RESUMEN

Supracondylar humerus fractures are a common pediatric orthopedic injury requiring surgery. These patients are typically seen 4 weeks post-op for cast and pin removal followed by an 8-12-week post-op motion check. Our study aimed to limit the number of in-office visits by conducting this last motion check by telehealth. This was a single-surgeon series of consecutive surgically treated supracondylar humerus fractures. The primary outcome was the number of patients who completed their range of motion check remotely. Loss to follow-up at the telehealth visit was compared to a prior cohort for whom the range of motion visit was performed in person. Secondary outcomes included number of patients missing work/school for the in-person vs. telehealth visits and satisfaction with the in-person and telehealth visits. Twenty-two patients were enrolled during the study period. Sixteen (73%) successfully completed their telehealth follow-up, which was similar to the prior in-person cohort. Significantly more parents/children had to take a day off from work/school to attend the in-person visit. No patient required a subsequent in-person visit or referral to physical therapy. A total of 100% of patients reported excellent satisfaction with their telehealth visit. Overall satisfaction was similar comparing the in-person vs. telehealth visits (84% vs. 100% reporting excellent satisfaction, P  = 0.12). Telehealth is a viable option for the postoperative care of surgically treated supracondylar humerus fractures. This approach limits in-office visits and decreases the need for parents/children to miss work/school while maintaining excellent satisfaction scores.

Asunto(s)

Fracturas del Húmero , Ortopedia , Telemedicina , Niño , Humanos , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Húmero/cirugía

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is common, yet patient treatment expectations remain unclear. The primary purpose was to describe patient expectations before CTR. Secondarily, we aimed to identify factors influencing expectations. METHODS: Included patients underwent unilateral or bilateral CTR between 2015 and 2017 at a single academic center. Expectations regarding the level of relief/improvement were queried. Area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure social deprivation. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with expecting great relief/improvement. RESULTS: Of 307 included patients, mean age was 54 ± 16 years and 63% were women. Patients most commonly expected great (58%) or some (23%) relief/improvement. Few patients expected little (3%) or no (4%) relief/improvement, and 13% had no expectations. In the multivariable analysis, male sex, lower social deprivation, and lower BMI were associated with expecting great relief/improvement. Age, surgical technique (open versus endoscopic), use of the operating room versus procedure room, and preoperative factors (constant numbness, weakness/atrophy, duration of symptoms, and QuickDASH) were not associated with expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients expect some to great improvement after CTR. This was independent of several factors with a known association with worse outcomes (advanced age, atrophy/weakness, and constant numbness). Male sex was associated with the expectation of great improvement, in which superior outcomes relative to females have not been borne out in the literature. These findings highlight patient counseling opportunities. The observed association between social deprivation and expectations warrants further investigation, as the socioeconomically disadvantaged experience worse healthcare outcomes in general.