Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 26(2): 157-164, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33210345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The early integration of supportive care in oncology improves patient-centered outcomes. However, data are lacking regarding how to achieve this in resource-limited settings. We studied whether patient navigation increased access to multidisciplinary supportive care among Mexican patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 2017 and April 2018 at a public hospital in Mexico City. Patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic tumors ≤6 weeks from diagnosis were randomized (1:1) to a patient navigation intervention or usual care. Patients randomized to patient navigation received personalized supportive care from a navigator and a multidisciplinary team. Patients randomized to usual care obtained supportive care referrals from treating oncologists. The primary outcome was the implementation of supportive care interventions at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion, supportive care needs, and quality of life. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were randomized: 67 to patient navigation and 67 to usual care. Supportive care interventions were provided to 74% of patients in the patient navigation arm versus 24% in usual care (difference 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.62; p < .0001). In the patient navigation arm, 48% of eligible patients completed advance directives, compared with 0% in usual care (p < .0001). At 12 weeks, patients randomized to patient navigation had less moderate/severe pain (10% vs. 33%; difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38; p = .006), without differences in quality of life between arms. CONCLUSION: Patient navigation improves access to early supportive care, advance care planning, and pain for patients with advanced cancer in resource-limited settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The early implementation of supportive care in oncology is recommended by international guidelines, but this might be difficult to achieve in resource-limited settings. This randomized clinical trial including 134 Mexican patients with advanced cancer demonstrates that a multidisciplinary patient navigation intervention can improve the early access to supportive and palliative care interventions, increase advance care planning, and reduce symptoms compared with usual oncologist-guided care alone. These results demonstrate that patient navigation represents a potentially useful solution to achieve the adequate implementation of supportive and palliative care in resource-limited settings globally.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Navegación de Pacientes , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , México , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida
2.
Oncologist ; 24(9): 1195-1200, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30498134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventions aimed at improving access to timely cancer care for patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are urgently needed. We aimed to evaluate a patient navigation (PN) program to reduce referral time to cancer centers for underserved patients with a suspicion or diagnosis of cancer at a public general hospital in Mexico City. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to March 2017, consecutive patients aged >18 years with a suspicion or diagnosis of cancer seen at Ajusco Medio General Hospital in Mexico City who required referral to a specialized center for diagnosis or treatment were enrolled. A patient navigator assisted patients with scheduling, completing paperwork, obtaining results in a timely manner, transportation, and addressing other barriers to care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who obtained a specialized consultation at a cancer center within the first 3 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Seventy patients (median age 54, range 19-85) participated in this study. Ninety-six percent (n = 67) identified >1 barrier to cancer care access. The most commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial burden (n = 50) and fear (n = 37). Median time to referral was 7 days (range 0-49), and time to specialist appointment was 27 days (range 1-97). Ninety-one percent of patients successfully obtained appointments at cancer centers in <3 months. CONCLUSION: Implementing PN in LMIC is feasible, and may lead to shortened referral times for specialized cancer care by helping overcome barriers to health care access among underserved patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A patient navigation program for patients with suspicion or diagnosis of cancer in a second-level hospital was feasible and acceptable. It reduced patient-reported barriers, and referral time to specialized appointments and treatment initiation were within international recommended limits. Patient navigation may improve access to care for underserved patients in developing countries.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Navegación de Pacientes , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Pobreza , Derivación y Consulta , Poblaciones Vulnerables
7.
Cancer ; 123(8): 1313-1323, 2017 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182258

RESUMEN

Lack of access to high-cost medications is a complex issue at the intersection of economics, medicine, politics, and ethics, and it poses a significant threat to global health care. The problem is even more significant in low- and middle-income countries, such as those in Latin America, where governments and individuals struggle to pay for products that are priced at several times the level of their per capita gross domestic product. In this review, we examine the determinants for increasing drug costs and how Latin American countries face this burgeoning crisis. We emphasize that a number of opportunities and strategies to reduce costs and improve access exist and should be identified and implemented, ideally within a regional approach with multiple stakeholders involved and based on systematic and transparent cost-effectiveness analyses. Cancer 2017;123:1313-1323. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/economía , Investigación Biomédica , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA