RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of two different techniques for blocking chest nerves during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) under spontaneous-ventilating anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred patients were recruited in this study and divided into two groups. The first, P group, underwent the TPVB approach; the second, I group, underwent the ICNB approach. Then, the rate of clinical efficacy, duration of the block procedure, and its complications were recorded for comparison of the effect of the two approaches. RESULTS: No difference was found in the clinical effect of chest nerve blocks between the two groups. Two patients in the ICNB group were converted to general anesthesia due to severe mediastinal flutter (grade three). The number of patients who had grade one mediastinal flutter in the TPVB group was significantly higher than in the ICNB group. Vascular puncture was detected in four patients in the ICNB group and in one patient in the TPVB group. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found regarding the clinical efficacy in the two groups. However, ultrasound-guided TPVB was superior to ultrasound-guided ICBN during VATS for pulmonary lobectomy under spontaneous-ventilating anesthesia. Additionally, vascular puncture should receive more attention.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Nervios Intercostales , Dolor PostoperatorioRESUMEN
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of two different techniques for blocking chest nerves during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) under spontaneous-ventilating anesthesia. METHODS One hundred patients were recruited in this study and divided into two groups. The first, P group, underwent the TPVB approach; the second, I group, underwent the ICNB approach. Then, the rate of clinical efficacy, duration of the block procedure, and its complications were recorded for comparison of the effect of the two approaches. RESULTS No difference was found in the clinical effect of chest nerve blocks between the two groups. Two patients in the ICNB group were converted to general anesthesia due to severe mediastinal flutter (grade three). The number of patients who had grade one mediastinal flutter in the TPVB group was significantly higher than in the ICNB group. Vascular puncture was detected in four patients in the ICNB group and in one patient in the TPVB group. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS No difference was found regarding the clinical efficacy in the two groups. However, ultrasound-guided TPVB was superior to ultrasound-guided ICBN during VATS for pulmonary lobectomy under spontaneous-ventilating anesthesia. Additionally, vascular puncture should receive more attention.
RESUMO OBJETIVO O objetivo do presente estudo é comparar a eficácia de duas técnicas diferentes para o bloqueio nervoso torácico durante cirurgia torácica vídeo-assistida (CTVA) e anestesia com ventilação espontânea. METODOLOGIA Cem pacientes foram incluídos no estudo e divididos em dois grupos. Em um (grupo P), foi utilizada a abordagem de BPVT e no outro (grupo I), a abordagem de BIC. Então, a taxa de eficácia clínica, duração do procedimento de bloqueio e suas complicações foram registradas para a comparação do efeito das duas abordagens. RESULTADOS Nenhuma diferença foi observada no efeito clínico do bloqueio nervoso torácico entre os dois grupos. Dois pacientes no grupo de BIC foram convertidos para anestesia geral devido a fibrilação mediastinal grave (grau três). O número de pacientes com fibrilação mediastinal de grau um no grupo de BPVT foi significativamente maior do que no grupo de BIC. Perfuração vascular foi detectada em quatro pacientes do grupo de BIC e em um do grupo de BPVT. Não foram observadas outras complicações. CONCLUSÃO Não houve diferença de eficácia clínica entre os dois grupos. No entanto, BPVT guiado por ultrassom foi superior ao BIC guiado por ultrassom durante CTVA para lobectomia pulmonar com anestesia em ventilação espontânea. Além disso, deve-se prestar mais atenção quanto à perfuração vascular.