RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is little consensus regarding the spontaneous uprighting of the mandibular dentoalveolar complex in response to maxillary expansion, which poses the question about the necessity of combining mandibular treatment with rapid maxillary expansion to coordinate the maxilla and mandible transversely. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the bonded rapid maxillary expander (RME) alone compared with RME with lip bumper (LB) treatment on the mandibular transverse changes. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 3 groups: the control group with no orthodontic or orthopedic treatment (23 patients [14 females, 9 males]; mean age 9.13 years at T1 and 11.24 years at T2); the RME group with no mandibular treatment (22 patients [9 females, 13 males]; mean age 8.73 years at T1 and 12.04 years at T2); and RME + LB group (23 patients [16 females, 7 males]; mean age 9.45 years at T1 and 12.18 years at T2). Three-dimensional superimposition of the mandibular images was performed with cone-beam computed tomography taken at prephase and postphase I treatment (growth and development check records for the control group) to conduct the angular and linear measurements at the dental, alveolar, and skeletal levels. The intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Accompanying slight molar self-uprighting during the normal mandibular growth period observed in the control group, transverse growth was also observed in both alveolar and basal bone levels of the mandible, but no significant changes in the alveolar bone inclination occurred. The bonded RME slightly increased the mandibular first molar uprighting but not the mandibular widths at the tooth or alveolar levels. Adding a LB significantly increased the intermolar width and molar uprighting while decreasing the alveolar bone inclination but did not increase the amount of mandibular transverse growth at the bone level. CONCLUSIONS: RME alone did not significantly increase the transverse dimension of the mandible. RME + LB significantly increased mandibular intermolar width, uprighted the mandibular molars, and reduced the alveolar bone inclination.

Asunto(s)

Labio , Maxilar , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Técnica de Expansión Palatina , Mandíbula

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) may undergo unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) before skeletal maturity in an effort to improve facial symmetry. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis's effect on airway volumes have been studied in the past, though to our knowledge, none have accounted for the effect of head and neck posture on airway morphology. This study aimed to tackle this shortcoming, using imaging to analyze the upper airway of patients with HFM before and after surgical intervention with MDO. METHODS/DESCRIPTION: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients with a diagnosis of unilateral HFM whom underwent unilateral MDO with an oblique vector at age 4 to 14 years at a single institution from 2004 to 2019. Patients with pre- and post-MDO three-dimensional computed tomography scans of the upper airway within 12 months of distractor placement and removal, respectively, were included. Head and neck postures were determined by craniocervical, pitch, roll, and yaw angles. Pre- and post-operative pharyngeal airway volumes, pharyngeal surface area, minimum retropalatal cross-sectional areas (RP CSA) and retroglossal (RG) CSA and associated anteroposterior distances were measured using Mimics 22.0 (Materialise; Leuven, Belgium). Comparison was done using Kruskal-Wallis tests and linear mixed-effects models controlling for head and neck postures. RESULTS: Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at pre-distractor placement computed tomography scan was 99 ±â€Š35 months, and mean duration between pre- and post-surgery scans was 220 ±â€Š90 days. Head and neck posture were found to be significant predictors of all airway dimensions. After controlling for significant factors with fixed effects linear modeling, surface area was found to be significantly smaller in patients after MDO by 189.48 mm2 (F[10.8] = -3.47, P = 0.0053), compared to their preoperative measurements. Surgery was not a significant predictor of changes in airway volume (F[11.6] = 0.52, P = 0.61), minimum RP CSA (F[12.2] =  -0.64, P = 0.53), minimum RG CSA (F[12.6] =  -1.64, P = 0.13), RP anteroposterior distance (F[14.0] = 0.30, P = 0.77), or RG anteroposterior distance (F[20.0] =  -0.04, P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Oblique vector MDO in patients with HFM is associated only with statistically significant changes in the surface area of the upper airway, and is not associated with statistically significant changes in dimensions like volume, CSA, or anteroposterior dimension. This is an important finding, as it may guide discussions surrounding risk/benefit ratio for MDO in childhood.

Asunto(s)

Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas , Síndrome de Goldenhar , Osteogénesis por Distracción , Síndrome de Pierre Robin , Adolescente , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Síndrome de Goldenhar/complicaciones , Síndrome de Goldenhar/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Goldenhar/cirugía , Humanos , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/cirugía , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Síndrome de Pierre Robin/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento

Asunto(s)

Implantación Dental Endoósea , Implantes Dentales , Trasplante Óseo , Tejido Conectivo/trasplante , Humanos , Fenotipo