RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a gender sensitivity index and analyse the regional mental health plans in force in 2021 in terms of their gender sensitivity. METHOD: We reviewed the regional mental health plans in force in 2021 using an ad hoc questionnaire design based on a review of documents and reports on gender sensitivity in health policies. We construct an index based on both the symbolic and operative sensibility of plans. RESULTS: Of the seven plans reviewed, four scored less than 13 out of 26. The maximum score was 18 and the minimum 2. Symbolic gender sensitivity was higher than operational sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health plans have a low or very low degree of gender sensitivity. Not considering gender as a determinant of mental health in the formulation of specific health plans may reduce the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing gender inequalities in mental health.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Elaborar un índice de sensibilidad de género y determinar el grado de sensibilidad de género de los planes de salud mental autonómicos vigentes en 2021. Método: Se revisaron los planes de salud mental autonómicos vigentes en 2021 utilizando un cuestionario ad hoc diseñado a partir de una revisión de documentos e informes sobre la sensibilidad de género en políticas de salud. Se construyó un índice basado en la sensibilidad simbólica y operativa de los planes. Resultados: Se revisaron siete planes y la mayoría obtuvieron una puntuación menor de 13 sobre 26. La puntuación máxima fue 18 y la mínima 2. La sensibilidad de género simbólica fue mayor que la operativa. Conclusiones: Los planes de salud mental tienen un grado bajo o muy bajo de sensibilidad de género. No tener en cuenta el género como determinante de la salud mental en la formulación de los planes de salud específicos impedirá la puesta en marcha de intervenciones enfocadas a reducir las desigualdades de género en salud mental.(AU)

Objective: To develop a gender sensitivity index and analyse the regional mental health plans in force in 2021 in terms of their gender sensitivity. Method: We reviewed the regional mental health plans in force in 2021 using an ad hoc questionnaire design based on a review of documents and reports on gender sensitivity in health policies. We construct an index based on both the symbolic and operative sensibility of plans. Results: Of the seven plans reviewed, four scored less than 13 out of 26. The maximum score was 18 and the minimum 2. Symbolic gender sensitivity was higher than operational sensitivity. Conclusions: Mental health plans have a low or very low degree of gender sensitivity. Not considering gender as a determinant of mental health in the formulation of specific health plans may reduce the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing gender inequalities in mental health.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Analizar la composición por sexo de los comités de personas expertas creados para la gestión y la toma de decisiones políticas durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en España. Método: Se realizó una revisión por pares para identificar los comités destinados a la gestión de la COVID-19 en las comunidades autónomas y de ámbito estatal. Se recopilaron el nombre, el número de integrantes, el sexo y las fuentes de información, y se calculó el porcentaje de mujeres. Resultados: En las comunidades autónomas se identificó la composición de 11 comités específicos, con una media de representación de las mujeres del 39,2%, siendo del 42,9% en todo el Estado. El 75% del conjunto de los comités representó a las mujeres por debajo del umbral de paridad. Conclusiones: Existe una significativa infrarrepresentación de las mujeres en los comités para la gestión de la COVID-19, lo que puede limitar la necesaria mirada feminista para la recuperación de la crisis. (AU)

Objective: To analyse the gender composition of the advisory boards created for the management and policy decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Method: A peer review was carried out to identify the advisory boards involved in the management of COVID-19 in the autonomous regions and in Spain. Name, number of members, sex and sources of information were collected, and the percentage of women was calculated. Results: At the regional level, the composition of eleven advisory boards was identified, with a mean representation of women of 39.2%; 42.9% at the national level. 75% of all boards represented women below the parity threshold. Conclusions: There is a significant under-representation of women in the advisory boards for the COVID-19 management, which may limit a necessary feminist perspective for the crisis recovery. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the gender composition of the advisory boards created for the management and policy decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. METHOD: A peer review was carried out to identify the advisory boards involved in the management of COVID-19 in the autonomous regions and in Spain. Name, number of members, sex and sources of information were collected, and the percentage of women was calculated. RESULTS: At the regional level, the composition of eleven advisory boards was identified, with a mean representation of women of 39.2%; 42.9% at the national level. 75% of all boards represented women below the parity threshold. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant under-representation of women in the advisory boards for the COVID-19 management, which may limit a necessary feminist perspective for the crisis recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gender segmentation in the labour market and women's greater burden of domestic work and caregiving increase their risk of developing mental health problems, especially in vulnerable social groups. AIMS: The objectives of this study were to identify and describe the role of working and labour conditions, domestic work and caregiving and social support in gender inequalities in mental health, as well as to assess whether studies have taken an intersectional approach, describing its role in gender inequalities in mental health. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of scientific articles published between 2010 and 2019 in PubMed, Scopus, WoS and PsycInfo, in Spanish and English, conducted in the European Economic Area in populations aged between 25 and 65 years. Studies were excluded if they were qualitative, focused on sexual identity or factors based on biological differences, or considered use of medical services, medicalisation or suicide as the outcome variable. RESULTS: A total of 30 articles were included, of which only four concerned studies in which intersectional analysis had been performed. The mental health of men was seen to be more influenced by employment conditions and that of women by working conditions, the double presence and civil status. Further, depending on the size of the household (women) and unemployment (men), people in lower social classes had poorer mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results may be useful for designing policies focused on reducing gender inequalities in mental health. Additionally, they show the need for taking an intersectional perspective.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 lockdown was imposed in a context of notable inequalities in the distribution of the social determinants of health. It is possible that the housing conditions in which children and their families experienced the confinement, and the adoption of healthy behaviors, may have followed unequal patterns. The aim was to describe social inequalities in housing conditions and in health-related behaviors among children during the lockdown in Spain. This cross-sectional study was based on data from an online survey collecting information on the child population (3-12 years) living in Spain (n = 10,765). The outcome variables used were several housing conditions and health-related behaviors. The socioeconomic variables used were financial difficulties and parents' educational level. Crude prevalence and prevalence ratios estimated using Poisson models were calculated. During lockdown, children from families with low educational levels and financial difficulties not only tended to live in poor housing conditions, but were also exposed to negative health determinants such as noise and tobacco smoke; they took less physical exercise, had a poorer diet, spent more time in front of screens and had less social contact. A notable social gradient was found in most of the variables analyzed. The results point to the need to incorporate the perspective of equity in the adoption of policies in order to avoid the increase of pre-existing social inequalities in the context of a pandemic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

It is well known that women are more likely than men to be diagnosed with depression and to consume antidepressants. The factors related to the medicalisation of depression and their social distribution remain unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse gender inequalities in the medicalisation of depression from an intersectional perspective. This was a cross-sectional study based on data from the European Health Survey relating to Spain. Gender inequalities were calculated using prevalence ratios of women compared to men with a diagnosis of depression and antidepressant use, adjusted for age, depressive symptoms, primary care visits and diagnosis of depression in the case of antidepressant use. After adjustments, the diagnosis of depression and the use of antidepressants were more prevalent in women, especially of lower socioeconomic levels. Gender inequalities in the diagnosis of depression also increased with decreasing level of education. Regarding the use of antidepressants, gender inequalities were not significant in university graduates and people of higher social. The gender inequalities found in the diagnosis and treatment of depression cannot be completely attributed to a higher level of depressive symptoms in women or their greater frequency of visits to primary care. Inequalities are greater in more vulnerable social groups.

Asunto(s)