RESUMEN
Previous studies have shown that triptorelin gel (TG) given intravaginally in gel form is effective for advancing the time of ovulation in weaned sows. Three experiments were performed to determine the effects of altering the dose and timing of administration of intravaginal TG for advancing and synchronizing ovulation in weaned sows. In all experiments, estrus was detected twice or three times daily and ultrasound was performed to determine ovulation at 8-hour intervals. In experiment 1, sows (n = 131) received intravaginal gel containing 0 (Placebo), 25, 100, or 200 µg of TG at 96 hours after weaning and sows were inseminated on each day of standing estrus. Wean-to-estrus interval and duration of estrus were correlated (P < 0.0001) with estrus duration longer in TG (P < 0.05) compared with Placebo. More sows ovulated (P < 0.001) by 48 hours after treatment with 200 (81%), 100 (64%), and 25 µg (63%) of TG compared with Placebo (42%). The farrowing rate and total pigs born did not differ (P > 0.10). In experiment 2, sows (n = 126) received 200 µg of TG at 72, 84, or 96 hours after weaning or were untreated (Control-96). Sows receiving TG were inseminated once 24 to 28 hours after treatment. Control-96 sows were inseminated on each day of standing estrus. Wean-to-estrus interval was not affected by treatment, but wean-to-ovulation interval was reduced (P < 0.05) by TG-72 and TG-84 compared with TG-96 and Control-96. More sows ovulated 40 hours after treatment (P < 0.001) with TG-72 (56.5%) and TG-84 (32.2%) compared with TG-96 and Control-96 (13%) and for all TG treatments 48 hours after treatment (64%) compared with Control-96 (34%, P < 0.05). The farrowing rate was lower (P < 0.05) for sows assigned to TG-72 and TG-84 compared with TG-96 and Control-96, whereas the number of liveborn pigs did not differ (P > 0.10). In experiment 3, sows (n = 113) were assigned to receive no treatment (Control), intravaginal gel alone (Placebo), or 200 µg of TG given intravaginally (OvuGel) at 96 hours after weaning. Wean-to-estrus interval did not differ, but the duration of estrus tended (P < 0.10) to be reduced with OvuGel compared with the other treatments. More sows ovulated (P < 0.001) by 48 hours after OvuGel treatment (79.1%) compared with Control (46.4%) and Placebo (37.9%) and by 56 hours (P < 0.05). The farrowing rate and the number of liveborn pigs did not differ among treatments. The results of these studies indicate that 200 µg of TG given intravaginally at 96 hours after weaning (OvuGel) synchronizes ovulation and results in fertility similar to Controls.
Asunto(s)
Sincronización del Estro/métodos , Porcinos/fisiología , Pamoato de Triptorelina/farmacología , Administración Intravaginal , Animales , Estro/efectos de los fármacos , Detección del Estro , Femenino , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Inducción de la Ovulación/veterinaria , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Factores de Tiempo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Cremas, Espumas y Geles VaginalesRESUMEN
This study evaluated the effects of altering dose of PG600 on estrus and ovulation responses in prepubertal gilts and weaned sows. Experiment 1 tested the effects of one (1.0x, 400IU eCG+200IU hCG, n=74), one and a half (1.5x, n=82), or two (2.0x, n=71) doses of PG600 for prepubertal gilts. Estrus (58%) and ovulation (90%) were not affected (P>0.10) by dose. Higher doses increased (P<0.01) numbers of corpora lutea (17, 24, and 25), but not (P>0.10) the proportion of gilts with cysts (26, 36, and 46% for 1.0x, 1.5x, and 2.0x, respectively). Experiment 2 tested the effects of 0x (n=30), 0.5x (n=32), 1.0x (n=29), or 1.5x (n=30) doses of PG600 in weaned sows. Dose did not influence return to estrus (90%, P>0.10). There was an effect of dose (P<0.05) on incidence of cysts (3.4, 1.8, 6.4, and 29.8%, for 0x, 0.5x, 1.0x, and 1.5x doses, respectively). The 0.5x dose increased (P<0.01) farrowing rate (83.2%) compared to 0x (72.1%) and 1.5x (58.6%), but was not different from 1.0x (76.4%). Total pigs born (10.5+/-0.8) did not differ (P>0.10) among treatments. These data suggest that increasing dose of PG600 to 1.5x for gilts increases the number of corpora lutea but does not alter the proportion expressing estrus or ovulating. Reducing dose of PG600 for weaned sows did not alter estrus or ovulation, but the 0.5x dose increased farrowing rate compared to no PG600.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/administración & dosificación , Gonadotropinas Equinas/administración & dosificación , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Maduración Sexual , Animales , Cuerpo Lúteo/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Estro/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Folículo Ovárico/anatomía & histología , Folículo Ovárico/efectos de los fármacos , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Embarazo , Porcinos , DesteteRESUMEN
The administration of PG600 to sows at weaning induces >90% of sows to return to estrus within a week, but farrowing rate and litter size are often not improved. This study evaluated the effects of adjusted artificial insemination (AI) times based on weaning to estrus interval (WEI) and estrus to ovulation interval (EOI) following PG600. All sows were given PG600 at weaning and allotted to adjusted (ADJ, n=47) or non-adjusted (NA, n=46) mating times after the onset of estrus. Adjusted mating involved: (1) 2-3 days WEI, AI at 36 h and 48 h; (2) 4 days WEI, AI at 24h and 36 h; (3) 5 days WEI, AI at 12h and 24h; and (4) 6-7 days WEI, AI at 0 h and 12h. Mating for NA occurred at 0 h and 24h after onset of estrus. There was no effect of treatment on return to estrus (92.9% versus 92.5%) or ovulation (92.7% versus 92.5% for ADJ and NA, respectively). The proportion of first AI occurring within 24h prior to ovulation was increased (83.8% versus 50.0%) and closer to ovulation for ADJ compared to NA treatment (19.4h versus 27.3h, P<0.05). Treatment did not influence (P>0.10) the proportion of second AI occurring within 24h of ovulation (72.8% versus 56.6%) but did influence (P<0.05) the interval from second AI to ovulation for ADJ compared to NA (10.6h versus 3.3h). The ADJ treatment increased (P<0.05) the proportion of sows that received an AI within 24h before ovulation (98.8% versus 87.0%). However, treatment did not influence pregnancy (87.4%) or farrowing (79.5%) rates but the NA treatment tended to increase (P<0.10) total number of pigs born (11.8 versus 8.9). In conclusion, while AI times for ADJ appeared to occur within optimal periods, farrowing rates were not improved and litter size decreased, suggesting that two AI at 12h intervals and closer to the time of ovulation may be detrimental. Overall, these data suggest that for sows injected with PG600 at weaning and receiving two AI, breeding at 0 h and 24h after onset of estrus is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Cruzamiento/métodos , Gonadotropina Coriónica/farmacología , Estro/efectos de los fármacos , Gonadotropinas Equinas/farmacología , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Reproducción/fisiología , Porcinos/fisiología , Animales , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Inseminación Artificial/veterinaria , Tamaño de la Camada , Masculino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Distribución Aleatoria , Factores de Tiempo , DesteteRESUMEN
Boar exposure has been used for estrus induction of prepubertal gilts, but has limited effect on estrus synchronization within 7 d of introduction. In contrast, PG600 (400 IU of PMSG and 200 IU of hCG; Intervet, Millsboro, DE) is effective for induction of synchronized estrus, but the response is often variable. It is unknown whether boar exposure before PG600 administration might improve the efficiency of estrus induction of prepubertal gilts. In Exp. 1, physical or fence-line boar contact for 19 d was evaluated for inducing puberty in gilts before administration of i.m. PG600. Exp. 2 investigated whether 4-d boar exposure and gilt age influenced response to PG600. In Exp. 1, 150-d-old prepubertal gilts were randomly allotted to receive fence-line (n = 27, FBE) or physical (n = 29, PBE) boar exposure. Gilts were provided exposure to a mature boar for 30 min daily. All gilts received PG600 at 169 d of age. Estrous detection continued for 20 d after injection. In Exp. 2, prepubertal gilts were allotted by age group (160 or 180 d) to receive no boar exposure (NBE) or 4 d of fence-line boar exposure (BE) for 30 min daily before receiving PG600 either i.m. or s.c. Following PG600 administration, detection for estrus occurred twice-daily using fence-line boar exposure for 7 