RESUMEN
Objective: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy (GE) with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: The 2004 AAN criteria was used to systematically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Results: Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. Recommendations: Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse-effect-related concerns, ethosuximide (ETS) or valproic acid (VPA) should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (Level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent FDA strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.
RESUMEN
Objective: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for managing treatment-resistant (TR) epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: 2004 criteria were used to systematically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Results: Forty-two articles were included. Recommendations: The following are established as effective to reduce seizure frequency (Level A): immediate-release pregabalin and perampanel for TR adult focal epilepsy (TRAFE); vigabatrin for TRAFE (not first-line treatment; rufinamide for Lennox-Gastuat syndrome (LGS) (add-on therapy). The following should be considered to decrease seizure frequency (Level B): lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, and extended-release topiramate for TRAFE (ezogabine production discontinued); immediate- and extended-release lamotrigine for generalized epilepsy with TR generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures in adults; levetiracetam (add-on therapy) for TR childhood focal epilepsy (TRCFE) (1 month to 16 years), TR GTC seizures, and TR juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; clobazam for LGS (add-on therapy); zonisamide for TRCFE (6-17 years); oxcarbazepine for TRCFE (1 month to 4 years). The text presents Level C recommendations. AED selection depends on seizure/syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, and AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. This evidence-based assessment informs AED prescription guidelines for TR epilepsy and indicates seizure types and syndromes needing more evidence. A recent FDA strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years of age and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: The 2004 AAN criteria were used to systematically review literature (January 2003-November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. RESULTS: Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. RECOMMENDATIONS: Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years of age with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse effect-related concerns, ethosuximide or valproic acid should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Tipo Ausencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology guideline for managing treatment-resistant (TR) epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: 2004 criteria were used to systemically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. RESULTS: Forty-two articles were included. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following are established as effective to reduce seizure frequency (Level A): immediate-release pregabalin and perampanel for TR adult focal epilepsy (TRAFE); vigabatrin for TRAFE (not first-line treatment); rufinamide for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) (add-on therapy). The following should be considered to decrease seizure frequency (Level B): lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, and extended-release topiramate for TRAFE (ezogabine production discontinued); immediate- and extended-release lamotrigine for generalized epilepsy with TR generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures in adults; levetiracetam (add-on therapy) for TR childhood focal epilepsy (TRCFE) (1 month-16 years), TR GTC seizures, and TR juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; clobazam for LGS (add-on therapy); zonisamide for TRCFE (6-17 years); oxcarbazepine for TRCFE (1 month-4 years). The text presents Level C recommendations. AED selection depends on seizure/syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, and AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. This evidence-based assessment informs AED prescription guidelines for TR epilepsy and indicates seizure types and syndromes needing more evidence. A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years of age and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos/efectos de los fármacos , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate lexical retrieval, presurgery and postsurgery, among children and adolescents who had undergone temporal lobe resection for intractable epilepsy and to compare outcomes in patients whose surgery involved the left temporal lobe or the right temporal lobe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 36 patients from a major pediatric epilepsy treatment center who had undergone temporal lobe resection (21 underwent left temporal lobe resection; 15 underwent right temporal lobe resection) for intractable epilepsy and who had completed neuropsychological testing that included a measure of confrontation naming (Boston Naming Test, BNT) and verbal fluency (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Fluency) prior to and after surgery. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to evaluate presurgery and postsurgery changes and to compare the left temporal lobe resection group with the right temporal lobe resection group. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Confrontation naming performance declined after left, but not right, temporal lobe resection (p<0.05). This effect was not documented for verbal fluency. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Left temporal lobe resection for intractable epilepsy is associated with a decline in lexical retrieval. The risk of decline in specific language functions following surgery involving the left temporal lobe should be incorporated in the counseling of patients and families in decision-making with regard to surgery.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Niño , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe epileptic encephalopathy that shares many features and characteristics of other treatment-resistant childhood epilepsies. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential to both prognosis and overall patient management. However, accurate diagnosis of LGS can be clinically challenging. This article summarizes key characteristics of LGS and areas of overlap with other childhood epilepsies. Drawing upon input from a committee of established LGS experts convened in June 2012 in Chicago, Illinois, the authors highlight key diagnostic tests for making the differential diagnosis and propose a diagnostic scheme for people with suspected LGS.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Diferencial , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Consenso , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemispherectomy is a surgical procedure used to treat medically intractable epilepsy in children with severe unilateral cortical disease secondary to acquired brain or congenital lesions. The major surgical approaches for hemispherectomy are anatomic hemispherectomy, traditional functional hemispherectomy, and peri-insular hemispherotomy. We describe the epilepsy outcome, including the need for reoperation, after hemispherectomy in patients with brain malformations or acquired brain lesions who underwent hemispherectomy for refractory epilepsy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at Children's Hospital Boston. Cases were ascertained from a research database of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from 1997 to 2011. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and office charts. Outcome after surgery was defined as improvement in seizures (quantity and severity) represented by the Engel classification score measured at last follow-up, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The need for reoperation for completion of hemispheric disconnection. We also examined whether placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunt was required after hemispherectomy was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients who underwent hemispherectomy for severe, medically intractable epilepsy. Group 1 (n = 14) had static acquired lesions, and group 2 (n = 22) had malformations of cortical development. Mean age at surgery for group 1 was 9 years (S.D. 5.5) and 2.77 years for group 2 (S.D. 4.01; P < 0.001). The seizure outcome was good in both groups (Engel score I for 25, II for three, III for six, and IV for two patients) and did not differ between the two groups. In group 1, five patients underwent anatomic hemispherectomy (one had prior focal resection), four underwent functional hemispherectomy, and five underwent peri-insular hemispherotomy; none required a second procedure. In group 2, a total of 14 patients had anatomic hemispherectomy (of these, three had had limited prior focal resection), five had functional hemispherectomy, and three had peri-insular hemispherotomy. Among the patients in group 2 who had had functional hemispherectomy, one required reoperation to complete the disconnection and one required peri-insular hemispherotomy because of persistent seizures. In group 1, three patients underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and from these patients two underwent anatomic hemispherectomy and one had functional hemispherectomy. In group 2, 12 patients had ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and all of them had anatomic hemispherectomy as a first or second procedure. CONCLUSION: Seizure outcome after hemispherectomy is good in patients with acquired lesions and with developmental malformations. Although the seizure outcome was similar in the three procedures, the complication rate was higher with anatomic hemispherectomy than with the more recent functional hemispherectomy and peri-insular hemispherotomy. The group with cortical malformations generally had surgery at a younger age; two patients with malformations of cortical development who underwent functional hemispherectomy required second surgeries. The need for reoperation in these cases may reflect the anatomic complexity of developmental hemispheric malformations, which may lead to incomplete disconnection.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/cirugía , Epilepsia/cirugía , Hemisferectomía/métodos , Encéfalo/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Epilepsia/etiología , Epilepsia/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Lateralidad Funcional , Humanos , Lactante , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Malformaciones del Desarrollo Cortical/complicaciones , Malformaciones del Desarrollo Cortical/patología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Derivación VentriculoperitonealRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Reports of studies evaluating rufinamide as an add-on therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy are restricted to a few publications. Prospective multicenter studies including children and adults have yielded important information about several types of epilepsies and syndromes. We evaluated the use of rufinamide in a single pediatric center with a large cohort and long-term follow-up period. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients taking rufinamide from November 2008 to March 2013. Response was defined by a seizure reduction of ≥50% compared to baseline. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with a median age of 9.1 years (range 0.4-29.6 years) were reviewed. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 1-37 months). Epilepsy etiology was classified as genetic (23.7%), structural/metabolic (41%), and unknown cause (35.3%). Overall, rufinamide treatment led to a median seizure frequency reduction of 59.2% from responders to baseline. Seizure reduction was greater in patients with genetic etiology compared to structural/metabolic (66.2% vs. 45.5% responders, p = 0.005). Rufinamide was discontinued in 110 (36.7%) of 300 patients: 63 (21%) due to unsatisfactory response, 47 (15.7%) due to side effects, and in 18 (6%) of those due to both. Most common adverse effects were sleepiness, vomiting, mood changes, nausea, and loss of appetite. Median time to loss of efficacy was 11.6 months (range 3-28 months). SIGNIFICANCE: Rufinamide provides satisfactory seizure reduction as an adjunctive treatment in refractory epilepsy. Results need to be interpreted in the setting of data acquisition, including inherent biases of retrospective studies. Patients with a known genetic etiology may have better responses than patients with structural/metabolic etiology.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Cooperación del Paciente , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
To retrospectively examine response to stimulant treatment in patients with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms as predicted by seizure freedom for six months, use of methylphenidate (MPH) versus amphetamine (AMP) preparations, cognitive level, and medical records were searched for patients under the age of 18 with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms treated with MPH or AMP (n=36, age=10.4 ± 3.5; male=67%). "Responders" had a CGI-improvement score of ≤ 2 and did not stop medication because of adverse effects. "Worsened" patients discontinued medication because of agitation/emotional lability. Seizure freedom did not predict treatment response. Lower cognitive level was associated with increased rate of worsening (p=0.048). No patients who were seizure-free at the start of the medication trial experienced an increase in seizures. Of the patients having seizures at the start of trial, one patient on MPH and two patients on AMP had increased seizures during the trial. Seizures returned to baseline frequency or less after stimulant discontinuation or anticonvulsant adjustment. Methylphenidate was associated with a higher response rate, with 12 of 19 given MPH (0.62 ± 0.28 mg/kg/day) compared with 4 of 17 given AMP (0.37 ± 0.26 mg/kg/day) responding (p=0.03). Methylphenidate treatment and higher cognitive level were associated with improved treatment outcome, while seizure freedom had no clear effect. Confidence in these findings is limited by the study's small, open-label, and uncontrolled design.
Asunto(s)
Anfetamina/uso terapéutico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Metilfenidato/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/complicaciones , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Niño , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clobazam has been used in clinical practice as an adjunctive treatment for diverse seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of clobazam in a large sample of patients with refractory epilepsy at a tertiary pediatric center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with clobazam between January 2001 and July 2013 who had a follow-up visit at least one month after starting clobazam. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline seizure frequency during the 3 months before the introduction of clobazam. We examined the relationship between dose range and response rate. RESULTS: Four-hundred twenty-five patients were prescribed clobazam, of whom 300 (median age 9.1 years, interquartile range 4.7-13.3 years) had follow-up data greater than 1 month. Median follow-up was 5 months (interquartile range 3-11 months). Response to treatment with clobazam was observed in 203 of 300 (67.7%) patients, of whom 84 (28%) became seizure-free. The median starting dose was 0.2 (interquartile range 0.13-0.33) mg/kg/day with a target dose of 0.48 (0.26-0.80) mg/kg/day. Twenty-seven (9%) patients discontinued clobazam, 16 (59.3%) because adverse effects, 10 (37%) because of a lack of efficacy, and one (3.7%) because of a combination of adverse effects and lack of efficacy. The most common adverse effects were tiredness in 44 of 300 (14.6%) and mood or behavioral changes in 23 (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Clobazam is a well-tolerated antiepileptic drug with good response rates in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Clobazam , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Epilepsia/clasificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between spike propagation represented by spatiotemporal source analysis of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) spikes and surgical outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were divided into mesial (n=27) and non-mesial (n=10) groups based on the presurgical evaluation. In each patient, ten ipsilateral spikes were averaged, and spatiotemporal source maps of the averaged spike were obtained by using minimum norm estimate. Regions of interest (ROIs) were created including temporoparietal, inferior frontal, mesial temporal, anterior and posterior part of the lateral temporal cortex. We extracted activation values from the source maps and the threshold was set at half of the maximum activation at the peak latency. The leading and propagated areas of the spike were defined as those ROIs with activation reaching the threshold at the earliest and at the peak latencies, respectively. Surgical outcome was assessed based on Engel's classification. Binary variables were created from leading areas (restricted to the anterior and mesial temporal ROIs or not) and from propagation areas (involving the temporoparietal ROI or not), and for surgical outcome (Class I or not). Fisher's exact test was used for significance testing. RESULTS: In total and mesial group, restricted anterior/mesial temporal leading areas were correlated with Class I (p<0.05). Temporoparietal propagation was correlated with Class II-IV (p<0.05). For the non-mesial group, no significant relation was found. CONCLUSIONS: Spike propagation patterns represented by spatiotemporal source analysis of MEG spikes may provide useful information for prognostic implication in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Magnetoencefalografía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This chapter covers the main steps involved in the initiation of antiepileptic drug therapy. Aspects covered specifically include the decision whether or not to initiate treatment, the selection process of a drug of first choice for a given patient with a particular seizure type or epilepsy syndrome, and the process of initiating therapy with the selected drug of first choice. Suggested choices of antiepileptic drugs by seizure type or epilepsy syndrome are summarized in a table. In an appendix, these drugs are reviewed individually with regard to their clinical use. The emphasis is on initial dose, dosage escalation, common and serious adverse effects, baseline evaluation, monitoring of therapy, and relevant drug interactions.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/clasificación , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Interacciones Farmacológicas , HumanosRESUMEN
The purpose of this report was to update the 2006 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) report and identify the level of evidence for long-term efficacy or effectiveness for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. All applicable articles from July 2005 until March 2012 were identified, evaluated, and combined with the previous analysis (Glauser et al., 2006) to provide a comprehensive update. The prior analysis methodology was utilized with three modifications: (1) the detectable noninferiority boundary approach was dropped and both failed superiority studies and prespecified noninferiority studies were analyzed using a noninferiority approach, (2) the definition of an adequate comparator was clarified and now includes an absolute minimum point estimate for efficacy/effectiveness, and (3) the relationship table between clinical trial ratings, level of evidence, and conclusions no longer includes a recommendation column to reinforce that this review of efficacy/evidence for specific seizure types does not imply treatment recommendations. This evidence review contains one clarification: The commission has determined that class I superiority studies can be designed to detect up to a 20% absolute (rather than relative) difference in the point estimate of efficacy/effectiveness between study treatment and comparator using an intent-to-treat analysis. Since July, 2005, three class I randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 class III RCTs have been published. The combined analysis (1940-2012) now includes a total of 64 RCTs (7 with class I evidence, 2 with class II evidence) and 11 meta-analyses. New efficacy/effectiveness findings include the following: levetiracetam and zonisamide have level A evidence in adults with partial onset seizures and both ethosuximide and valproic acid have level A evidence in children with childhood absence epilepsy. There are no major changes in the level of evidence for any other subgroup. Levetiracetam and zonisamide join carbamazepine and phenytoin with level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for adults with partial onset seizures. Although ethosuximide and valproic acid now have level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for children with absence seizures, there continues to be an alarming lack of well designed, properly conducted epilepsy RCTs for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and in children in general. These findings reinforce the need for multicenter, multinational efforts to design, conduct, and analyze future clinically relevant adequately designed RCTs. When selecting a patient's AED, all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/clasificación , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/clasificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Síndrome , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Retrospective review was performed of children aged <3 years with epileptic spasms at our center from 2004-2010. Short-term (<6 months) and long-term (≥6 months) outcomes were assessed. We included 173 children (104 boys; median age of onset, 6.8 months) with epileptic spasms of known (62%) and unknown (38%) etiology. Treatments included adrenocorticotropic hormone (n = 103), vigabatrin (n = 82), phenobarbital (n = 34), and other agents (n = 121). Short-term treatment with adrenocorticotropic hormone and vigabatrin provided better epileptic spasm control in groups with known and unknown etiology than other agents. At follow-up (6-27 months), 54% of children manifested seizures, and 83% manifested developmental delay. Known etiology was a predictor of poor developmental outcome (P = 0.006), whereas bilateral/diffuse brain lesions predicted both poor development and seizures (P = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). Initial presentations of epileptic spasms with hypotonia or developmental delay most strongly predicted both seizures and neurodevelopmental outcomes (P < 0.001). In a child presenting with epileptic spasms with developmental delay or hypotonia, no specific treatment may offer superior benefit.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Espasmos Infantiles/tratamiento farmacológico , Espasmos Infantiles/epidemiología , Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/uso terapéutico , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Fenobarbital/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vigabatrin/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Hemimegalencephaly (HMG) is a developmental brain disorder characterized by an enlarged, malformed cerebral hemisphere, typically causing epilepsy that requires surgical resection. We studied resected HMG tissue to test whether the condition might reflect somatic mutations affecting genes critical to brain development. We found that two out of eight HMG samples showed trisomy of chromosome 1q, which encompasses many genes, including AKT3, a gene known to regulate brain size. A third case showed a known activating mutation in AKT3 (c.49GâA, creating p.E17K) that was not present in the patient's blood cells. Remarkably, the E17K mutation in AKT3 is exactly paralogous to E17K mutations in AKT1 and AKT2 recently discovered in somatic overgrowth syndromes. We show that AKT3 is the most abundant AKT paralog in the brain during neurogenesis and that phosphorylated AKT is abundant in cortical progenitor cells. Our data suggest that somatic mutations limited to the brain could represent an important cause of complex neurogenetic disease.
