Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 140(3): 425-9, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26825616

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To draw a reliable picture of the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) within the MITO Group, trying to correlate the disease extent at presentation, the category of center, and surgical outcome. METHODS: Three tertiary referral centers for gynecologic oncology and four non-oncologic referral gynecologic surgical centers, participated in the project. A questionnaire was adopted to register perioperative data on AOCs (FIGO Stage IIICIV) consecutively operated on for a period of 12months. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients were registered into the study: 140 and 65 were recruited in oncological referral centers and non-referral centers, respectively. Following a multivariate analysis, the Eisenkop score and the category of center resulted the most potent predictors of complete surgical cytoreduction followed by PCI, preoperative CA125, and ASA score. Complete surgical cytoreduction was associated with oncological referral centers (60% vs 24.6%, p<0.001). The proportion of patients undergoing additional surgical procedures was significantly different comparing the two categories of centers (at least one additional procedure was performed in 81.4% vs 50.8% in oncological referral centers compared to the others, p<0.001). Despite the more aggressive surgery performed in oncological referral centers, the perioperative outcome measures were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The chance of obtaining a complete cytoreduction mainly depends on patient characteristics, tumor spread, and quality of treatment. The latter is amenable for direct influence, and therefore, seems to be of utmost importance when considering efforts aiming at improvement in the outcome of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/normas , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Breastfeed Med ; 10(9): 425-32, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26352805

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent results indicate that human mastitis and painful breastfeeding may be characterized by a mammary bacterial dysbiosis, a process in which the population of potential pathogens increases at the expense of the normal mammary microbiota. The objective of the present study is the evaluation of three different doses of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 to reduce the load of Staphylococcus in the breastmilk of women suffering from painful breastfeeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded controlled study with four study groups was performed. Three groups received the probiotic strain for 3 weeks at doses of 3×10(9) colony-forming units (CFU)/day, 6×10(9) CFU/day, or 9×10(9) CFU/day. The fourth group received a placebo of maltodextrin. The main outcome of the study was Staphylococcus counts in breastmilk. The secondary outcomes were Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and total bacteria counts in breastmilk, immunoglobulin A and interleukin 8 concentrations in breastmilk, and breast pain scores. RESULTS: At the end of the study, a significant decrease in the Staphylococcus load was observed in the probiotic groups compared with the baseline loads (p=0.045), whereas the control group maintained similar levels over time. A significant difference in the pain score was observed among the groups receiving the three probiotic doses compared with the control group (p=0.035, p=0.000, and p=0.028, respectively). A dose-response effect could not be observed because the three doses tested induced similar effects, and no significant differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that L. fermentum CECT5716 is an efficient treatment for breast pain during lactation associated with a high level of Staphylococcus in breastmilk.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Limosilactobacillus fermentum , Mastitis/microbiología , Leche Humana/microbiología , Probióticos , Adulto , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Lactancia , Mastitis/complicaciones , Mastitis/dietoterapia , Madres , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA