI in the setting of recent immunizations was 0.3 (95% CI = 0.1-0.7). There were no cases of invasive-bacterial infections (IBI) in the RI group with all but one of the SBI being urinary tract infections (UTI). The single non-UTI was a case of pneumonia in an infant who presented with respiratory symptoms within 24 h of immunizations. CONCLUSION: The risk of IBI (meningitis or bacteremia) in RI infants aged 6 to 12 weeks is low. Non-IBI within the first 24 h following immunization was significantly lower than in febrile NRI infants. UTIs remain a risk in the RI population and investigation with urinalysis and urine culture should be encouraged. Shared decision making with families guide a less invasive approach to the care of these children. Future research utilizing a large prospective multi-center data registry would aid in further defining the risk of both IBI and non-IBI among RI infants.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fiebre , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Fiebre/etiología , Fiebre/epidemiología , Femenino , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Inmunización , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Recent retrospective studies from Wuhan, China suggest Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be associated with a hypercoagulable state and increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The overlap in the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19 with concurrent pulmonary embolism creates a diagnostic challenge for emergency medicine physicians in patients already at risk for renal impairment. However, identifying features atypical for COVID-19 alone may play a role in the judicious use of Computed Tomography Angiography among these patients. Hemoptysis is seen in roughly 13% of pulmonary embolism cases and infrequently reported among COVID-19 infections. Additionally, the presence of right heart strain on electrocardiography (EKG) is a well described clinical presentations of pulmonary embolism not reported commonly with COVID-19 infections.