RESUMEN
Background: Most of the evidence for enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery relies on nonrandomized studies with control groups either historical or operated on at different facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate ERP in coeval groups admitted in different wards at the same hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort of consecutive patients (n = 100) undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP (ERP group) was compared with patients (n = 100) operated with traditional perioperative care in the same period at the same institution (non-ERP group). The two groups were located in separate wards and shared the same anesthesiologists. The exclusion criteria were: >80 years old, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) IV, metastatic disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS), used as a proxy of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications, readmission rate, mortality, and protocol adherence. Results: The ERP group protocol adherence was 81%. The LoS was significantly reduced in the ERP group (4 versus 7 days). The number of 30-day postoperative complications was lower in the ERP group (P < .001). No increase was found in 30-day readmission or mortality. Conventional perioperative protocol was the only predictor of any postoperative complication and, together with male sex and age 65-74 years old, was the only factor associated with prolonged LoS. Conclusion: Implementing a colorectal ERP is feasible, safe, and efficient for functional recovery, but high protocol adherence is needed. Following traditional perioperative care is associated with more postoperative complications and prolonged LoS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Laparoscopía/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The enhanced recovery program for perioperative care of the surgical patient reduces postoperative metabolic response and organ dysfunction, accelerating functional recovery. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on postoperative recovery and cost-effectiveness of implementing a colorectal enhanced recovery program in an Italian academic centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective series of consecutive patients (Nâ¯=â¯100) undergoing elective colorectal resection completing a standardized enhanced recovery program in 2013-2015 (ERP group) was compared to patients (Nâ¯=â¯100) operated at the same institution in 2010-2011 (Pre-ERP group) before introducing the program. The exclusion criteria were: >80 years old, ASA score of IV, a stage IV TNM, and diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay which was used as a proxy of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications, 30-day readmission and mortality, protocol adherence, nursing workload, cost-effectiveness, and factors predicting prolonged hospital stay. The ERP group patient satisfaction was also evaluated. RESULTS: Hospital stay was significantly reduced in the ERP versus the Pre-ERP group (4 versus 8 days) as well as nursing workload, with no increase in postoperative complications, 30-day readmission or mortality. ERP group protocol adherence (81%) and patient satisfaction were high. Conventional perioperative protocol was the only independent predictor of prolonged hospital stay. Total mean direct costs per patient were significantly higher in the Pre-ERP versus the ERP group (6796.76 versus 5339.05 euros). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a colorectal enhanced recovery program is feasible, efficient for functional recovery and hospital stay reduction, safe, and cost-effective. High patient satisfaction and nursing workload reduction may also be expected, but high protocol adherence is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Intestinales/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colon/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Perioperativa/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) have been introduced to accelerate postoperative recovery and are mainly focused on decreasing the surgical stress response. Limited data are available regarding the implementation of ERPs in patients who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using the retroperitoneal approach. The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the implementation of an ERP in patients who underwent elective retroperitoneal AAA repair; and (2) to define independent predictors of prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) in these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on 221 patients who underwent elective AAA repair via a retroperitoneal approach from 2005 through 2013 at an Italian university hospital. Patients who received surgery from 2008 through 2013 and enrolled in an ERP (n = 130) were compared with those who received surgery from 2005 through 2007 and managed with traditional perioperative care (n = 91). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. Intensive care unit admissions were prevalent among patients who received traditional care vs patients in the ERP (P < .01). ERP patients had fewer major (P < .01) and minor (P = .019) complications, and mortality was similar between groups. Complete functional recovery was achieved earlier in ERP patients vs controls (P < .01). Patients in the ERP group left the hospital earlier than controls (P < .01). No readmission ≤30 days were reported in the ERP group. Age ≥65 years and being in a conventional care protocol were found to be independent predictors of prolonged hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an ERP after elective AAA repair using a retroperitoneal approach reduced postoperative intensive care unit admission, accelerated functional recovery, and decreased morbidity and LOS with no readmission ≤30 days. Age ≥65 years and conventional perioperative care were the only independent predictors of prolonged LOS.