d. Results of Exp. 1 indicated no differences between FBE and PBE on estrus (77%), age at puberty (170 d), interval from PG600 to estrus (4 d), gilts ovulating (67%), or ovulation rate (12 corpora lutea, CL). Results from Exp. 2 indicated no effect of age group on estrus (55%) and days from PG600 to estrus (4 d). A greater (P < 0.05) proportion of BE gilts expressed estrus (65 vs. 47%), had a shorter (P < 0.05) interval from PG600 to estrus (3.6 vs. 4.3 d), and had decreased (P < 0.05) age at estrus (174 vs. 189 d) compared with NBE. Ovulation rate was greater (P < 0.05) in the BE group for the 180-d-old gilts (12.7 vs. 11.9 CL) compared with the NBE group. However, age group had no effect on ovulation (77%) or ovulation rate (12 CL). Collectively, these results indicate that physical boar contact may not be necessary when used in conjunction with PG600 to induce early puberty. The administration of PG600 to 180-d-old gilts in conjunction with 4 d prior fence-line boar exposure may improve induction of estrus, ovulation, and decrease age at puberty.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/farmacología , Estro/fisiología , Gonadotropinas Equinas/farmacología , Ovulación/fisiología , Maduración Sexual/fisiología , Porcinos/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Animales , Gonadotropina Coriónica/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Estro/efectos de los fármacos , Sincronización del Estro , Femenino , Gonadotropinas Equinas/administración & dosificación , Hormonas/administración & dosificación , Relaciones Interpersonales , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Masculino , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Distribución Aleatoria , Conducta Sexual Animal , Maduración Sexual/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Reproductive efficiency depends on detection of estrus, which may be influenced by housing and boar exposure. This experiment investigated the effects of housing system and boar contact on measures of estrus in weaned sows. Mixed-parity sows were randomly assigned to be weaned into gestation crates away from boars (AWC, n = 45), into pens away from boars (AWP, n = 42), or into pens adjacent to a mature boar (ADJ, n = 46). Estrus detection was initiated at approximately 0700 (0 h) and again at 0.25-, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 4-, and 8-h intervals beginning on d 4 and continuing through d 7 following weaning. Estrus detection involved observation of the standing response after application of nose-to-nose boar exposure, backpressure, and side rubbing. For the AWC sows, a mature boar was moved to the front of the crates for a 10-min period and then removed. Sows housed in AWP were moved approximately 15 m to an empty pen adjacent to a mature boar for a 10-min period, and then returned to their pen. Sows housed ADJ were not moved and estrus detection was performed in their home pen for a 10-min period. The proportion of sows expressing estrus within 7 d from weaning was lowest for ADJ (80%, 37/46) compared with AWP (98%, 41/42) and AWC (96%, 43/45; P < 0.05). There was an effect of interval from weaning to estrus on the percentage of sows expressing estrus, but there was no interaction with treatment. Sows in AWC and AWP (4.7 d) had decreased (P = 0.01) intervals from weaning to estrus compared with ADJ (5.2 d). The duration of estrus was also shorter (P < 0.001) for ADJ (45 h) compared with AWC (58 h) or AWP (62 h). There was a treatment x interval x day of estrus effect for the percentage of sows expressing estrus. After detection of the first standing response on the first day of estrus, only 62 to 82% of sows were detected standing over the next 2 h for all treatments. However, at 4 to 8 h, this increased to 85 to 98% for the AWC and AWP sows, but <73% of the ADJ sows were detected during this period. On the second day of estrus, estrus expression was not influenced by interval for the AWC and AWP sows and was between 90 to 100% during the 8-h period, whereas ADJ sow detection rates were between 68 to 88%. These data suggest that housing sows adjacent to boars negatively affects estrus expression and detection. In addition, refractory behavior occurs in approximately 30 to 40% of sows and is influenced by housing relative to the boar, day of estrus, and interval from last boar exposure.