Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 37(2): 83-90, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279227

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. RESULTS: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P=.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P=.001, P<.001, P<.001, and P=.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P=.002, P=.017, P=.013, and P=.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas , Adulto , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Neurología (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 37(2): 83-90, Mar. 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés, Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-204643

RESUMEN

Introducción: El síndrome de piernas inquietas (SPI) es un trastorno caracterizado por la necesidad imperiosa de mover las piernas, estando a menudo acompañado de sensaciones desagradables. Su frecuencia es superior en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple (EM) que en la población general. Objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia del SPI, según el cumplimiento de los 4 requisitos esenciales incluidos en los criterios diagnósticos propuestos por la International Restless leg syndrome study group (IRLSSG, 2003), en una cohorte de pacientes con EM e identificar posibles factores de riesgo y repercusión clínica. Resultados: Se incluyeron 120 pacientes con EM, con una edad media de inicio de 40 años y un tiempo medio de evolución de 46 meses. La prevalencia de SPI, según el cumplimiento de criterios diagnósticos de la IRLSSG, fue del 23,3%. El tiempo de evolución de EM, desde la aparición de los primeros síntomas, fue significativamente menor en pacientes con SPI (p=0,001). La presencia de un brote reciente, así como de síntomas de ansiedad, depresión y dolor neuropático se asociaron de forma significativa con el riesgo de SPI (p=0,001, p<0,001, p<0,001 y p=0,001, respectivamente). Además, los pacientes con SPI y EM presentaron mayor riesgo de mala calidad de sueño, fatiga, somnolencia diurna y peor calidad de vida, que aquellos sin SPI (p=0,002, p=0,017, p=0,013 y p=0,009, respectivamente). Conclusiones: El SPI debe ser considerado en la evaluación neurológica de pacientes con EM, cuyo diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz mejoraría la calidad de vida de estos sujetos. (AU)


Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. Results: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P = 0.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P = 0.002, P = 0.017, P = 0.013, and P = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adulto , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Depresión
3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 2019 Apr 05.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30962014

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. RESULTS: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P = 0.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P = 0.002, P = 0.017, P = 0.013, and P = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.

4.
Rev Neurol ; 53(3): 146-52, 2011 Aug 01.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21748712

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The existence of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP-4-ab) has identified neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS) as different diseases. Although HLA-DRB1 alleles contribute to MS risk, recent studies suggest that HLA back-ground differs between patients with NMO or MS in non-Caucasians populations. Our study was aimed to analyze HLA-DRB1 distribution in Caucasians NMO patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited a cohort of 22 NMO patients (73% were AQP-4-ab positive), 228 MS patients and 225 healthy controls from Spain and we genotyped the HLA-DRB1 locus. Then, we performed a pool analysis using reported data from 45 NMO patients (53% were AQP-4-ab positive), 156 MS patients and 310 healthy controls from Caucasian French population. RESULTS: In the Spanish cohort, NMO was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*10 allele compared with MS (odds ratio, OR = 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 3.26-69.84; p = 0.012). In the pooled analysis, by comparison with healthy controls, NMO was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*03 allele (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.44-3.58; p < 0.0008) which was related to AQP-4-ab seropositivity (OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.58-4.77; p < 0.0008). By contrast, MS was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*15 allele (OR = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.62-2.68; p < 0.0008) and decreased frequency of DRB1*07 allele (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.44-0.78; p < 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Caucasian patients with NMO and MS have a different HLA-DRB1 allelic distribution. DRB1*03 allele seems to contribute to NMO seropositivity. Multicenter collaborative efforts are needed to adequately address the genetic contribution to NMO susceptibility.


Asunto(s)
Alelos , Genotipo , Antígenos HLA-DR/genética , Neuromielitis Óptica/genética , Neuromielitis Óptica/inmunología , Población Blanca/genética , Acuaporina 4/genética , Acuaporina 4/inmunología , Estudios de Cohortes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Antígenos HLA-DR/inmunología , Cadenas HLA-DRB1 , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/genética , Esclerosis Múltiple/inmunología , España
5.
Rev Neurol ; 40(12): 743-50, 2005.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15973642

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Epilepsia/terapia , Neurología/métodos , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , España , Nervio Vago/fisiología
6.
Rev Neurol ; 40(10): 619-25, 2005.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15926137

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías como Asunto , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Lactante , España
7.
Rev Neurol ; 40(11): 683-95, 2005.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15948072

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/etiología , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Encefalopatías/complicaciones , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/farmacocinética , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacocinética , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/metabolismo , Hepatopatías/complicaciones , Masculino , Porfirias/complicaciones , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Enfermedades Respiratorias/complicaciones , Convulsiones Febriles/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 40(12): 743-750, 16 jun., 2005. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-128861

RESUMEN

Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care (AU)


Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes, de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon y clasificaron según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Lóbulo Temporal , Epilepsia/cirugía , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Dieta Cetogénica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estimulación del Nervio Vago
9.
Rev Neurol ; 40(9): 563-71, 2005.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15898019

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , España
10.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 40(9): 563-571, 1 mayo, 2005. tab
Artículo en Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-037083

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon y clasificaron según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales


Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health careAims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Esquema de Medicación , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas , Factores de Riesgo , Recurrencia/prevención & control
11.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 40(10): 619-626, 16 mayo, 2005. tab
Artículo en Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-037095

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes, de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon clasificándolas según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales


Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health careAims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care


Asunto(s)
Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquema de Medicación , Epilepsia/clasificación
12.
Rev Neurol ; 30(12): 1154-6, 2000.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10935242

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The neurological features of chronic renal failure are very varied. Uremic myopathy is a controversial condition. In most cases it is related to the secondary hyperparathyroidism which these patients develop, and its characteristics are superimposed on their osteomalacia myopathy. CLINICAL CASES AND CONCLUSIONS: We report two patients with terminal chronic renal failure on hemodialysis who complained on difficulty with walking. The clinical findings, laboratory and neurophysiological investigations and the histopathological report of the muscle biopsy were similar to those of osteomalacia myopathy. The muscle weakness of patients with terminal chronic renal failure is related to many factors. The most important of these is the secondary hyperparathyroidism which leads to osteomalacia myopathy. On muscle biopsy there was isolated fibre necrosis of both types 1 and 2 (case 1) and of type 2 alone (case 2), which is considered to be the commonest finding. Although treatment with high doses of vitamin D3, or its hydroxylated metabolites, has been recommended, it was not effective in our patients.


Asunto(s)
Miopatías Mitocondriales/complicaciones , Uremia/complicaciones , Anciano , Biopsia , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Miopatías Mitocondriales/diagnóstico , Miopatías Mitocondriales/etiología , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Necrosis , Osteomalacia/complicaciones , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Uremia/etiología
13.
Rev Neurol ; 28(11): 1072-4, 1999.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10390779

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The etiology of lumbosacral plexopathy is often due to compression. One of the less common causes of this is aneurysm of the iliac artery. However, 13% of the patients with this disorder initially have symptoms of plexus irritation or deficit. CLINICAL CASE: We describe the case of a 42 year-old-man, with no previous medical history, who complained of right-sided sciatica for the previous three months. On examination there were clinical signs of a lesion of the right lumbosacral plexus. On CT of the pelvis and MR of the lumbar spine there were images compatible with an aneurysm of the right iliac artery. This diagnosis was confirmed on arteriography. Treatment was surgical (aneurysmography and right iliofemoral by-pass). The pain disappeared and the motor deficit improved considerably. CONCLUSION: When a patient presents with lumbosacral plexopathy, an iliac aneurysm should be considered as a possible etiological factor. In such cases early diagnosis is essential, since surgical treatment will usually resolve the clinical problem.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Ilíaco/complicaciones , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico , Plexo Lumbosacro/diagnóstico por imagen , Plexo Lumbosacro/patología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/etiología , Adulto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Angiografía , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino
18.
Neurologia ; 13(3): 145-7, 1998 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9608222

RESUMEN

The Pourfour du Petit's syndrome is characterized by the unilateral appearance of mydriasis, lid retraction and exophthalmos. It suggests the existence of a localized oculosympathetic hyperactivity. It tends be to caused by injuries that suppose a stimulus of the sympathetics fibers at level of the proximal portion of the first dorsal root or in the cervical sympathetic chain. We report the clinical case of a young patient who developed a Pourfour du Petit's syndrome secondary to a small condrosarcoma of the proximal portion of the first rib. The observation of this syndrome is exceptional but its knowledge permits, by the great topographic value that possesses, a rapid identification of the causative injury.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Condrosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Exoftalmia/complicaciones , Enfermedades de los Párpados/complicaciones , Músculos Intercostales/diagnóstico por imagen , Midriasis/complicaciones , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
20.
Rev Neurol ; 24(136): 1538-40, 1996 Dec.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9064171

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The clinical findings of basilar dolichoectasia (DB) are caused by compression of the cranial nerves, vertebrobasilar ischaemia, hydrocephaly and compression of the brainstem. Hypoacusia as an isolated finding in DB is very rare. CLINICAL CASE: We describe the case of a 48-year-old hypertensive man with bilateral hypoacusia as an isolated finding in DB. Diagnosis was made on MR, and arteriography showed changes characteristic of an anomalous blood vessel. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypoacusia of uncertain aetiology, specially if they are also hypertensive, one should rule out the possibility of DB using cerebral magnetic resonance or angioresonance.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Basilar/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/fisiopatología , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Angiografía Cerebral , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA