Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vet Microbiol ; 160(3-4): 378-86, 2012 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22763172

RESUMEN

Porcine brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of truly global significance because even in countries without the disease the occurrence of false positive serological reactions (FPSRs) creates significant problems. Statutory diagnostic testing is required in many disease free countries or regions and is often a prerequisite for the movement of live animals. Currently this testing is dependent almost entirely on serological assays and these may result in a significant number of FPSRs. The aim of this study was to examine existing and novel serodiagnostic assays to evaluate their diagnostic sensitivity and resilience to FPSRs. The existing assays evaluated were the RBT, smooth lipopolysaccharide (sLPS) indirect (i) ELISA, sLPS competitive (c) ELISA, and the FPA. The novel assays evaluated were the sLPS TR-FRET assay, a rough (r) LPS iELISA, a recombinant protein BP26 iELISA and a cytoplasmic protein extract (Brucellergene™) iELISA. Four populations of sera were evaluated: those from Brucella suis infected swine (n=34), randomly selected samples from non-infected swine (n=161), sera from non-infected swine within herds exhibiting FPSRs (n=132) and sera from swine experimentally infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 (n=4). The results show that all the assays dependent on the sLPS O-polysaccharide (OPS) for their sensitivity (the RBT, sLPS ELISAs, FPA and the sLPS TR-FRET) had significantly reduced diagnostic specificity when applied to the FPSR population, the RBT being most affected. Of the two rapid homogeneous assays, the TR-FRET was diagnostically superior to the FPA in this study. Neither of the protein based iELISAs demonstrated sufficient diagnostic sensitivity to resolve the FPSRs. The rLPS iELISA showed no cross reaction with the FPSRs and had diagnostic sensitivity similar to that of the OPS based assays.


Asunto(s)
Brucelosis/veterinaria , Pruebas Serológicas/veterinaria , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella suis , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Reacciones Cruzadas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/normas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Pruebas Serológicas/normas , Porcinos , Yersiniosis/diagnóstico , Yersiniosis/inmunología , Yersinia enterocolitica/inmunología
2.
Vet Res Commun ; 32(3): 209-13, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17934790

RESUMEN

This report describes the use of cell mediated immunity to improve specificity of current diagnosis for Brucella suis. Diagnosis is problematic due to cross reactions that lead to false positive serological reactions (FPSR) in the standard diagnostic tests. A common cause of this cross reactivity is infection with the organism Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Gottingen mini-pigs were experimentally infected with B. suis biovar I field strain or Y. enterocolitica serotype O:9 biotype 3. Infection was followed for 70 days. During this time whole blood stimulation assays were set up using Brucella specific antigen. IFNgamma was measured in the supernatants (SN) from these assays by ELISA. Concurrent standard serological tests were carried out. The results indicate that the IFNgamma assay is specifically able to distinguish Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection from a B. suis infection in experimentally infected mini-pigs. These results represent an improvement in diagnostic specificity compared to currently used serological tests. Thus suggesting that in a surveillance setting this test could be applied as a confirmatory test in the face of FPSR.


Asunto(s)
Brucella suis/aislamiento & purificación , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Interferón gamma/sangre , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Análisis de Varianza , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/normas , Femenino , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/inmunología , Porcinos Enanos , Factores de Tiempo , Yersiniosis/diagnóstico , Yersiniosis/veterinaria , Yersinia enterocolitica/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Vet Pathol ; 43(3): 321-38, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16672579

RESUMEN

More than 10,000 Caspian seals (Phoca caspica) were reported dead in the Caspian Sea during spring and summer 2000. We performed necropsies and extensive laboratory analyses on 18 seals, as well as examination of the pattern of strandings and variation in weather in recent years, to identify the cause of mortality and potential contributory factors. The monthly stranding rate in 2000 was up to 2.8 times the historic mean. It was preceded by an unusually mild winter, as observed before in mass mortality events of pinnipeds. The primary diagnosis in 11 of 13 seals was canine distemper, characterized by broncho-interstitial pneumonia, lymphocytic necrosis and depletion in lymphoid organs, and the presence of typical intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in multiple epithelia. Canine distemper virus infection was confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction products. Organochlorine and zinc concentrations in tissues of seals with canine distemper were comparable to those of Caspian seals in previous years. Concurrent bacterial infections that may have contributed to the mortality of the seals included Bordetella bronchiseptica (4/8 seals), Streptococcus phocae (3/8), Salmonella dublin (1/8), and S. choleraesuis (1/8). A newly identified bacterium, Corynebacterium caspium, was associated with balanoposthitis in one seal. Several infectious and parasitic organisms, including poxvirus, Atopobacter phocae, Eimeria- and Sarcocystis-like organisms, and Halarachne sp. were identified in Caspian seals for the first time.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Virus del Moquillo Canino/fisiología , Moquillo/epidemiología , Moquillo/patología , Phoca/virología , Animales , Azerbaiyán , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Moquillo/complicaciones , Moquillo/virología , Virus del Moquillo Canino/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Hidrocarburos Clorados , Masculino , Océanos y Mares , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Parasitarias en Animales/parasitología , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Rev Sci Tech ; 25(3): 1039-53, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361769

RESUMEN

The principal methods for the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis are the complement fixation test (CFT), serum agglutination test (SAT), Rose-Bengal test (RBT), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) and more recently the competitive ELISA (cELISA) and the fluorescent polarisation assay (FPA). Guidelines set by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) describe methods and diagnostic thresholds for each of these tests. Many countries have adopted these methods for the purposes of eradication of brucellosis and have legislated for the use of these tests (the CFT and SAT in particular) for the prevention of the spread of the disease through international trade. Within the European Union (EU) each member state has a National Reference Laboratory which regulates the quality of brucellosis diagnosis and works to the recommendations set by the OIE. This article describes the results from the first three EU ring trials assessing the harmonisation of diagnostic tests between each member state. The general level of harmony for SAT, CFT, and iELISA was found to be good, but issues of standardisation of the RBT, cELISA and FPA remain. The cELISA and FPA in particular need further work to create European harmony. The ring trials also proved successful at providing specific evidence of poor performance in some areas. The decision on whether or not to take action on the basis of these results rested with the individual laboratories concerned. The increase in the number of participants in these trials over time reflected the enlargement of the EU and increased the need for quality assurance.


Asunto(s)
Brucelosis Bovina/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/veterinaria , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/veterinaria , Animales , Bovinos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Unión Europea , Control de Calidad , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
J Immunol Methods ; 278(1-2): 171-8, 2003 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12957405

RESUMEN

The fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA) is a recently described test for the serological diagnosis of Brucella infection. It has many methodological advantages over older, more established tests and can be performed in a fraction of the time. To validate the FPA, serum samples from 146 confirmed (by culture) Brucella-infected cattle were tested in conjunction with serum samples from 1947 noninfected cattle. The competitive ELISA (cELISA) was validated using these positive reference samples and 1440 negative samples, while data for the indirect ELISA (iELISA) was generated from 6957 negative samples plus the positive sera. Published diagnostic specificity (DSp) data for the complement fixation test (CFT) and serum agglutination test (SAT) was used in conjunction with the test results on the positive sera to obtain diagnostic specificity plus diagnostic sensitivity (DSn). After selection of a cutoff for the FPA and cELISA, the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity total for each test were compared. The results, with 95% confidence intervals, were: FPA (195.7+/-2.79), iELISA (195.0+/-2.70), cELISA (194.9+/-3.48), CFT (191.7+/-4.45), and SAT (180.4+/-6.33). The data presented supports the use of the FPA in diagnosis of brucellosis and questions the use of the SAT and CFT for either screening or confirmatory testing.


Asunto(s)
Brucella abortus/inmunología , Brucelosis Bovina/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Inmunoensayo de Polarización Fluorescente/veterinaria , Pruebas de Aglutinación/veterinaria , Animales , Brucelosis Bovina/diagnóstico , Bovinos , Pruebas de Fijación del Complemento/veterinaria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Vet Rec ; 148(21): 657-61, 2001 May 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11400986

RESUMEN

Sera from 58 odontocetes taken in fisheries off Peru in 1993 to 1995 and from 24 cetaceans stranded along the Spanish coast of the Mediterranean in 1997 to 1999 were tested for the presence of Brucella species antibodies in competitive and indirect ELISAS (cELISA and iELISA). Among the animals from Peru, 21 of 27 (77.8 per cent) Lagenorhynchus obscurus, three of six Delphinus capensis, one of two inshore and two of three offshore Tursiops truncatus and five of 20 (25 per cent) Phocoena spinipinnis were positive in the cELISA. Brucella species antibodies were also observed in two of 16 (12.5 per cent) Stenella coeruleoalba and in one of two Ttruncatus from the Mediterranean. These data provide the first evidence for the presence of cetacean brucellae in the south Pacific Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Cetáceos , Animales , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/inmunología , Delfines , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Femenino , Explotaciones Pesqueras , Masculino , Región Mediterránea/epidemiología , Mar Mediterráneo , Océano Pacífico , Perú/epidemiología , Marsopas , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Ballenas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA