RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To synthesize qualitative study findings on the meaning ascribed to wheelchairs and wheeled mobility devices (WMD) by WMD users. METHOD: Bibliographic databases were systematically searched up to January 2015 to identify relevant papers. Reviewers selected studies, assessed methodological quality and thematically synthesized findings using a metasynthesis process described by Thomas and Harden (2008). RESULTS: Twenty articles were included. Four descriptive themes emerged: physical environment interaction; sociocultural experiences; participation in activities and occupations; and WMD-self relationship. WMD use was found to be a complex experience that can fluctuate through interaction with aspects of the environment and opportunities for participation. The analytic theme, dynamic duality of WMD experience, addressed the simultaneous enabling and disabling aspects of WMD use. CONCLUSIONS: Metasyntheses enable researchers to gain a deeper understanding of issues by examining findings across studies. Findings of this study provide a framework for understanding the complexity of WMD use. The framework has practical applications for clinicians and users of WMD in understanding the experience of WMD to be neither singular nor static. Implications for Rehabilitation The meaning of wheeled mobility device (WMD) use is dynamically influenced by the environment and opportunities afforded for occupational and social participation. A duality of experiences can emerge for WMD users, where wheeled mobility use can be at the same time positive and negative, based on the interaction with the environment. Clinicians need to determine the meaning that each individual user ascribes to the WMD, and to consider how that meaning may change over time. By understanding the meaning ascribed to WMD use by individuals, clinicians can be better prepared to work with the WMD users to address negative reinforcers of the experience in physical and sociocultural environments as well as highlighting the positive experiences.