Asunto(s)
Cerebro/anomalías , Cromosomas Humanos Par 1/genética , Malformaciones del Desarrollo Cortical/genética , Neurogénesis/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Trisomía/genética , Cerebro/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cerebro/patología , Epilepsia/etiología , Epilepsia/patología , Epilepsia/cirugía , Humanos , Malformaciones del Desarrollo Cortical/complicaciones , Malformaciones del Desarrollo Cortical/patologíaRESUMEN
Hypothalamic hamartomas present with isolated fits of ictal laughter (gelastic epilepsy) or a combination of gelastic and other types of seizures. Many of these patients also suffer from cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric comorbidities and precocious puberty. Although there is a large body of anecdotal evidence about hypothalamic hamartomas and gelastic seizures, many questions still remain to be answered. For instance, which specific hypothalamic regions are most affected by the location of hamartomas causing laughing versus other types of seizures? Does the neuroanatomical localization of the lesions differ in cases with only gelastic seizures or a combination of gelastic and other types of seizures? Does the location of the lesions correlate with the presence of precocious puberty, and does the type of lesion influence the severity or the type of seizures? In a retrospective review of clinical and structural neuroimaging data from 100 cases of gelastic epilepsy and hypothalamic hamartoma, we aimed to address these questions by analysing the clinical presentation and the neuroanatomical features of the hypothalamic lesions in these patients. Our findings suggest that in all 100 cases, lesions were centred at the level of the mammillary bodies in the posterior hypothalamus. Compared with the patients with pure gelastic seizures (n = 32), those with gelastic and other types of seizures (n = 68) had significantly longer duration of epilepsy (P < 0.001), whereas age of seizure onset, the volume of lesions and the proximity to the mammillary bodies were not different between the two groups. In contrast, patients with cognitive or developmental impairment and those with precocious puberty had significantly larger lesions involving the anterior and posterior hypothalamus.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsias Parciales/patología , Hamartoma/patología , Enfermedades Hipotalámicas/patología , Hipotálamo/patología , Risa , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Epilepsias Parciales/etiología , Femenino , Hamartoma/complicaciones , Humanos , Enfermedades Hipotalámicas/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Tubérculos Mamilares/patologíaAsunto(s)
Epilepsias Parciales/diagnóstico , Espasmo Hemifacial/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsias Parciales/complicaciones , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Femenino , Espasmo Hemifacial/etiología , Espasmo Hemifacial/fisiopatología , Humanos , Convulsiones/complicaciones , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
We report our pediatric experience with lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy in patients more than 17 years old. We retrospectively reviewed charts for lacosamide use and seizure frequency outcome in patients with focal epilepsy (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Sixteen patients (7 boys) were identified (median dose 275 mg daily, 4.7 mg/kg daily; mean age 14.9 years, range 8-21 years). Patients were receiving a median of 2 antiepileptic drugs (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7-3) in addition to having undergone previous epilepsy surgery (n=3), vagus nerve stimulation (n=9), and ketogenic diet (n=3). Causes included structural (encephalomalacia and diffuse encephalitis, 1 each; stroke in 2) and genetic abnormalities (Aarskog and Rett syndromes, 1 each) or cause not known (n=10). Median seizure frequency at baseline was 57 per month (IQR 7-75), and after a median follow-up of 4 months (range 1-13 months) of receiving lacosamide, it was 12.5 per month (IQR 3-75), (P<0.01). Six patients (37.5%; 3 seizure free) were classified as having disease that responded to therapy (≥50% reduction seizure frequency) and 10 as having disease that did not respond to therapy (<50% in 3; increase in 1; unchanged in 6). Adverse events (tics, behavioral disturbance, seizure worsening, and depression with suicidal ideation in 1 patient each) prompted lacosamide discontinuation in 4/16 (25%). This retrospective study of 16 children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy demonstrated good response to adjunctive lacosamide therapy (median seizure reduction of 39.6%; 37.5% with ≥50% seizure reduction) without severe adverse events.