Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Exp Brain Res ; 235(3): 777-785, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27878341

RESUMEN

With reference to theoretical models regarding links between emotions and actions, the present study examined whether the lateral occurrence of an emotional stimulus influences spatial and temporal parameters of gait initiation in 18 younger and 18 older healthy adults. In order to simulate road-crossing hazard for pedestrians, slides of approaching cars were used and they were presented in counterbalanced order with threatening slides from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) and control slides of safe walking areas. Each slide was presented on the left side of the participant once the first step was initiated. The results evidenced medio-lateral shifts to the left for the first step (right foot) and to the right for the second step (left foot). These shifts were both modulated by the slide contents in such a way that the resulting distance between the screen and the foot (right or left) was larger with the IAPS and traffic slides than with the control slides. The slides did not affect the base of support, step length, step velocity and time of double support. Advancing age influenced the subjective impact of the slides and gait characteristics, but did not modulate medio-lateral shifts. The data extend evidence of fast, emotional modulation of stepping, with theoretical and applied consequences.


Asunto(s)
Emociones , Marcha/fisiología , Peatones/psicología , Equilibrio Postural , Caminata/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Análisis de Varianza , Simulación por Computador , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estimulación Luminosa , Adulto Joven
4.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) ; 67(9): 1668-81, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24224565

RESUMEN

This study investigated the influence of pitch body tilt on judging the possibility of passing under high obstacles in the presence of an illusory horizontal self-motion. Seated subjects tilted at various body orientations were asked to estimate the possibility of passing under a projected bar (i.e., a parking barrier), while imagining a forward whole-body displacement normal to gravity. This task was performed under two visual conditions, providing either no visual surroundings or a translational horizontal optic flow that stopped just before the barrier appeared. The results showed a main overestimation of the possibility of passing under the bar in both cases and most importantly revealed a strong influence of body orientation despite the visual specification of horizontal self-motion by optic flow (i.e., both visual conditions yielded a comparable body tilt effect). Specifically, the subjective passability was proportionally deviated towards the body tilt by 46% of its magnitude when facing a horizontal optic flow and 43% without visual surroundings. This suggests that the egocentric attraction exerted by body tilt when referring the subjective passability to horizontal self-motion still persists even when anchoring horizontally related visual cues are displayed. These findings are discussed in terms of interaction between spatial references. The link between the reliability of available sensory inputs and the weight attributed to each reference is also addressed.


Asunto(s)
Señales (Psicología) , Orientación , Percepción Espacial/fisiología , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Estimulación Luminosa , Adulto Joven
5.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 138(1): 119-25, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21664588

RESUMEN

This study investigates the relative contribution of body parts in the elaboration of a whole-body egocentric attraction phenomenon previously observed during earth-based judgments. This was addressed through a particular earth-based task requiring estimating the possibility of passing under a projected line, imagining a forward horizontal displacement. Different postural configurations were tested, involving whole-body tilt, trunk tilt alone or head tilt alone. Two legs positions relative to the trunk were manipulated. Results showed systematic deviations of the subjective "passability" toward the tilt, linearly related to the tilt magnitude. For each postural configuration, the egocentric influence appeared to be highly dependent on the position of trunk and head axes, whereas the legs position appeared not relevant. When compared to the whole-body tilt condition, tilting the trunk alone consistently reduced the amount of the deviation toward the tilt, whereas tilting the head alone consistently increased it. Our results suggest that several specific effects from multiple body parts can account for the global deviation of the estimates observed during whole-body tilt. Most importantly, we support that the relative contribution of the body segments could mainly depend on a reweighting process, probably based on the reliability of sensory information available for a particular postural set.


Asunto(s)
Orientación/fisiología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Propiocepción/fisiología , Percepción Espacial/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Juicio/fisiología , Masculino
6.
Neurosci Lett ; 482(3): 193-7, 2010 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20647031

RESUMEN

We studied the effect of static pitch body tilts on the perception of self-motion direction induced by a visual stimulus. Subjects were seated in front of a screen on which was projected a 3D cluster of moving dots visually simulating a forward motion of the observer with upward or downward directional biases (relative to a true earth horizontal direction). The subjects were tilted at various angles relative to gravity and were asked to estimate the direction of the perceived motion (nose-up, as during take-off or nose-down, as during landing). The data showed that body orientation proportionally affected the amount of error in the reported perceived direction (by 40% of body tilt magnitude in a range of +/-20 degrees) and these errors were systematically recorded in the direction of body tilt. As a consequence, a same visual stimulus was differently interpreted depending on body orientation. While the subjects were required to perform the task in a geocentric reference frame (i.e., relative to a gravity-related direction), they were obviously influenced by egocentric references. These results suggest that the perception of self-motion is not elaborated within an exclusive reference frame (either egocentric or geocentric) but rather results from the combined influence of both.


Asunto(s)
Cinestesia/fisiología , Percepción/fisiología , Postura/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estimulación Luminosa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA