Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 288, 2014 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25178538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that muscles may activate via the common nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) in response to painful stimuli associated with tensile or compressive forces on peripheral nerves. Following the basic assumption that the radial nerve may be stressed around the elbow during the execution of the Mills manipulation, two positions considered to have different mechanical effects on the radial nerve and the brachial plexus were tested in order to i) explore whether muscles are activated in certain patterns with concomitant changes in nerve tension, ii) establish whether muscle responses can be modified with mechanical unloading of the brachial plexus. METHODS: Muscle responses were quantified bilaterally in eight subjects (N = 16) during Mills Manipulation (MM) pre-manipulative positioning and a Varied position that putatively produces less mechanical tension in the brachial plexus. End range pre-manipulative stretch was used in order to simulate the effects of Mills manipulation. Electromyographic signals were recorded with a 16 channel portable EMG unit and correlated with kinematic data from three charge-coupled device adjustable cameras which allowed for precise movement tracking. RESULTS: Compared with the Standard Mills manipulation position, the Varied position produced significantly reduced myoelectric activity (P ≤ .001) in all test muscles. Additional subjective data support the notion that certain muscle activity patterns were protective. CONCLUSION: It seems that protective muscles are selectively activated in a specific pattern in order to protect the radial nerve from mechanical tension by shortening its pathway, suggesting integration of muscle and neural mechanisms. Furthermore, the significantly decreased myoelectric activity with reduced mechanical tension in the brachial plexus may help controlling collateral effects of the Mills manipulation itself, making it potentially safer and more specific.


Asunto(s)
Electromiografía/métodos , Manipulación Ortopédica/métodos , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , Extremidad Superior/inervación , Extremidad Superior/fisiología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Plexo Braquial/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ejercicios de Estiramiento Muscular/métodos , Hombro/inervación , Hombro/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 22(3): 363-9, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22284760

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: (A) Describe a new method of investigation of the possible muscular effects of the commonly practiced Mills manipulation for lateral elbow pain (epicondylalgia), (B) ascertain if myoelectric activity is influenced during the pre-manipulative stretch for Mills manipulation, (C) establish whether muscle responses are influenced by ipsilateral lateral flexion of the cervical spine which reduces mechanical tension in the peripheral nerves of the upper limb. SAMPLE: Eight asymptomatic subjects were tested bilaterally (N=16). METHODS: Myoelectric measurements - EMG signals were recorded with a 16 channel pocket EMG patient unit and processed off-line. Measurement of joint positions-three CCD adjustable cameras sensitive to 10mm reflective passive markers applied at specific locations on the subjects' bodies were used to reconstruct and verify accuracy of body movements and were correlated with EMG recordings. RESULTS: Compared with the standard (anatomical) position of the cervical spine in which Mills manipulation is typically performed, cervical spine ipsilateral lateral flexion produced significantly reduced activity in muscles that restrain the manipulation movement (elbow extension), namely biceps brachii (P=0.018) and brachioradialis (P=0.000). The affected muscles may therefore produce protective effects during the manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in myoelectric activity were in a pattern that suggests that muscle and neural mechanisms may be an integral part of the Mills manipulation. Cervical spine ipsilateral lateral flexion may be used to reduce mechanical stresses in the peripheral nerves and extraneous muscle activity, making Mills' manipulation potentially safer and more specific.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/fisiología , Contracción Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Unión Neuromuscular/fisiología , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , Postura/fisiología , Adulto , Brazo/fisiología , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Músculo Esquelético/inervación , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA