Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 144(3): 315-327, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954828

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between prophylactic radiologic interventions and perioperative blood loss during cesarean delivery in women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: On January 3, 2023, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We also checked ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively. Prophylactic radiologic interventions to reduce bleeding during cesarean delivery involved preoperative placement of balloon catheters, distal (internal or common iliac arteries) or proximal (abdominal aorta), or sheaths (uterine arteries). The primary outcome was volume of blood loss; secondary outcomes were the number of red blood cell units transfused and adverse events. Studies including women who received an emergency cesarean delivery were excluded. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two authors independently screened citations for relevance, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of individual studies with the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. TABULTATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: From a total of 1,332 screened studies, 50 were included in the final analysis, comprising 5,962 women. These studies consisted of two randomized controlled trials and 48 observational studies. Thirty studies compared distal balloon occlusion with a control group, with a mean difference in blood loss of -406 mL (95% CI, -645 to -167). Fourteen studies compared proximal balloon occlusion with a control group, with a mean difference of -1,041 mL (95% CI, -1,371 to -710). Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with serious or critical risk of bias provided similar results. Five studies compared uterine artery embolization with a control group, all with serious or critical risk of bias; the mean difference was -936 mL (95% CI, -1,522 to -350). Reported information on adverse events was limited. CONCLUSION: Although the predominance of observational studies in the included literature warrants caution in interpreting the findings of this meta-analysis, our findings suggest that prophylactic placement of balloon catheters or sheaths before planned cesarean delivery in women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder may, in some cases, substantially reduce perioperative blood loss. Further study is required to quantify the efficacy according to various severities of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and the associated safety of these radiologic interventions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022320922.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Cesárea , Placenta Accreta , Hemorragia Posparto , Humanos , Femenino , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Embarazo , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/métodos , Metaanálisis en Red
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(2): 2251076, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37673791

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between prophylactic radiologic interventions and perioperative blood loss in women with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study of women with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum disorder who underwent planned cesarean section in 69 Dutch hospitals between 2008 and 2013. All women had two risk factors for PAS: placenta previa/anterior low-lying placenta and a history of cesarean section(s). Women with and without ultrasonographic signs of PAS were studied as two separate groups. We compared the total blood loss of women with prophylactic radiologic interventions, defined as preoperative placement of balloon catheters or sheaths in the internal iliac or uterine arteries, with that of a control group consisting of women without prophylactic radiologic interventions using multivariable regression. We evaluated maternal morbidity by the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused within 24 h following childbirth (categories: 0, 1-3, >4), duration of hospital admission, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: A total of 350 women with placenta previa/anterior low-lying placenta and history of cesarean section(s) were included: 289 with normal ultrasonography, of whom 21 received prophylactic radiologic intervention, and 61 had abnormal ultrasonography, of whom 22 received prophylactic intervention. Among women with normal ultrasonography without prophylactic intervention (n = 268), the median blood loss was 725 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 500-1500) vs. 1000 mL (IQR 550-1750) in women with intervention (n = 21); the adjusted difference in blood loss was 9 mL (95% confidence interval (CI) -315-513), p = .97). Among women with abnormal ultrasonography, those without prophylactic intervention (n = 39) had a median blood loss of 2500 mL (IQR 1200-5000) vs. 1750 mL (IQR 775-4000) in women with intervention (n = 22); the adjusted difference in blood loss was -1141 mL (95% CI -1694- -219, p = .02). Results of outcomes on maternal morbidity were comparable among women with and without prophylactic intervention. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that prophylactic radiologic interventions prior to planned cesarean section may help to limit perioperative blood loss in women with clear signs of placenta accreta spectrum disorder on ultrasonography, but there was no evidence of a difference within the subgroup without such ultrasonographic signs. The use of these interventions should be discussed in a multidisciplinary shared decision-making process, including discussions of potential benefits and possible complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/28238, identifier NL4210 (NTR4363).


Asunto(s)
Placenta Accreta , Placenta Previa , Hemorragia Posparto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Placenta Accreta/diagnóstico por imagen , Placenta Accreta/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Nucl Med Commun ; 37(5): 461-5, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26671851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) metastasize to the liver, lymph nodes and, although less frequently, to the bone. The heart is a rare localization for NET metastases. METHODS: With the introduction of the Ga-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography (CT) in our hospital as a new diagnostic method for imaging neuroendocrine tumours, more rare metastatic localizations are being found. We present six cases of patients with cardiac NET metastases detected by Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Also, a review of literature is presented on case reports of cardiac NET metastases in patients detected by somatostatin receptor imaging, including In-Pentetreotide single photon emission computed tomography/CT, Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT or Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Most patients with cardiac NET metastases have extensive metastatic disease. The cardiac metastases are often asymptomatic.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cardíacas/secundario , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cardíacas/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Compuestos Organometálicos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA