RESUMEN
Purpose: To investigate tibial tunnel widening and knee instability after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft or irradiated soft tissue allograft. Methods: Eight-two patients were divided into two groups: autograft group and allograft group. Radiographic and clinical evaluations were performed. Results: Seventy patients were followed up with median of 36.3 months (range 36-38 months). Tibial tunnel widening was at or greater than 30% for nine patients in the autograft group and 15 patients in the allograft group (P = 0.0417). The average percentage of tibial tunnel widening was 26.7 ± 4.0 % and 29.7 ± 5.3 % in autograft and allograft groups, respectively (P = 0.0090). Knee range of motion was not affected by the reconstruction operation or different grafts. Thigh atrophy improved significantly within 24 months after ACL reconstructions in both groups. ACL reconstruction with the allograft leaded to less knee stability than that with the autograft from one year after operation (P = 0.0023). There was no significant difference between two groups with respect to Lysholm score (P = 0.1925) and Tegner score (P = 0.0918) at the final follow-up. Conclusion: The allograft group reported significantly more tibial tunnel widening and knee instability compared with the autograft group.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adulto , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/terapia , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Abstract Purpose: To investigate tibial tunnel widening and knee instability after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft or irradiated soft tissue allograft. Methods: Eight-two patients were divided into two groups: autograft group and allograft group. Radiographic and clinical evaluations were performed. Results: Seventy patients were followed up with median of 36.3 months (range 36-38 months). Tibial tunnel widening was at or greater than 30% for nine patients in the autograft group and 15 patients in the allograft group (P = 0.0417). The average percentage of tibial tunnel widening was 26.7 ± 4.0 % and 29.7 ± 5.3 % in autograft and allograft groups, respectively (P = 0.0090). Knee range of motion was not affected by the reconstruction operation or different grafts. Thigh atrophy improved significantly within 24 months after ACL reconstructions in both groups. ACL reconstruction with the allograft leaded to less knee stability than that with the autograft from one year after operation (P = 0.0023). There was no significant difference between two groups with respect to Lysholm score (P = 0.1925) and Tegner score (P =0 .0918) at the final follow-up. Conclusion: The allograft group reported significantly more tibial tunnel widening and knee instability compared with the autograft group.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Tibia/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Muslo/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Periodo Preoperatorio , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efectos adversos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Tempo Operativo , Aloinjertos/trasplante , Autoinjertos/trasplante , Tendones Isquiotibiales/trasplanteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate tibial tunnel widening and knee instability after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft or irradiated soft tissue allograft. METHODS: Eight-two patients were divided into two groups: autograft group and allograft group. Radiographic and clinical evaluations were performed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were followed up with median of 36.3 months (range 36-38 months). Tibial tunnel widening was at or greater than 30% for nine patients in the autograft group and 15 patients in the allograft group (P = 0.0417). The average percentage of tibial tunnel widening was 26.7 ± 4.0 % and 29.7 ± 5.3 % in autograft and allograft groups, respectively (P = 0.0090). Knee range of motion was not affected by the reconstruction operation or different grafts. Thigh atrophy improved significantly within 24 months after ACL reconstructions in both groups. ACL reconstruction with the allograft leaded to less knee stability than that with the autograft from one year after operation (P = 0.0023). There was no significant difference between two groups with respect to Lysholm score (P = 0.1925) and Tegner score (P =0 .0918) at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The allograft group reported significantly more tibial tunnel widening and knee instability compared with the autograft group.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Aloinjertos/trasplante , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/efectos adversos , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Autoinjertos/trasplante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tendones Isquiotibiales/trasplante , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Osteotomía/métodos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Muslo/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare therapeutic effect of femoral tunnel preparation through the tibial tunnel and the anteromedial (AM) portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2010, 76 patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction by autogenous grafting of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. All cases were randomly divided into two groups according to the method of femoral tunnel preparation: transtibial (TT) group (n=38) and anteromedial (AM) group (n=38). Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity at 30° of pre-and post-operation were assessed for two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (TT group, 34; AM group, 31) were followed up for more than 12 months, with a follow-up rate of 86%. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity 12 months after operation were significantly better than before reconstruction. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity were not significantly different between the TT and AM groups after operation. CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnel preparation through tibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction shows same therapeutic effects.
Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Plastía con Hueso-Tendón Rotuliano-Hueso/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Tendones/trasplante , Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare therapeutic effect of femoral tunnel preparation through the tibial tunnel and the anteromedial (AM) portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2010, 76 patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction by autogenous grafting of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. All cases were randomly divided into two groups according to the method of femoral tunnel preparation: transtibial (TT) group (n=38) and anteromedial (AM) group (n=38). Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity at 30° of pre-and post-operation were assessed for two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (TT group, 34; AM group, 31) were followed up for more than 12 months, with a follow-up rate of 86%. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity 12 months after operation were significantly better than before reconstruction. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity were not significantly different between the TT and AM groups after operation. CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnel preparation through tibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction shows same therapeutic effects.
OBJETIVO: Comparar prospectivamente o efeito terapêutico da preparação do túnel femoral através do túnel tibial (TT) ou da porta ântero-medial(AM) na reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior(LCA) em feixe único. MÉTODOS: Entre junho de 2008 e outubro de 2010, 76 pacientes foram submetidos à reconstrução do LCA em feixe único pelo enxerto autógeno de tendão semitendíneo egrácil.Todos os casos foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos de acordo como método de preparação do túnel femoral: grupo transtibial (TT) (n=38) e grupo ântero-medial (AM) (n=38). Foi usado o escore Lysholm para joelho. O relaxamento anterior do joelho a 30° sob força tênsil de 133,32N foi determinado com o medidor KT-1000 no pré e no pós-operatório nos dois grupos. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e cinco pacientes (grupo TT, 34; grupo AM,31)foram acompanhados por mais de 12 meses, com uma taxa de follow-up de 86%.A pontuação do Lysholm para joelho e do relaxamento anterior medido pelo KT-1000 aos 12 meses de pós-operatório foi significativamente melhor do que antes da reconstrução.As pontuações de Lysholme do relaxamento KT-1000 não foram significativamente diferentes comparando os grupos TT e AM após a operação. CONCLUSÃO: A preparação do túnel femoral através do túnel tibial ou da porta ântero-medial na reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior em feixe único mostrou os mesmos efeitos terapêuticos.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Plastía con Hueso-Tendón Rotuliano-Hueso/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Tendones/trasplante , Tibia/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/rehabilitación , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare therapeutic effect of femoral tunnel preparation through the tibial tunnel and the anteromedial (AM) portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2010, 76 patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction by autogenous grafting of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. All cases were randomly divided into two groups according to the method of femoral tunnel preparation: transtibial (TT) group (n=38) and anteromedial (AM) group (n=38). Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity at 30° of pre-and post-operation were assessed for two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (TT group, 34; AM group, 31) were followed up for more than 12 months, with a follow-up rate of 86%. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity 12 months after operation were significantly better than before reconstruction. The Lysholm knee score and the KT-1000 anterior laxity were not significantly different between the TT and AM groups after operation. CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnel preparation through tibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction shows same therapeutic effects.(AU)
OBJETIVO: Comparar prospectivamente o efeito terapêutico da preparação do túnel femoral através do túnel tibial (TT) ou da porta ântero-medial(AM) na reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior(LCA) em feixe único. MÉTODOS: Entre junho de 2008 e outubro de 2010, 76 pacientes foram submetidos à reconstrução do LCA em feixe único pelo enxerto autógeno de tendão semitendíneo egrácil.Todos os casos foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos de acordo como método de preparação do túnel femoral: grupo transtibial (TT) (n=38) e grupo ântero-medial (AM) (n=38). Foi usado o escore Lysholm para joelho. O relaxamento anterior do joelho a 30° sob força tênsil de 133,32N foi determinado com o medidor KT-1000 no pré e no pós-operatório nos dois grupos. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e cinco pacientes (grupo TT, 34; grupo AM,31)foram acompanhados por mais de 12 meses, com uma taxa de follow-up de 86%.A pontuação do Lysholm para joelho e do relaxamento anterior medido pelo KT-1000 aos 12 meses de pós-operatório foi significativamente melhor do que antes da reconstrução.As pontuações de Lysholme do relaxamento KT-1000 não foram significativamente diferentes comparando os grupos TT e AM após a operação. CONCLUSÃO: A preparação do túnel femoral através do túnel tibial ou da porta ântero-medial na reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior em feixe único mostrou os mesmos efeitos terapêuticos.(AU)