RESUMEN
The presence of even mild renal insufficiency is usually associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular events after coronary stenting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mild to moderate renal insufficiency on the chronic vascular responses to the implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES; Taxus) and bare-metal stents (BMS). In the TAXUS IV, TAXUS V, and TAXUS VI trials, patients with serum creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl were excluded. In the present analysis, 816 patients with serum creatinine levels
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Metales , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Creatinina/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Moduladores de Tubulina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIMS: The TAXUS Express stent has been shown to reduce angiographic restenosis, repeat revascularizations, and neointimal hyperplasia when compared with bare metal stent (BMS) control (TAXUS IV, V, and VI) in individual TAXUS trials. Since intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) methodology and core laboratory were consistent among all three TAXUS trials, an integrated analysis of 956 patients across all IVUS cohorts can be performed providing superior power. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TAXUS randomized trials, patients received an Express BMS or paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent. Volumetric analysis was performed on a selected subgroup at implantation and 9 months. Compared with BMS control, TAXUS increased 9-month lumen volumes (144 +/- 79 vs. 179 +/- 95 mm(3); P < 0.0001) due to reduced neointimal volume (66 +/- 49 vs. 27 +/- 30 mm(3); P < 0.0001). This corresponded to a 61% decrease in net lumen volume obstruction (31 +/- 15 vs. 12 +/- 12 mm(3); P < 0.0001). Lumen loss was similar between groups for the proximal 5 mm outside the stent but was reduced in TAXUS at the distal edge (P = 0.0056). Neointimal hyperplasia was significantly reduced in the double-strut region of overlapping TAXUS vs. BMS control and in high-risk patients with diabetes, long lesions, multiple stents, and multiple overlapping stents. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) was more common with moderate-release TAXUS stents. Importantly, there were no major adverse cardiac events or stent thromboses in any late-acquired ISA patient through 2 years. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed that longer lesion length and previous myocardial infarction are risk factors for late-acquired ISA. CONCLUSION: Integrated analysis of the TAXUS trials shows that the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent effectively inhibits in-stent neointimal proliferation, even in high-risk and overlapping stent patients.
Asunto(s)
Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Stents , Moduladores de Tubulina/administración & dosificación , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/patología , Método Doble Ciego , Implantes de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Revascularización Miocárdica , Polímeros , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Túnica Íntima/patología , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Smaller reference vessel diameter is a recognized determinant of in-stent restenosis. The SIRIUS 2.25 trial was a prospective, nonrandomized study including 100 patients (mean age 63.4 years; 64% men, 40% with diabetes mellitus) assessing the safety and efficacy of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent in patients with de novo native coronary lesions. Using propensity score matching for gender, diabetes mellitus, left anterior descending artery target vessel, lesion length, and reference vessel diameter, the outcomes were compared with historical control groups (angioplasty and Palmaz-Schatz stent arms from the STRESS/BENESTENT I/II trials and the Bx Velocity bare metal stent arm from the RAVEL and SIRIUS trials having a reference vessel diameter <3 mm). Use of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent was associated with a high rate of procedural success (97%) and a low rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (2%). The primary end point, 6-month in-lesion binary angiographic restenosis, occurred less frequently in patients treated with the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent than in each of 3 historical controls (16.9% vs 30.6%, p = 0.12; 36.5%, p <0.001; 45.9%, p <0.001, respectively). This translated into lower rates of 6-month target lesion revascularization in the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent group (4.0% vs 15.0% in each of 3 control groups, p = 0.01 to <0.001). By multivariate analysis, in-lesion binary restenosis was predicted by multiple implanted stents (odds ratio 10.4, p = 0.002). Four of 13 patients who developed restenosis (30.8%) had a diffuse pattern of restenosis. In the long lesion tertile (mean lesion length 19.5 mm), the in-lesion binary restenosis rate was 27.6%. In conclusion, use of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent was safe and provided favorable 6-month clinical outcomes. Use of multiple stents (in longer lesions) was an independent predictor of in-lesion restenosis.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Stents , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Reestenosis Coronaria , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The filter-based FilterWire EX (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) embolic protection system and the GuardWire (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) balloon occlusion and aspiration device have been previously shown to reduce periprocedural complication rates of percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease and are considered the standard of care in this setting. The late clinical course after treatment with these devices has not been reported. METHODS: In the FIRE trial, 651 patients undergoing SVG intervention were randomized to either the FilterWire EX or GuardWire. Six-month rates of the primary end point (composite major adverse cardiac events [MACE]) and its components (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization) were studied. RESULTS: MACE at 30 days occurred in 9.9% of patients randomized to the FilterWire EX compared with 11.6% with the GuardWire, P = .53. By 6 months, MACE had increased to 19.3% and 21.9% in FilterWire EX and GuardWire groups, respectively, (relative risk 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19; P = .44). All-cause 6-month mortality in the entire population was 3.5% (3.0% with FilterWire EX vs 4.1% with GuardWire, P = .53, with all deaths occurring after hospital discharge). MI occurred in 12.0% of patients at 6 months (12.1% vs 11.9% with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire, respectively, P = .99), and target vessel revascularization was required in 9.1% (8.2% vs 10.0%, respectively, P = .42). CONCLUSIONS: SVG intervention with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire distal protection devices resulted in similar outcomes at 6 months, although the clinical course after hospital discharge was not benign, with significant rates of death, MI, and repeat intervention.