RESUMEN
Orofacial clefts (OFC) remain among the most prevalent congenital abnormalities worldwide. In the United States in 2010 to 2014, 16.2 of 10,000 live births are born with OFC compared with 23.6 of 10,000 in Alta Verapaz, Guatemala in 2012. Demographics and cleft severity scores were retrospectively gathered from 514 patients with isolated OFC at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia scheduled for surgery from 2012 to 2019 and from 115 patients seen during surgical mission trips to Guatemala City from 2017 to 2020. Risk factors were also gathered prospectively from Guatemalan families. The Guatemalan cohort had a significantly lower prevalence of cleft palate only compared with the US cohort, which may be a result of greater cleft severity in the population or poor screening and subsequent increased mortality of untreated cleft palate. Of those with lip involvement, Guatemalan patients were significantly more likely to have complete cleft lip, associated cleft palate, and right-sided and bilateral clefts, demonstrating an increased severity of Guatemalan cleft phenotype. Primary palate and lip repair for the Guatemalan cohort occurred at a significantly older age than that of the US cohort, placing Guatemalan patients at increased risk for long-term complications such as communication difficulties. Potential OFC risk factors identified in the Guatemalan cohort included maternal cooking-fire and agricultural chemical exposure, poor prenatal vitamin intake, poverty, and risk factors related to primarily corn-based diets. OFC patients who primarily rely on surgical missions for cleft care would likely benefit from more comprehensive screening and investigation into risk factors for more severe OFC phenotypes.
Asunto(s)
Recursos Audiovisuales , Cuidadores/educación , Pueblos Indígenas/educación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/educación , Adulto , Niño , Comunicación , Competencia Cultural , Guatemala , Humanos , Lenguaje , Misiones Médicas , Procedimientos de Cirugía PlásticaRESUMEN
Facial rejuvenation is a rapidly advancing field in aesthetic medicine. Minimally invasive techniques represent a powerful tool for rejuvenation, and fillers are a popular modality with which to restore and optimize facial proportions. Currently, our filler armamentarium is characterized by products with an increasing variety of biochemical compositions warranting tailored injection approaches. An intimate knowledge of anatomy, product characteristics, and appropriate injection techniques is essential to achieve optimal results while maintaining patient safety. Here, we review facial anatomy, structural changes secondary to aging, appropriate filler selection, safe injection techniques, and complications.
RESUMEN
Incisional hernias, especially those below the arcuate line, pose a unique challenge to reconstructive surgeons, as no consensus exists for repair strategy. An innovative approach is presented and illustrated. The "corset repair" involves placing an onlay mesh partially beneath released bilateral external obliques. A detailed technical review is provided to illustrate the benefits of this technique particularly in large defects and in hernia after abdominal flap harvest. Hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrence rates were reviewed and analyzed for a cohort of corset repair patients between December 2016 and January 2020. Twenty patients were included. All defects were successfully closed. Zero patients experienced hernia recurrence. Eight patients (40%) had a surgical site occurrence, of which 5 (63%) were either observed or managed non-operatively. Two of the surgical site occurrences were deep surgical site infections: 1 required surgical intervention for suspected mesh infection and the other did not. One patient (5%) developed hematoma 23 months post-operatively. The "corset repair" technique represents a modification to a classic technique for hernia repair. It is feasible and may be advantageous especially for large or challenging repairs below the arcuate line. It has promising results on early follow-up, and further research is needed to evaluate long-term efficacy.