RESUMEN

INTRODUÇÃO: O treinamento muscular inspiratório (TMI) no pré-operatório pode evitar complicações pulmonares no pós-operatório (CPPO) em pacientes submetidos a esofagectomia. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia do TMI que foi realizado no período pré-operatório e seus benefícios no período pós-operatório, através da avaliação da pressão inspiratória máxima (PImáx), da pressão expiratória máxima (PEmáx), da ventilação voluntária máxima (VVM) e do pico de fluxo expiratório (PFE) e os benefícios do mesmo no pós-operatório. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um ensaio clínico, randomizado, que foi realizado pela disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Foram incluídos 26 pacientes em: Grupo Controle (GC: n=12) e Grupo Intervenção (GI: n=14). O GI realizou TMI por no mínimo 2 semanas. As avaliações foram realizadas no pré e pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: Houve aumento da PImáx (p=0,006), da PEmáx (p=0,005) e do VVM (0,042) no GI, após o TMI realizado no pré-operatório em relação ao GC. Na avaliação do PFE não foi observada aumento após o TMI no GI em relação ao GC (p=0,63). Na alta hospitalar houve queda das variáveis avaliadas em ambos os grupos e no 30°PO ocorreu recuperação em relação aos valores iniciais. Quanto a ocorrência de CPPO não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: O TMI realizado em nosso estudo melhorou a força muscular inspiratória, expiratória e a função ventilatória no préoperatório, porém não resultou em melhor evolução no pós-operatório de pacientes submetidos a esofagectomia.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative IMT and its postoperative benefits by assessing maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted by the Digestive Tract Surgery Service, University Hospital of the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro. Twenty-six patients were included: control group (CG, n=12) and intervention group (IG, n=14). Patients of IG underwent IMT for at least 2 weeks. Assessments were performed before and after surgery. RESULTS: There was an increase of MIP (p=0.006), MEP (p=0.005) and MVV (0.042) in IG after preoperative IMT compared to CG. Evaluation of PEF revealed no increase in IG after IMT compared to CG (p=0.63). A decrease in the variables analyzed was observed in both group at discharge and the variables had returned to baseline values on postoperative day 30. There was no significant difference in the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications between groups. CONCLUSION: The IMT applied in our study improved preoperative inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength and ventilatory function but did not result in better postoperative evolution of patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carboxytherapy (CA) refers to the cutaneous and subcutaneous administration of CO(2) for therapeutic purposes. Radiofrequency (RF) is a method that uses electric current for heating layers of the skin. Both techniques are indicated for the treatment of skin laxity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CA and RF on human skin. METHODS: After eight patients underwent abdominoplasty, each of them received a single treatment of CA and a single treatment of RF on the right and left infra-umbilical regions, respectively. In the infra-umbilical region, CA was performed on the right and RF was performed on the left side. Untreated skin was used as a control. The sample collection period lasted 120 days. CA was administered at a velocity of 40 mL/min, and the total quantity of CO(2) infused was approximately 20 mL. RF was carried out at a temperature higher than 40°C on the epidermis for 5 min. RESULTS: CA and RF led to collagen remodeling; however, this result was more evident and lasted longer with RF. With CA an increase in elastic fibers was observed, whereas with RF no alteration was observed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that RF is more efficient than CA in stimulating collagen synthesis.

Asunto(s)