RESUMEN
The post-September 11 era has prompted unprecedented attention to medical preparations for national special security events (NSSE), requiring extraordinary planning and coordination among federal, state, and local agencies. For an NSSE, the US Secret Service (USSS) serves as the lead agency for all security operations and coordinates with relevant partners to provide for the safety and welfare of participants. For the 2004 Democratic National Convention (DNC), designated an NSSE, the USSS tasked the Boston Emergency Medical Services (BEMS) of the Boston Public Health Commission with the design and implementation of health services related to the Convention. In this article, we describe the planning and development of BEMS' robust 2004 DNC Medical Consequence Management Plan, addressing the following activities: public health surveillance, on-site medical care, surge capacity in the event of a mass casualty incident, and management of federal response assets. Lessons learned from enhanced medical planning for the 2004 DNC may serve as an effective model for future mass gathering events.
Asunto(s)
Aniversarios y Eventos Especiales , Medicina de Desastres/organización & administración , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Medidas de Seguridad/organización & administración , Boston , Medicina de Desastres/métodos , Planificación en Desastres/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Vigilancia de la Población , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de SeptiembreAsunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Administración en Salud Pública , Universidades/organización & administración , Boston , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the speeds and success rates of placement for percutaneous cricothyrotomy versus surgical or open cricothyrotomy. METHODS: Twenty-two paramedics (mean 9.7 years of experience), with training in both methods, were timed using a pig trachea in a crossover model. An emergency physician performed timing and documentation of success; timing commenced after the equipment was ready and the membrane was identified. Paramedics were randomly assigned by a coin toss to start in either group. All were actively employed by a municipal third-service emergency medical services (EMS) agency. Paramedics who did not complete one of the methods correctly were excluded from speed analysis. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, a t-test of paired samples, and confidence intervals for matched samples. RESULTS: Placement of a surgical cricothyrotomy was significantly faster (mean 28 seconds, range 10-78 seconds) than the percutaneous method (mean 123 seconds, range 58-257 seconds) (p < 0.001). Mean difference between the 20 matched percutaneous versus surgical pairs was 93.75 seconds (95% CI 72.3, 115.2). The surgical route had a 100% success rate at obtaining airway control, whereas the percutaneous method had a 90.9% success rate (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: In an animal model, surgical cricothyrotomy appeared to be a preferable method for establishing a definitive airway over the percutaneous method. Further research is required to define the optimal approach in the prehospital setting for the invasive airway.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Traqueotomía/métodos , Adulto , Animales , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Porcinos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The Boston Public Health Commission developed and implemented an active surveillance system for bioterrorism and other infectious disease emergencies. A bioterrorism Surveillance Task Force was formed with representatives from local emergency medicine, infection control, infectious diseases, public health, and emergency medical services. These local agencies worked together to develop a reliable, easy to use electronic surveillance system. Collaboration at the local level and building on existing relationships is a key component of this system. Effective follow-up systems and technology back-up plans are essential. Improved communication networks and increased bioterrorism education for clinicians and the general public have also been achieved.