Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol ; 30(2): 135-143, 2023 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968968

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Newer navigational bronchoscopy technologies render peripheral lung lesions accessible for biopsy and potential treatment. We investigated whether photodynamic therapy (PDT) delivered via navigational bronchoscopy is feasible and safe for ablation of peripheral lung tumors. METHODS: Two studies evaluated PDT in patients with solid peripheral lung tumors followed by clinical follow-up (nonresection study, N=5) or lobectomy (resection study, N=10). Porfimer sodium injection was administered 40 to 50 hours before navigational bronchoscopy. Lesion location was confirmed by radial probe endobronchial ultrasonography. An optical fiber diffuser was placed within or adjacent to the tumor under fluoroscopic guidance; laser light (630 nm wavelength) was applied at 200 J/cm of diffuser length for 500 seconds. Tumor response was assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 3 and 6 months postprocedure (nonresection study) and pathologically (resection study). RESULTS: There were no deaths, discontinuations for adverse events, or serious or grade ≥3 adverse events related to study treatments. Photosensitivity reactions occurred in 8 of 15 patients: 6 mild, 1 moderate, 1 severe (elevated porphyrins noted in blood after treatment). Among 5 patients with clinical follow-up, 1 had complete response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease at 6 months follow-up. Among 10 patients who underwent lobectomy, 1 had no evidence of tumor at resection (complete response), 3 had 40% to 50% tumor cell necrosis, 2 had 20% to 35%, and 4 had 5% to 10%. CONCLUSION: PDT for nonthermal ablation of peripheral lung tumors was feasible and safe in this small study. Further study is warranted to evaluate efficacy and corroborate the safety profile.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Fotoquimioterapia , Humanos , Fotoquimioterapia/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Éter de Dihematoporfirina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Luz , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico
2.
Lung Cancer ; 147: 198-203, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary carcinoids, which are well-differentiated lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, account for only 1-2 % of primary lung malignancies. Although fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography performs poorly in the identification of mediastinal lymph node metastases, particularly for pulmonary carcinoids, endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) may be a useful means of preoperative nodal assessment in patients with these conditions. However, the diagnostic performance of EBUS TBNA is unknown. This study was designed to determine the sensitivity of EBUS for mediastinal staging in patients with typical carcinoid. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with carcinoids who underwent EBUS TBNA and/or surgical resection with lymphadenectomy at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was performed. The sensitivity of EBUS -TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases was determined. RESULTS: Of the 212 patients with pulmonary carcinoids we identified, 137 had surgery with no preoperative EBUS TBNA, 68 had EBUS TBNA followed by surgery, and 7 had EBUS TBNA only. The sensitivity rate for EBUS TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases was 77.78 % overall (95 % CI, 57.7-91.3%) and it was 87.5 % (95 % CI, 67.6-97.3%) when we considered only patients with EBUS TBNA-accessible lymph nodes. DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of EBUS TBNA for diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases of pulmonary carcinoids was slightly lower than that reported previously for non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative EBUS TBNA identified nodal metastases not previously identified by imaging.


Asunto(s)
Tumor Carcinoide , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Broncoscopía , Tumor Carcinoide/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Mediastino/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 201(2): 212-223, 2020 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31574238

RESUMEN

Rationale: When stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is an option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), distinguishing between N0, N1, and N2 or N3 (N2|3) disease is important.Objectives: To develop a prediction model for estimating the probability of N0, N1, and N2|3 disease.Methods: Consecutive patients with clinical-radiographic stage T1 to T3, N0 to N3, and M0 NSCLC who underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided staging from a single center were included. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to predict the presence of N0, N1, or N2|3 disease. Temporal validation used consecutive patients from 3 years later at the same center. External validation used three other hospitals.Measurements and Main Results: In the model development cohort (n = 633), younger age, central location, adenocarcinoma, and higher positron emission tomography-computed tomography nodal stage were associated with a higher probability of having advanced nodal disease. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.84 and 0.86 for predicting N1 or higher (vs. N0) disease and N2|3 (vs. N0 or N1) disease, respectively. Model fit was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.960; Brier score, 0.36). In the temporal validation cohort (n = 473), AUCs were 0.86 and 0.88. Model fit was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.172; Brier score, 0.30). In the external validation cohort (n = 722), AUCs were 0.86 and 0.88 but required calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P < 0.001; Brier score, 0.38). Calibration using the general calibration method resulted in acceptable model fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.094; Brier score, 0.34).Conclusions: This prediction model can estimate the probability of N0, N1, and N2|3 disease in patients with NSCLC. The model has the potential to facilitate decision-making in patients with NSCLC when stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is an option.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Reglas de Decisión Clínica , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiocirugia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA