RESUMEN
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) allows evaluation of the functional and flow changes in pericardial constriction as well as detection of acute pericardial inflammation, fusion and thickening of pericardial layers and pericardial effusion. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic role of tissue characterization by CMR in constrictive pericarditis (CP). We performed a CMR exam in 70 patients (mean age 58 ± 16) with clinical suspicion of constrictive pericarditis and constrictive pattern at echocardiography and/or catheterization. A multiparametric CMR approach was used to evaluate the initial diagnostic suspicion. A clinical follow-up was performed in all patients for a median of 551 days. The diagnosis of CP was confirmed in 53 patients while 12 patients presented signs of predominant pericardial active inflammation suggesting a diagnosis of transient constrictive pericarditis and five presented effusive-constrictive pericarditis. Patients with a final diagnosis of CP had worse prognosis than those with transient constrictive or effusive constrictive pericarditis. The presence of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement was associated to adverse events. Results of the current study confirmed the value of CMR in the differential diagnosis of pericardial disease. A multiparametric CMR approach allowed to distinguish between active inflammation, chronic pericarditis with constriction and effusion without inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Derrame Pericárdico/patología , Pericarditis Constrictiva/patología , Pericardio/patología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Medios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derrame Pericárdico/fisiopatología , Derrame Pericárdico/cirugía , Pericardiectomía , Pericardiocentesis , Pericarditis Constrictiva/fisiopatología , Pericarditis Constrictiva/cirugía , Pericardio/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Aortic stiffness is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) allows evaluation of aortic elastic properties by different indexes such as distensibility, the maximum rate of systolic distension (MRSD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). We sought to define age-dependent changes of indexes of elastic properties of the thoracic aorta in healthy subjects. METHODS: We enrolled 85 healthy subjects (53 males) free of overt cardiovascular disease subdivided into 6 classes of age (from 15 to >60 years). Distensibility, MRSD and PWV were measured by the analysis of CMR images acquired using a 1.5 T clinical scanner. RESULTS: MRSD and distensibility decreased progressively through the classes of age (P < 0.001) after an initial plateau between 20 and 30 years in males and 15 and 20 years in females. Pulse wave velocity increased progressively with the age (P < 0.001). Distensibility was related to body mass index (P = 0.002), surface area (P < 0.005), weight (P = 0.005) and to left ventricular parameters such as mass index (P < 0.001) and end-diastolic volume index (P = 0.002). MRSD was related to end-diastolic volume index (P < 0.001) but not to body parameters. PWV was not related to body and ventricular parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that physiological ageing is associated with a progressive impairment of the elastic properties of the aortic wall. Results of this study may be useful for the early identification of subjects with impaired aortic wall properties providing referral values of elasticity indexes assessed by CMR in different classes of age.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Aorta Torácica/fisiología , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Rigidez Vascular , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The EuroCMR registry sought to evaluate indications, image quality, safety and impact on patient management of clinical routine CMR in a multi-national European setting. Furthermore, interim analysis of the specific protocols should underscore the prognostic potential of CMR. METHODS: Multi-center registry with consecutive enrolment of patients in 57 centers in 15 countries. More than 27000 consecutive patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The most important indications were risk stratification in suspected CAD/Ischemia (34.2%), workup of myocarditis/cardiomyopathies (32.2%), as well as assessment of viability (14.6%). Image quality was diagnostic in more than 98% of cases. Severe complications occurred in 0.026%, always associated with stress testing. No patient died during or due to CMR. In 61.8% CMR findings impacted on patient management. Importantly, in nearly 8.7% the final diagnosis based on CMR was different to the diagnosis before CMR, leading to a complete change in management. Interim analysis of suspected CAD and risk stratification in HCM specific protocols revealed a low rate of adverse events for suspected CAD patients with normal stress CMR (1.0% per year), and for HCM patients without LGE (2.7% per year). CONCLUSION: The most important indications in Europe are risk stratification in suspected CAD/Ischemia, work-up of myocarditis and cardiomyopathies, as well as assessment of viability. CMR imaging is a safe procedure, has diagnostic image quality in more than 98% of cases, and its results have strong impact on patient management. Interim analyses of the specific protocols underscore the prognostic value of clinical routine CMR in CAD and HCM.