RESUMEN
Coronary calcified lesions are commonly encountered and coronary atherectomy is commonly used for lesion modification during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The release of adenosine during atherectomy can result in bradyarrhythmias and aminophylline is commonly used to prevent this reaction. We identified 138 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy. A total of 159 calcified lesions were treated, and the atherectomy device was orbital atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, and both in 52 %, 42 %, and 6 %; respectively. After administration of aminophylline, 4.3 % of patients required intraprocedural insertion of a transvenous pacer (TVP), and 18.1 % of patients required administration of IV atropine. Technical success was achieved in 98.6 % of patients, and no adverse reactions to aminophylline were reported. All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, aminophylline administration prior to coronary atherectomy was safe and effective. No adverse effects of aminophylline were seen, and the rate of bailout TVP placement was low.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life in patients with stable angina and normal gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) remains undefined. Symptom evolution in response to imaging findings has important implications on further diagnostic testing and therapeutic interventions. METHODS: Prospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham enrolling 87 adult participants with stable chest pain from the emergency room, hospital setting, and outpatient clinics. Patients underwent MPI with technetium-99m Sestamibi and had a normal study. Participants filled out Seattle Angina Questionnaires initially and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 87 participants (60 ± 12 years; 40% African American, 70% women, 29% diabetes), the mean score increased by an absolute value of 14.2 [95% CI 10.4-18.7, P < .001] in physical limitation, 23.2 [95% CI 17.1-29.4, P < .001] in angina stability, 10.9 [95% CI 7.6-14.1, P < .001] in angina frequency, and 20.6 [95% CI 16.5-24.7, P < .001] in disease perception. There was no significant change in the mean score of treatment satisfaction [- 1.4, 95% CI - 4.7 to 1.8, P = .38]. At 3-month follow-up, 28 of 87 participants (32%) were angina free. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable chest pain and normal MPI experience significant improvement in functional status, quality of life, and disease perception in the short term.
Asunto(s)
Angina Estable , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica , Adulto , Angina Estable/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Perfusión , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Purinas , Pirazoles , Calidad de Vida , Cintigrafía , Tecnecio Tc 99m Sestamibi , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón ÚnicoRESUMEN
We report a case of a 59-year-old male in post-myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock undergoing left atrial venous arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (LAVA-ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation. The unique feature of this ECMO configuration is use of a single trans-septal cannula to provide biventricular unloading and use of a single arterial access.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Infarto del Miocardio , Cánula , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adenosine or regadenoson are often used with pharmacologic stress testing. Adenosine may trigger atrioventricular block (AVB). Despite its higher selectivity, regadenoson has also been associated with AVB. We studied the incidence of de novo AVB with these agents. METHODS: A comprehensive search of SCOPUS was performed from inception to March 2016. Studies of at least 10 patients, using adenosine and/or regadenoson with SPECT-MPI, reporting rates of AVB were selected for further review. RESULTS: Thirty four studies were pooled including 22,957 patients. Adenosine was used in 21 studies and regadenoson in 15. Both were administered in two studies. The estimated incidence of overall and high-grade AVB was 3.81% (95% CI 1.99%-6.19%) and 1.93% (95% CI 0.77%-3.59%), respectively. The incidence of AVB (8.58%; 95% CI 5.55%-12.21% vs 0.30%; 95% CI 0.04%-0.82%, respectively, P < .001) and high-grade AVB (5.21%; 95% CI 2.81%-8.30% vs 0.05%; 95% CI < .001%-0.19% respectively, P < .001) were higher with adenosine compared to regadenoson. CONCLUSION: AVB is seen in about 4% of patients undergoing vasodilator stress test. Both overall and high-grade AVB are more frequent with adenosine compared to regadenoson.