RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among rheumatology outpatients from an early COVID-19 "hotspot" during the initial period of vaccine availability. METHODS: In March 2021, a Web-based survey was sent to 7505 adults seen at a Rheumatology Division in New York City. We evaluated characteristics associated with 3 categories of COVID-19 vaccination status: declined, undecided, and willing/already received. We used multinomial logistic regression models to calculate relative risk ratios assessing predictors of vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 2384 (32%) respondents (80% female, 87% White, 59% with systemic rheumatic disease), 2240 (94.0%) were willing/already received COVID-19 vaccination, 88 (3.7%) were undecided, and 56 (2.3%) declined. Compared with those willing/already vaccinated, those declining or undecided were younger, more likely identified as Black or Hispanic/Latinx, and had lower household income and educational attainment. Immunosuppressive medication use did not differ among groups. After multivariable adjustment, every 1-year increase in age was associated with a 0.96 lower relative risk of declining or being undecided versus willing/already vaccinated. Respondents identifying as Black versus White had a higher relative risk ratio of being undecided (4.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.96-9.36]), as did those identifying as Hispanic/Latinx versus non-Hispanic/non-Latinx (2.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-6.09]). Those declining vaccination were least likely to believe in general vaccine importance or the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Among rheumatology patients in New York City with and without systemic rheumatic disease, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high after its initial availability. Sociodemographic but not medication-related factors were associated with vaccine hesitancy; these findings can inform future rheumatology vaccination programs.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , VacunaciónRESUMEN
With the increase in the US of the number of older adults living with HIV, more research is needed to understand the caregiving and advance care planning needs of this population. This descriptive study examined the relationship between social support and caregiving preferences and advance care planning. Older adults living with HIV were recruited from clinics in Los Angeles, CA and New Orleans, LA to complete cross-sectional surveys (n = 154). Logistic regression analyses were modeled to determine the characteristics associated with 1) preference for formal short-term term care, 2) preference for formal long-term care, 3) having at least one contact for emergency care, 4) having an advance directive or living will, and 5) having a healthcare proxy or agent. The mean age was 56.8 years. The majority of participants indicated a preference for informal support for both short-term (73.4%) and long-term care (66.2%), 13.2% had no one they could call for emergency care, 26.0% had an advance directive/living will, and 30.5% had a healthcare proxy/agent. In adjusted models, greater social support was associated with preference for informal short-term care and with having at least one emergency contact. Findings suggest that older adults living with HIV prefer informal sources of support for their caregiving needs despite having small social networks and individuals with limited social networks are particularly vulnerable due to lack of access to caregivers in sudden or unexpected health situations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/enfermería , Voluntad en Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoderado/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
Increased attention has highlighted the role of age and sexual development on HIV risk among Black MSM (BMSM); limited focus has been given to the relationship of sexual positioning to HIV risk along the life course. This study examined BMSM's life course sexual positioning practices and accompanying HIV/STI risks. Twenty-six Black gay and bisexual men ages 24-61 completed life history interviews in Los Angeles, California, between September and November 2015. Thematic analysis evaluated domains including major life events, substance use, social support, and partner selection. Varying exposure to HIV treatment and prevention options and venues to meet male partners revealed generational differences in sexual risks. Childhood sexual abuse and internalized homonegativity impacted personal development, sexual positioning, and condom negotiation. BMSM also assumed sexual positioning using masculinity stereotypes and body language. Clarifying the sexual development and HIV/STI risk contexts among BMSM could better inform current treatment and prevention needs.
Asunto(s)
Bisexualidad/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina/etnología , Masculinidad , Asunción de Riesgos , Parejas Sexuales , Sexo Inseguro/psicología , Adulto , Bisexualidad/psicología , Población Negra , Condones , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores de Riesgo , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Apoyo Social , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Emphasis has been placed on HIV testing and health care engagement, but little is known about how testing and engagement intersect, especially for men. We used latent class analysis to explore underlying profiles of U.S. men regarding HIV testing and health care utilization using data from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. Multinomial regression was used to predict class membership in four classes: (a) Low HIV Testing/No Health Care Utilization, (b) Some HIV Testing/Low Health Care Utilization, (c) No HIV Testing/Some Health Care Utilization, and (d) High HIV Testing/High Health Care Utilization. Most men were in the No HIV Testing/Some Health Care Utilization class (46%), with a 0% chance of ever having had an HIV test but an 89% chance of seeing a general practitioner in the previous year. Research should include qualitative measures to capture information on facilitators and barriers to HIV testing for men who see general practitioners.