RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to compare posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements of the medial tibial plateau (MTP) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT) to determine the agreement of measurement between imaging modalities. METHODS: Patients aged 15-65 years with concurrent MRI and CT imaging were initially included. Knees with significant arthrosis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade >2), proximal tibia fracture, or artifact obscuring visualization were excluded. Two independent raters measured PTS of the MTP and LTP on paired MRI and CT. Interrater and intrarater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intermethod agreement was assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman analyses. An acceptable Bland-Altman limit of agreement (LOA) was set at ±2°, requiring 95% of measurement differences between imaging modalities to fall between ±2° for an acceptable level of agreement. RESULTS: 46 knees in 45 patients met final inclusion criteria. Interrater reliability was good for MRI (ICC 0.78-0.83) and moderate-to-good for CT (ICC 0.64-0.80) studies. Intrarater reliability was moderate-to-excellent (ICC 0.64-0.94). Intermethod agreement between MRI and CT was poor at the MTP (ICC 0.34-0.42) and moderate at the LTP (ICC 0.59-0.70). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated high variability of PTS measurements between MRI and CT: 0.16° (95% LOA -6.10-6.41°) for MTP for Rater 1; 0.22° (95% LOA -5.01-5.45°) for LTP for Rater 1; -0.95° (95% LOA -7.22-5.33°) for MTP for Rater 2; -0.99° (95% LOA -6.48-4.85°) for LTP for Rater 2, with only 47.83 to 60.87% of measurement differences falling within the predetermined acceptable LOA of ±2°. CONCLUSION: Although the interrater and intrarater reliability was moderate-to-excellent, the degree of agreement between PTS measurements on MRI and CT was highly variable at both medial and lateral plateaus. Although some variability may have been due to the study's limitations, PTS measurements at individual plateaus may not be interchangeable between MRI and CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify a cohort of isolated medial tibial plateau fractures treated with surgical fixation and to categorize them by Moore and Wahlquist classifications in order to determine the rate of complications with each fracture morphology and the predictive value of each classification system. We hypothesized there would be high rates of neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, and complications overall with a higher incidence of neurovascular injury in Moore type III rim avulsion fractures and Wahlquist type C fractures that enter the plateau lateral to the tibial spines. METHODS: Patients who presented to six Level I trauma centers between 2010 and 2021 who underwent surgical fixation for isolated medial tibial plateau fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Data including demographics, radiographs, complications, and functional outcomes were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty isolated medial tibial plateau fractures were included. All patients were classified by the Wahlquist classification of medial tibial plateau fractures, and 139 patients were classifiable by the Moore classification of tibial plateau fracture-dislocations. Nine percent of fractures presented with neurovascular injury: 5 % with isolated vascular injury and 6 % with isolated nerve injury. There were no significant differences in neurovascular injury by fracture type (Wahlquist p = 0.16, Moore p = 0.33). Compartment syndrome developed in two patients (1.3 %). The average final range of motion was 0.8-122° with no difference by Wahlquist or Moore classifications (p = 0.11, p = 0.52). The overall complication rate was 32 % without differences by fracture morphology. The overall rate of return to the operating room (OR) was 25 %. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated medial tibial plateau fractures often represent fracture-dislocations of the knee and should receive a meticulous neurovascular exam on presentation with a high suspicion for neurovascular injury. No specific fracture pattern was found to be predictive of neurovascular injuries, complications, or final knee range of motion. Patients should be counseled pre-operatively regarding high rates of return to the OR after the index surgery.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/fisiopatología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Síndromes Compartimentales/etiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos , Radiografía , Fracturas de la Meseta TibialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Realignment osteotomy performed concomitantly with cartilage restoration typically requires early restricted weightbearing and can add significant morbidity, potentially leading to an increased risk of early perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the 30-day complication rates after isolated cartilage restoration (ICR) versus concomitant cartilage restoration and osteotomy (CRO) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. DESIGN: NSQIP registries between 2006 and 2019 were queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients undergoing ICR (autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transfer, or osteochondral allograft transplantation) and CRO (with concomitant high tibial osteotomy, distal femoral osteotomy, and/or tibial tubercle osteotomy). Complications rates between treatment groups were compared using multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for sex, age, steroid use, and respiratory status. RESULTS: A total of 773 ICR and 97 CRO surgical procedures were identified. Mean patient ages were 35.9 years for the ICR group and 31.2 years for the CRO group. Operative time was significantly longer in the CRO group (170.8 min) compared with the ICR group (97.8 min). Multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant differences in rates of PE, VTE, and all-cause readmission between the ICR and CRO groups. No events of wound disruption, SSI and reoperation were found in the CRO group, while the ICR group was characterized by low rates of wound disruption, reoperation, and SSI (<1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support concomitant osteotomy with cartilage restoration when appropriate and aid surgeons in the preoperative counseling of patients undergoing cartilage restoration treatment.
RESUMEN
Background: Postoperative knee arthrofibrosis is a common and potentially detrimental complication affecting knee function and gait. Several cohort studies have reported good outcomes after arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Purpose: To review the literature assessing the efficacy and complications of arthroscopic LOA and MUA for postoperative arthrofibrosis of the knee and evaluate whether any relevant subgroups are associated with different clinical presentation and outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies published from January 1, 1990, to April 1, 2021, were identified through a search of the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All studies included in this analysis included pre- and postoperative range of motion measurements for their treated patients. Studies reporting outcomes for patients with isolated cyclops lesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were excluded. Results: Eight studies comprising 240 patients were included. The mean time from index surgery to arthroscopic LOA and MUA was 8.4 months, and the mean postoperative follow-up was at 31.2 months. All studies demonstrated a significant improvement (41.6°) in arc of motion after arthroscopic LOA. Clinically significant improvements in outcome measures, including the International Knee Documentation Committee, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, were reported after arthroscopic LOA across all applicable studies. Of 240 patients, a single complication (synovial fistula) occurred after LOA and MUA, which resolved without intervention. Conclusion: The results of this review indicated that arthroscopic LOA and MUA is a safe and efficacious treatment for postoperative arthrofibrosis of the knee.
RESUMEN
Knee articular cartilage defects can result in significant pain and loss of function in active patients. Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation offers a single-stage solution to address large chondral and osteochondral defects by resurfacing focal cartilage defects with mature hyaline cartilage. To date, OCA transplantation of the knee has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and long-term survivorship. However, significant variability still exists among clinicians with regard to parameters for graft acceptance, surgical technique, and rehabilitation. Technologies to optimize graft viability during storage, improve osseous integration of the allograft, and shorten recovery timelines after surgery continue to evolve. The purpose of this review is to examine the latest evidence on treatment indications, graft storage and surgical technique, patient outcomes and survivorship, and rehabilitation after surgery.
RESUMEN
Orthopedic surgeons are obtaining Master of Business Administration (MBA) degrees at an increasing rate. This study aimed to identify the motivations, trends, and perceived value of the MBA degree for these dual degree surgeons. A total of 157 orthopedic surgeons with both MD and MBA degrees were surveyed with a 19-item questionnaire to identify surgeons' motivations for obtaining an MBA degree and the perceived value of the degree. A total of 66 responses (42%) were received. Most respondents (89.4%) viewed the MBA degree as either extremely valuable or valuable. Prior to obtaining an MBA, 71.9% of dual degree surgeons dedicated time to administrative duties outside of the clinic. This number increased to 98.4% after receiving an MBA (p < 0.001). With the growing number of surgeons pursuing MBA degrees, there is a decrease in the time spent in the clinical role suggesting that either the non-clinical burden is increasing, or surgeons choose to re-allocate their time. Despite the high direct costs of an MBA, a majority of orthopedic surgeons perceived the MBA degree as a valuable investment they would pursue again.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medial epicondylitis (ME) is characterized as an overuse injury resulting in pathological alterations of the common flexor tendon at the elbow. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently become of interest in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions as an alternative to operative management. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of recalcitrant type 1 ME after treatment with either PRP or surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: To compare the 2 methods of treatment, we performed a retrospective review of 33 patients diagnosed with type 1 ME from 2006 to 2016 with a minimum clinical follow-up of 1 year who had failed an initial nonoperative treatment program of injections, medication, topical creams, and/or physical therapy. Overall, 15 patients were treated with a series of 2 leukocyte-rich PRP injections, and 18 patients were treated with surgery. Outcome measures included time to pain-free status, time to full range of motion (ROM), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). Each patient had at least 1-year follow-up. They were then contacted by telephone to determine final scores at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Unsuccessful outcomes were determined by the Nirschl grading system and failure to reach pain-free status, achieve baseline ROM, or return to previous activity. RESULTS: The mean final follow-up was 3.9 years. A statistically significant improvement was noted in both time to full ROM (42.3 days for PRP vs 96.1 days for surgery; P < .01) and time to pain-free status (56.2 days for PRP vs 108.0 days for surgery; P < .01). Successful outcomes were observed in 80% of patients treated with PRP and 94% of those treated operatively (P = .37). No significant difference was found in return-to-activity rates, overall successful outcomes, MEPS scores, or OES scores. CONCLUSION: In this case series, the use of PRP showed clinically similar outcomes to those of surgery in recalcitrant type 1 ME. PRP can be considered as an alternative to surgery in the treatment of recurrent ME, with an earlier time to full ROM and time to pain-free status compared with surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been described for surgical treatment of recalcitrant medial epicondylitis (ME). No single technique has yet to be proven the most effective. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a double-row repair for ME. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 31 consecutive patients (33 elbows) treated surgically for ME with a minimum clinical follow-up of 2 years. All patients were initially managed nonoperatively with anti-inflammatories, steroid injections, topical creams, and physical therapy. Outcome measures at final follow-up included visual analog scale (VAS) scores (scale, 0-10), time to completely pain-free state, time to full range of motion (FROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS), and Oxford Elbow Scores (OES). Patients were contacted by telephone to determine current functional outcomes, pain, activity, functional limitations, and MEPS/OES. Successful and unsuccessful outcomes were determined by the Nirschl grading system. RESULTS: The mean clinical and telephone follow-up periods were 2.3 and 3.6 years, respectively, and 31 of 33 (94%) elbows were found to have a successful outcome. The mean VAS improvement was 4.9 points, from 5.8 preoperatively to 0.9 postoperatively (P < .001). The mean MEPS and OES at final follow-up were 95.1 and 45.3, respectively. The mean time to pain-free state and time to FROM were 87.4 and 96 days, respectively. Unlike prior studies, no difference in outcome was found between those with and without ulnar neuritis preoperatively (P = .67). CONCLUSION: A double-row repair is effective in decreasing pain and improving the overall function for recalcitrant ME. Uniquely, the presence of preoperative ulnar neuritis was associated with higher patient-reported preoperative pain scores but not with poor outcomes using this protocol.
RESUMEN
Transient arterial injury is a common complication encountered in the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures, often presenting as a pulseless hand that appears well perfused, also known as the "pink, pulseless hand." Arterial injuries in pediatric humeral shaft fractures, on the other hand, are exceedingly rare, especially in closed fractures. The authors report a rare case of a humeral shaft fracture presenting as a pink, pulseless hand. Although this complication was initially managed according to supracondylar protocol, the patient's neurologic status deteriorated. This prompted vascular assessment with computed tomography angiography, revealing a complete occlusion of the brachial artery. At this more proximal level, there is significant risk for compromise of the collateral circulation. The patient was eventually treated successfully with open reduction of the fracture followed by brachial artery repair. Although watchful waiting may be appropriate in the management of this entity for supracondylar fractures, more aggressive management was indicated for this patient because of the occlusion occurring prior to the bifurcation of the brachial artery. The lack of collateral circulation makes improvement in this injury pattern unlikely. This report emphasizes that suspected vascular injury following humeral shaft fractures should be evaluated with computed tomography angiography. If an occlusion is identified, it should be treated aggressively with immediate open fracture reduction and evaluation by a vascular team for possible repair vs grafting. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e279-e281.].