RESUMEN
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), in the polymeric form, have been used extensively in functional textiles, including firefighter's turnout gear (e.g., jackets and pants), where PFAS are applied to confer oil and water resistance. However, growing concerns over the persistence, potential toxicity, and environmental impact of PFAS have prompted a thorough assessment of potential exposure pathways. Here, we report the emission of PFAS from three firefighter turnout gear jackets at 38 °C. Volatile emissions from the three layers (outer layer, moisture barrier, and thermal liner) were collected onto sorbent tubes via dynamic headspace sampling using a micro-scale chamber device kept at 38 °C for one hour. The emission was characterized using thermal desorption (TD) coupled to two-dimensional gas chromatography - time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOF MS). The enhanced separation capacity of GC×GC was essential due to the high number of compounds present in each sample, especially for the fabrics from used turnout gear jackets. Based on the filtering expressions, including two-dimensional retention time (1tr and 2tr) and PFAS diagnostic fragment ions (m/z 69, 95, and 131), fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and fluorotelomer acrylates were identified using standards and spectral matching with the NIST database. After conducting a non-targeted tile-based workflow, jackets (both used and unused) and layers were compared, resulting in the identification of the top 15 discriminating features from over 400 chromatographic peaks. Finally, preliminary FTOH emission experiments showed some usage and layers trends that are aligned with those reported using solvent extraction. Highest levels of FTOHs were found in the moisture barrier, followed by the outer layer and the thermal liner. Older jackets emitted higher levels of 8:2 FTOH and 10:2 FTOH than a newer jacket. In contrast, a newer jacket used for one year had emissions containing higher levels of 6:2 FTOH. Investigating routes of exposure and identifying new PFAS targets are critical steps in evaluating the environmental and health impacts of these persistent chemicals.
Asunto(s)
Fluorocarburos , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Textiles , Textiles/análisis , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Fluorocarburos/análisis , Fluorocarburos/químicaRESUMEN
The abundance and composition of matrix compounds in fire debris samples undergoing ignitable liquid residue analysis frequently leads to inconclusive results, which can be diminished by applying comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC). Method development must be undertaken to fully utilize the potential of GC × GC by maximizing separation space and resolution.. The three main areas to consider for method development are column selection, modulator settings and parameter optimization. Seven column combinations with different stationary phase chemistry, column dimensions and orthogonality were assessed for suitability based on target compound selectivity, retention, resolution, and peak shapes, as well as overall peak capacity and area use. Using Box-Behnken design of experimentation (DoE), the effect of modulator settings such as flow ratio and loop fill capacity were evaluated using carbon loading potential, dilution effect, as well as target peak amplitude and skewing effect. The run parameters explored for parameter optimization were oven programming, inlet pressure (column flow rate), and modulation period. Comparing DoE approaches, Box-Behnken and Doehlert designs assessed sensitivity, selectivity, peak capacity, and wraparound; alongside target peak retention, resolution, and shape evaluation. Certified reference standards and simulated wildfire debris were used for method development and verification, and wildfire debris case samples scrutinized for method validation. The final method employed a low polarity column (5% diphenyl) coupled to a semi-polar column (50% diphenyl) and resulted in an average Separation Number (SN) exceeding 1 in both dimensions after optimization. Separation Numbers of 18.16 for first and 1.46 for second dimension without wraparound for compounds with at least four aromatic rings signified successful separation of all target compounds from varied matrix compositions and allowed for easy visual comparison of extracted ion profiles. Mass spectrometry (MS) was required during validation to differentiate ions where no baseline separation between target compounds and extraneous matrix compounds was possible. The resulting method was evaluated against ASTM E1618 and found to be an ideal routine analysis method providing great resolution of target compounds from interferences and excellent potential for ILR classification within a complex sample matrix.
Asunto(s)
Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Técnicas de Dilución del Indicador , Espectrometría de MasasRESUMEN
In this study, we introduce a simple three-step workflow for a universally applicable RI system, to be used in GC×GC analysis of ignitable liquid residue (ILR) for arson investigations. The proposed RI system applies a combination of two well-established GC RI systems: non-isothermal Kovats (K) index in the first dimension and Lee (L) index in the second dimension. The proposed KLI RI system showed very good correlations when compared with predicted values and existing RI systems (r2 = 0.97 in first dimension, r2 = 0.99 in second dimension) and was valid for a wide range of analyte concentrations and operational settings (coefficient of variance (CV) < 1% in first dimension, < 10% in second dimension). Using the KLI RI, an ILR classification contour map was created to assist with the identification of ILR types within ASTM E1618. The contour map was successfully applied to neat fuels and a fire scene sample, highlighting the application to wildfire investigation. Standardizing the RI process and establishing acceptable error margins allows the exploration and comparison of comprehensive data generated from GC×GC analysis of ILRs regardless of location, time, or system, further enhancing comprehensive and tenable chemometric analyses of samples. Overall, the KLI workflow was inexpensive, quick to apply, and user-friendly with its simple 3-step design.