RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown that subclinical, microembolic infarcts result in long-term cognitive changes. Whereas both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) have potential for microembolic events, CAS has been shown to have a larger volume of infarct. We have previously shown that large-volume infarction is associated with long-term memory deterioration. The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors that trend toward higher embolic volumes in both procedures. METHODS: A total of 162 patients who underwent carotid revascularization procedures were prospectively recruited at two separate institutions. Preoperative and postoperative brain magnetic resonance images were compared to identify procedure-related microinfarcts. A novel semiautomated approach was used to define volumes of infarcts for each patient. Patient-related factors including comorbidities, symptomatic status, and medications were analyzed. Tweedie regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with procedure-related infarct volume. Variables with an unadjusted P value of ≤ .05 were included in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There were 80 CAS and 82 CEA procedures performed and analyzed for the data set; 81% of CAS patients had procedure-related new infarcts with a mean volume of 388.15 ± 927.90 mm3 compared with 30% of CEA patients with a mean volume of 74.80 ± 225.52 mm3. In the CAS cohort, increasing age (adjusted coefficient ± standard error, 0.06 ± 0.02; P < .01) and obesity (1.14 ± 0.35; P < .01) were positively correlated with infarct volume, whereas antiplatelet use (-1.11 ± 0.33; P < .001) was negatively correlated with infarct volume. For the CEA group, diabetes (adjusted coefficient ± standard error, 1.69 ± 0.65; P < .01) was identified as the only risk factor positively correlated with infarct volume, whereas increasing age (-0.10 ± 0.05; P = .03) was negatively correlated with infarct volume. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for CAS- or CEA-related infarct volumes are identified in our study. Although the result warrants further validation, this study showed that advanced age, obesity, and diabetes independently predicted volume of microinfarcts related to CAS and CEA. These data provide valuable information for patient factor-based risk stratification and preoperative consultation for each procedure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Embólico/etiología , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Accidente Cerebrovascular Embólico/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Microembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. METHODS: Patients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Embolia Intracraneal/etiología , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Embolia Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Although rhinovirus (RV) infections can cause asthma exacerbations and alter lower airway inflammation and physiology, it is unclear how important bronchial infection is to these processes. To study the kinetics, location, and frequency of RV appearance in lower airway tissues during an acute infection, immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were used to analyze the presence of virus in cells from nasal lavage, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushings, and biopsy specimens from 19 subjects with an experimental RV serotype 16 (RV16) cold. RV was detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis on cells from nasal lavage and induced sputum samples from all subjects after RV16 inoculation, as well as in 5 of 19 bronchoalveolar lavage cell samples and in 5 of 18 bronchial biopsy specimens taken 4 days after virus inoculation. Immunohistochemistry detected RV16 in 39 and 36% of all biopsy and brushing samples taken 4 and 15 days, respectively, after inoculation. Infected cells were primarily distributed in discrete patches on the epithelium. These results confirm that infection of lower airway tissues is a frequent finding during a cold and further demonstrate a patchy distribution of infected cells, a pattern similar to that reported in upper airway tissues.