RESUMEN
Tecnologia: Detecção do antígeno galactomanana no soro. Contexto: A aspergilose pulmonar invasiva (API) é uma infecção fúngica oportunista de grande risco para pacientes imunocomprometidos. A detecção do antígeno galactomanana no soro por meio de um imunoensaio (ELISA) pode ser um teste não invasivo que auxilie no diagnóstico precoce da doença nestes pacientes. Objetivo: Avaliar a acurácia da detecção do antígeno galactomana no soro para o diagnóstico precoce de aspergilose pulmonar invasiva. Métodos: Revisão rápida sistematizada sobre acurácia de diagnóstico. As bases de dados utilizadas na pesquisa foram: PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, BVS e Cochrane Library. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos estudos incluídos foi realizada por meio da ferramenta AMSTAR-2. Resultados: Foram selecionadas três revisões sistemáticas que atendiam aos critérios de elegibilidade com as quais foi realizada uma análise descritiva dos dados encontrados. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica demonstrou que duas das revisões sistemáticas (RS) apresentaram qualidade criticamente baixa e uma das RS apresentou qualidade alta. Conclusão: A detecção da galactomanana sérica por ELISA pode ser um teste auxiliar no diagnóstico de API, entretanto, possui várias limitações e deve ser utilizado juntamente com outros critérios diagnósticos do consenso do EORTC/MSG. Novas pesquisas devem ser fomentadas para avaliar a utilização do teste no tempo do diagnóstico e no monitoramento da API
Technology: Detection of galactomannan antigen in serum. Background: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is an opportunistic fungal infection of serious risk for immunocompromised patients. Detection of galactomannan antigen in serum by immunoassay (ELISA) could be a noninvasive test that contributes to the early diagnosis of the disease in this group of patients. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of serum galactomannan antigen detection for the early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Methods: Rapid review of diagnostic accuracy. Databases used in the search were: PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, BVS, and Cochrane Library. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Results: Three systematic reviews that satisfied the eligibility criteria were selected, and a descriptive analysis of the data found was performed. The methodological quality assessment showed that two of the systematic reviews (SR) presented critically low quality, and one of the SR presented high quality. Conclusion: Detection of serum galactomannan by ELISA may be a valuable test for diagnosing IPA; however, it has a series of limitations and should be used in conjunction with other diagnostic criteria of the EORTC/MSG consensus. Further research should be encouraged to evaluate the use of this assay, considering the time to diagnosis and IPA monitoring
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Antígenos , Precisión de la Medición Dimensional , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Uso de canabidiol (CDB) medicinal presente no óleo de canabis. Indicação: Tratamento de crianças portadoras de epilepsia refratária resistente a medicação e síndromes graves decorrentes. Pergunta: O uso do canabidiol em crianças com epilepsia resistente a medicamentos apresentaria diminuição na frequência de crises convulsivas? Objetivo: Investigar a eficácia e a segurança do canabidiol, em comparação a placebo, na manutenção da remissão em crianças com epilepsia refratária. Métodos: Revisão rápida de revisões sistemáticas, por meio de buscas bibliográficas realizadas nas bases PUBMED, SCOPUS, BVS, Cochrane Library. Foram utilizadas estratégias de buscas com vocabulário padronizado e avaliação da qualidade metodológica usando o checklist AMSTAR 2. Resultados: Foram selecionadas duas revisões sistemáticas que atendiam aos critérios de elegibilidade. O CDB quando comparado ao placebo reduziu 50% das convulsões para epilepsia refrataria (RR 1.69 [1.20 2.36]), para a síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut o RR foi 2.98 (IC 95%, 1.83 - 4.85) e para a síndrome de Dravet o RR foi 2.26 (IC 95% ,1.38 - 3.70). O CDB pode resultar em uma diminuição no apetite em dosagens maiores (RR = 2,10, IC 95% [0,964,62], embora não apresente diferença de efeito dos grupos comparadores. Conclusão: Duas revisões sistemáticas recentes o CDB quando comparado ao placebo reduziu 50% das convulsões para epilepsia refrataria e síndromes graves. Entretanto, existem poucos ensaios clínicos publicados na área
: Use of cannabidiol (CBD) present in cannabis oil. Indication: Treatment of children with drug-resistant refractory epilepsy and severe syndromes resulting. Question: Would the use of cannabidiol in children with drug-resistant epilepsy lead to a decrease in seizure frequency? Objective: to investigate the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol, compared to placebos, in maintaining remission in children with refractory epilepsy. Methods: Rapid review of systematic reviews, through a bibliographical search carried out in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, BVS, Cochrane Library databases. Predefined search strategies were followed, and the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: Two systematic reviews were selected, which met the eligibility criteria. CBD when compared to placebo reduce 50% of seizures for refractory epilepsy (RR 1.69, IC 95% [1.20 2.36]), for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome the RR was foi 2.98 (IC 95%, 1.83 - 4.85) and for Dravet Syndrome o RR FOI 2.26 (IC 95% ,1.38 - 3.70). CBD may result in appetite decrease using high doses (RR = 2.10, 95% IC [0.96 4.62], with no statistical difference. Conclusion: Two recent systematics, CBD, when compared to placebo, presented 50% of seizures for refractory epilepsy and severe syndromes. However, there are few clinical trials published in the area
Asunto(s)
Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Dronabinol/uso terapéutico , Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Eficacia , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamiento farmacológico , AnticonvulsivantesRESUMEN
Biofilm production is an important mechanism that allows microbes to escape host defences and antimicrobial therapy. Vancomycin has been used largely for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Here, we determined the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) for 82 Staphylococcus species isolated from central venous catheters (CVC). Our results showed that the 41 strong and moderate-biofilm-producing isolates presented a higher MBEC/MIC ratio for vancomycin than the 24 weak-biofilm-producing isolates, illustrating the importance of biofilm production ability and the difficulty in treating biofilm-related infections. The MBEC was significantly higher in moderate-biofilm-producing isolates than in weak-biofilm-producing isolates (p < 0.001) and in strong-biofilm-producing isolates than in weak-biofilm-producing isolates (p = 0.001). The correlation between the MIC and the MBEC was poor. Based on our results, we recommend that bacterial biofilms be suspected in all cases of CVC infection.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus/clasificación , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Biofilm production is an important mechanism that allows microbes to escape host defences and antimicrobial therapy. Vancomycin has been used largely for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. Here, we determined the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) for 82 Staphylococcus species isolated from central venous catheters (CVC). Our results showed that the 41 strong and moderate-biofilm-producing isolates presented a higher MBEC/MIC ratio for vancomycin than the 24 weak-biofilm-producing isolates, illustrating the importance of biofilm production ability and the difficulty in treating biofilm-related infections. The MBEC was significantly higher in moderate-biofilm-producing isolates than in weak-biofilm-producing isolates (p < 0.001) and in strong-biofilm-producing isolates than in weak-biofilm-producing isolates (p = 0.001). The correlation between the MIC and the MBEC was poor. Based on our results, we recommend that bacterial biofilms be suspected in all cases of CVC infection.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Antibacterianos , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Staphylococcus , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Biopelículas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus , Staphylococcus , Staphylococcus/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to use a practical method to determine the minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of vancomycin and to compare the MBEC with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing isolates of staphylococci. Forty Staphylococcus spp. isolates from central venous catheter, from distinct patients, were selected for this study. The vast majority (28/30) of isolates which were biofilm-producing, presented high MBEC values (≥8 µg/mL) and could be considered as non-susceptible to vancomycin. All non-biofilm-producing isolates presented low MBEC (≤2 µg/mL) and were susceptible to vancomycin, according to CLSI breakpoints. While the MBEC and MIC values for biofilm-producing isolates differ significantly, the MBEC and MIC values for non-biofilm producers were the same. The method we have used proved to be a feasible and rapid technique to measure MBEC of Staphylococcus spp. biofilms. The method presented herein might be an alternative tool to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility in the biofilm mode of growth; the MBEC may be a more appropriate approach to correlate the susceptibility in vitro with clinical outcome resulting from the treatment of Staphylococcus spp. infection.