Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 81: 110906, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35716634

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative morphine requirement in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery was reduced by opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), as compared to an anesthetic strategy using opioids (opioid balanced anesthesia (OBA)) and to investigate the differences that may exist between the use of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in the context of OFA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center in Lyon, France. PATIENTS: 257 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery between March 2017 and March 2019. 77 patients were included in the OBA group and 180 in the OFA group. The OFA group was subdivided in two: 90 patients received OFA with clonidine (OFAC) and 90 received OFA with dexmedetomidine (OFAD). MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients who did not receive morphine during the first 24 postoperative hours. MAIN RESULTS: During the first 24 postoperative hours, the proportion of patients who did not require morphine was significantly higher in the OFA (87%) than in the OBA (52%) group (OR: 6.31; 95% CI [3.38; 11.80], P < 0.001). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, sex, type and duration of surgery (OR: 7.99; 95% CI [4.05; 16.48], P < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients in the OFAD (93%) than in the OFAC group (81%, P = 0.026) did not receive morphine during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: OFA is associated with a lower morphine requirement than with OBA during the first 24 h after bariatric surgery. In addition, OFAD seems to be more effective than OFAC in order to reduce morphine consumption.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Cirugía Bariátrica , Dexmedetomidina , Analgésicos Opioides , Clonidina , Humanos , Morfina , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Anesth Analg ; 130(1): e5-e8, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399021

RESUMEN

Lidocaine has been shown to be clinically beneficial during bariatric surgery. However, information about lidocaine serum concentrations in this setting is scarce. This prospective clinical trial included 42 obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. They received lidocaine based on adjusted body weight. Administration began with a 1.5 mg·kg bolus of intravenous lidocaine followed by a continuous infusion of 2 mg·kg·hour. After skin closure, administration was decreased to 1 mg·kg·hour until discharge from the recovery room. No serum concentrations of lidocaine were outside the usual accepted range (1.5-5 µg·mL).


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/sangre , Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Lidocaína/sangre , Obesidad/cirugía , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Esquema de Medicación , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/sangre , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA