RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the angular tolerance of the S1 and S2 segments to accommodate a transiliosacral screw across both sacroiliac joints. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the angular tolerance for transiliosacral screw placement would be more constrained than the angular tolerance for iliosacral fixation in pelves where a safe osseous corridor was measured. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cortical boundaries of the S1 and S2 sacral segments in 433 pelvic CTs were digitally mapped. A straight-line path was placed within each osseous corridor and extended across both SI joints past the outer iliac cortices. The diameter of the path was increased until it breached the cortex, geometrically determining maximum diameter (Dmax). Angular tolerance for screw placement was calculated with trigonometric analysis of the Dmax value of the corridor, and the average distance from the termination of the osseous corridor to the site of percutaneous insertion. Gender, age, and BMI were evaluated as independent predictors using binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: The transiliosacral angular tolerance for the S1 and S2 osseous corridors was 1.53 ± 0.57 degrees and 1.02 ± 0.33 degrees, respectively. 68.9% of S1 corridors and 81.1% of S2 corridors had a safe zone (corridor diameter ≥ 10 mm) for transiliosacral placement, 48.3% of the pelves had a safe zone for both corridors, while 5.1% had no safe zones. Females had a less frequent Dmax ≥ 10 mm at S1, 52% vs 67% (p = 0.001), and at S2, 64% vs 86% (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the angular tolerance of 1.53 and 1.03 degrees for the S1 and S2 segments, respectively, creating a narrow interval for safe passage of the trans-iliac and trans-sacral, with approximately 31.1% of patients not having a viable corridor for screw passage. A correlation exist between S1 and S2 corridors with Dmax ≥ 10 mm and the resulting increase in angular tolerance for safe passage of a transilioscral screw. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Level Retrospective Cohort.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Sacro , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Ilion/cirugía , Pelvis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sacro/cirugíaRESUMEN
The suprapatellar nailing technique is an important adjunct in the armamentarium of an orthopedic surgeon. Although a variety of new instrumentations are required for insertion of the suprapatellar nail, most companies now carry these instruments. Easier positioning, maintenance of reduction, ease of intraoperative fluoroscopy, more anatomic starting trajectory, decreased malreduction rates, and possible decrease in anterior knee pain are all benefits of suprapatellar nailing, thus making mastery of this technique essential for an orthopedic surgeon.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Reducción Cerrada/instrumentación , Reducción Cerrada/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Rodilla , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Radiografía , Factores de Riesgo , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Mangled upper extremity, as a result of trauma, is a life-altering event requiring a multidisciplinary approach for a successful outcome. All attempts are made to salvage the extremity and preserve function, which may require multiple complex procedures. This paper discusses the importance of a systematic reconstructive sequence and provides a review of commonly utilized techniques, supported with illustrative cases.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Brazo/diagnóstico , Traumatismos del Brazo/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Algoritmos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Extremidad Superior/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate mechanically superior method of pilon fracture fixation by comparing axial stiffness between anterolateral and medial tibial locking plates in a cadaveric fracture model. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaver specimens (lower limb after through-knee disarticulation) were used to eliminate confounder of bone quality. Simulated pilon fractures were created so that each pair represented either varus or valgus fracture pattern (AO 43-A2) with associated fibular fractures (transverse or comminuted). Specimens were plated with DePuy anterolateral or medial locking plate and axial load applied, measuring displacement at the fracture site. Each lower extremity was tested with a fracture wedge in place and removed to mimic comminution. Average force at which failure occurred was compared between the two fixation methods, for varus and valgus fracture pattern respectively, with the use of a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: On average, medial plate fixation of varus fractures resulted in 2.27 times (range of 1.6-3.9) greater load prior to failure as compared to anterolateral plate. Similarly, valgus simulated fractures tolerated 1.6 times (range 1.12-2.34) higher force prior to failure if anterolateral plate was applied versus medial plate. Analysis utilizing the Mann-Whitney U test for fracture patterns vs plate configuration approached statistical significance (p = 0.081 varus failure and p = 0.386 valgus failure). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral plate fixation is biomechanically superior for pilon fractures resulting from valgus force as evident by comminuted fibular fracture. Similarly, medial plate location resulted in improved stiffness in compression for varus type fractures, evident by transverse fibular fracture. We approached statistical significance, however our lack of power regarding adequate sample size is an issue that is consistent with other biomechanical studies in this area.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Comminuted fibular fractures can occur with pilon fractures as a result of valgus stress. Transverse fibular fractures can occur with varus deformation. No definitive guide for determining the proper location of tibial fixation exists. The purpose of this study was to identify optimal plate location for fixation of pilon fractures based on the orientation of the fibular fracture. METHODS: One hundred two patients with 103 pilon fractures were identified who were definitively treated at our institution from 2004 to 2013. Pilon fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification and included 43-A through 43-C fractures. Inclusion criteria were age of at least 18 years, associated fibular fracture, and definitive tibial plating. Patients were grouped based on the fibular component fracture type (comminuted vs transverse), and the location of plate fixation (medial vs lateral) was noted. Radiographic outcomes were assessed for mechanical failures. RESULTS: Forty fractures were a result of varus force as evidenced by transverse fracture of the fibula and 63 were due to valgus force with a comminuted fibula. For the transverse fibula group, 14.3% mechanical complications were noted for medially placed plate vs 80% for lateral plating ( P = .006). For the comminuted fibular group, 36.4% of medially placed plates demonstrated mechanical complications vs 16.7% for laterally based plates ( P = .156). Time to weight bearing as tolerated was also noted to be significant between groups plated medially and laterally for the comminuted group ( P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Correctly assessing the fibular component for pilon fractures provides valuable information regarding deforming forces. To limit mechanical complications, tibial plates should be applied in such a way as to resist the original deforming forces. Level of Evidence Level III, comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Placas Óseas/normas , Peroné/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Tibia/fisiopatología , Fracturas Conminutas , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric spine trauma often results from high-energy mechanisms. Despite differences in healing potential, comorbidities, and length of remaining life, treatment is frequently based on adult criteria; ligamentous injuries are fused and bony injuries are treated accordingly. In this study, we present short-term results of a select group of adolescent patients treated using percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation without fusion. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed at a level 1 pediatric trauma center for thoracolumbar spine fractures treated by percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients were excluded if arthrodesis was performed or if instrumentation was not removed. Demographics, injury mechanism, associated injuries, fracture classification, surgical data, radiographic measures, and complications were collected. Radiographs were analyzed for sagittal and coronal wedge angles and vertebral body height ratio and statistical comparisons performed on preoperative and postoperative values. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2013, 46 patients were treated surgically. Fourteen patients (5 male, 9 female) met inclusion criteria. Injury mechanisms included 8 motor vehicle collisions, 4 falls, and 2 all-terrain vehicle/motorcycle collisions. There were 8 Magerl type A injuries, 4 type B injuries, and 2 type C injuries. There was 1 incomplete spinal cord injury. Implants were removed between 5 and 12 months in 12 patients and after 12 months in 2 patients. Statistical analysis revealed significant postoperative improvement in all radiographic measures (P<0.05). There were no neurological complications, 1 superficial wound dehiscence, and 2 instrumentation failures (treated with standard removal). At last follow-up, 11 patients returned to unrestricted activities including sports. Average follow-up was 9 months after implant removal and 19.3 months after index procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent thoracolumbar fractures present unique challenges and treatment opportunities different from the adult patient. We present a nonconsecutive series of 14 patients temporarily stabilized with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for injuries including 3-column fracture dislocations and purely ligamentous injuries. Temporary fusionless instrumentation can provide successful management of select thoracolumbar spine injuries in pediatric trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Retrospective case series.