Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports ; 44: 100906, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652625

RESUMEN

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) caused by Leishmania (L.) infantum and L. major, respectively, are endemic in Tunisia. The aim of the study was to assess canine Leishmania spp. infection prevalence as well as to identify the Leishmania species involved in two well-documented and geographically distinct VL and ZCL foci. One hundred seventy-six dogs were randomly recruited in the VL focus of Sbikha-Zaghouan (n = 100) and the ZCL focus of Echrarda-Nasrallah (n = 76). Physical examination and blood collection were systemically performed. Needle aspiration was done in case of lymph node (LN) enlargement. All sera were tested by ELISA. kDNA RT-PCR was performed on DNA extracts from (i) buffy coats of seropositive dogs and (ii) LN aspirates. Leishmania species identification was done by ITS1 PCR-sequencing. Thirty-three dogs (18.8%) were infected by Leishmania; 30 having anti-Leishmania antibodies and 3 were seronegative dogs with Leishmania DNA in LN aspirates. Prevalence of infection was significantly higher in VL foci than in ZCL foci (27% versus 7.9%, p = 0.002). Leishmania species was identified in 11 dogs and corresponded to L. infantum. Combination of serology and qPCR on LN aspirates seems to be the best option for canine leishmaniasis diagnosis. Infection is more frequent in VL foci and L. infantum is the only identified species.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Leishmania , Leishmaniasis Cutánea , Leishmaniasis Visceral , Perros , Animales , Túnez/epidemiología , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/epidemiología , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/veterinaria , Leishmania/genética , Leishmaniasis Visceral/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Visceral/epidemiología , Leishmaniasis Visceral/veterinaria , ADN de Cinetoplasto , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología
2.
Tunis Med ; 93(11): 687-91, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27126425

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of intestinal parasitosis is very different according to countries. Therefore, it is always interesting to update the data in Tunisia to better direct control measures. AIM: The objectives of this survey were to estimate the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis in the region of Tunis, to study their evolution and to establish various combinations of intestinal protozoa. METHODS: This is a retrospective study carried out over a period of 17 years from 1996 at 2012 and which involved 20033 individuals. Each subject had one or more stool examination which included a direct microscopic examination and a concentration by modified Ritchie technique. RESULTS: The prevalence of intestinal parasitosis was 12.55%. Entamoeba histolytica/dispar and Giardia intestinalis accounted respectively a prevalence of 0.51% and 1.48%. Hymenolepis nana was the most predominant helminth with a prevalence rate of 0.53%, followed by Enterobius vermicularis (0.21%). Two cases of Hookworms and seven cases of Strongyloides stercoralis were diagnosed. Polyparasitism concerned 16.59% of infected individuals. Significant combinations occured mainly for amoeba in particular Entamoeba histolytica/dispar and Entamoeba coli (r=0.232). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the decrease of the prevalence of giardiasis and amebiasis, whereas helminthiases with direct transmission remain frequent.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA