Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 463, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39088058

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: High-pressure balloon dilatation (HPBD) of the ureterovesical junction with double-J stenting is a minimally invasive alternative to ureteral reimplantation or cutaneous ureterostomy for first-line surgical treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM). The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors associated with the need for secondary procedures due to HPBD failure. METHODS: Prospective data were collected from patients who underwent HPBD for POM between 2007 and 2021 at a single institution. The collected data included patient demographics, diagnostic modalities, surgical details, results, and follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-five ureters underwent HPBD for POM in 50 children, with a median age of 6.4 months (IQR: 4.5-13.8). Nineteen patients (37.25%) underwent secondary ureteric reimplantation, with a median of 9.8 months after primary HBPD (95% CI 6.2-9.9). The median follow-up was 29.4 months (IQR: 17.4-71). Independent risk factors for redo-surgery in a multivariate logistic regression model were: progressive ureterohydronephrosis (OR = 7.8; 95% CI 0.77-78.6) and early removal of the double-J stent. A risk reduction of 7% (95% CI 2.2%-11.4%) was observed per extra-day of catheter maintenance. The optimal cut-off point is 55 days, ROC curve area: 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.92). Gender, distal ureteral diameter, pelvis diameter, dilatation balloon diameter and preoperative differential renal function did not affect the need for reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a double-J stent for at least 55 days seems to avoid the need for a secondary procedure. Therefore, we recommend removing the double-J catheter at least 2 months after the HBPD.


Asunto(s)
Dilatación , Reoperación , Obstrucción Ureteral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Obstrucción Ureteral/etiología , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Lactante , Dilatación/métodos , Factores Protectores , Estudios Prospectivos , Uréter/cirugía , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Stents , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 20(1): 134-137, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827922

RESUMEN

Idiopathic urethritis (IU) is difficult to manage and there is no standarized therapy. The technique of local steroid injection (LSI) for the treatment of IU in children and the results of the patients undergoing LSI from 2020 to 2021 in a single center are presented. Seven patients with IU underwent LSI. An internal urethrotomy was also performed in two patients with stricture. Complete resolution of symptoms and signs occurred in six patients. The remaining patient did not achieve total remission but did substantially improve symptoms. LSI seems to be an effective alternative for treatment of IU in children.


Asunto(s)
Uretritis , Niño , Humanos , Uretritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Uretritis/diagnóstico , Uretra , Terapia Conductista , Recurrencia , Esteroides
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA