RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have evolved dramatically in the past decade. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for moderate to severe CDI. However, controlled comparative data pertaining to mild CDI is lacking. Furthermore, the potential impact of vancomycin treatment on subsequent vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) isolation remains unknown. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was executed at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, from 2013 to 2015. Adult patients (>18 years) with a first episode of acute CDI, determined per pre-established criteria, were enrolled. The efficacy of vancomycin vs. metronidazole among patients with mild CDI, and the independent association of oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI and later (up to 18 months) VRE isolation, was analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with CDI were enrolled. The majority were elderly (75%), and 56% had moderate to severe disease. Among 75 patients with mild disease, no differences were observed in terms of clinical outcomes between vancomycin or metronidazole treatment. Metronidazole remained non-inferior even after incorporating a prediction score to control for confounders associated with being a "vancomycin case". In multivariable analysis, oral vancomycin treatment during the acute CDI was the strongest independent predictor for later isolation of VRE (aOR=74, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that metronidazole should remain the recommended treatment of choice for mild CDI, due to clinical non-inferiority and an apparent association between vancomycin therapy and subsequent VRE isolation on an individual patient level analysis.