Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJU Int ; 102(11): 1531-8, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19035858

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (blocker), vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1-year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 610 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (any stage; median age 72 years; median testosterone 3.93 ng/mL, median prostate-specific antigen, PSA, level 19.0 ng/mL) were randomized and received study treatment. Androgen-deprivation therapy was indicated (neoadjuvant hormonal treatment was excluded) according to the investigator's assessment. Three dosing regimens were evaluated: a starting dose of 240 mg of degarelix subcutaneous (s.c.) for 1 month, followed by s.c. maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg monthly, or intramuscular (i.m.) leuprolide doses of 7.5 mg monthly. Therapy was maintained for the 12-month study. Both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol populations were analysed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the trial was suppression of testosterone to

Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Humanos , Leuprolida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Testosterona/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 20(11): 1905-11, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16234962

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline. INTRODUCTION: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESULTS: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapéutico , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/sangre , Calcio/orina , Colágeno/sangre , Colágeno Tipo I , Creatina/orina , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Péptidos/sangre , Fósforo/sangre , Fósforo/orina , Procolágeno/sangre , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/farmacología , Teriparatido/efectos adversos , Teriparatido/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Ácido Úrico/orina , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA