RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In orthodontics, white spot lesions are a persistent and widespread problem caused by the demineralization of buccal tooth surfaces around bonded brackets. The remaining adhesive around the brackets leads to surface roughness, which might contribute to demineralization. The present in vitro study aimed to compare a conventional and a modern adhesive system (APC Flash-Free technology) for orthodontic brackets with regard to the adhesion of Streptococcus sobrinus, a leading caries pathogen. METHODS: This in vitro study included 20 premolar teeth and compared 10 APC Flash-Free adhesive-coated ceramic brackets (FF)with 10 conventionally bonded (CB) ceramic clarity brackets. Specimens were incubated in an S. sobrinus suspension for 3 h. To evaluate the bacterial formation, samples were analysed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Imaging software was used to quantify and statistically compare percentage values of colonization (PVC) in both groups' adhesion and transition areas. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in biofilm formation between the groups for the adhesive and transition areas. PVC in the adhesive area was approximately 10.3-fold greater for the CB group compared with the FF group (median: 3.2 vs 0.31; P < 0.0001). For the transition area, median PVC was approximately 2.4-fold greater for the CB group compared with the FF group (median: 53.17 vs 22.11; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significantly lower level of S. sobrinus formation around the FF bracket system than there was surrounding the conventionally bonded group. This study suggests that the FF adhesive bracket system can help reduce the occurrence of bacterial growth around orthodontic brackets.
Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Desmineralización Dental , Humanos , Diente Premolar , Cerámica , Biopelículas , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Ensayo de MaterialesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: White spot lesions are one of the most common side effects of orthodontic therapy with a multibracket appliance and may indicate a preliminary stage of caries, also known as initial caries. Several approaches may be utilized to prevent these lesions, such as reducing bacterial adhesion in the area surrounding the bracket. This bacterial colonization can be adversely affected by a number of local characteristics. In this context, the effects of excess dental adhesive in the bracket periphery were investigated by comparing a conventional bracket system with the APC flash-free bracket system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both bracket systems were applied to 24 extracted human premolars, and bacterial adhesion with Streptoccocus sobrinus (S. sobrinus) was performed for 24 h, 48 h, 7 d, and 14 d. After incubation, bacterial colonization was examined in specific areas by electron microscopy. RESULTS: Overall, significantly fewer bacterial colonies were found in the adhesive area around the APC flash-free brackets (n = 507 ± 13 bacteria) than the conventionally bonded bracket systems (n = 850 ± 56 bacteria). This is a significant difference (**p = 0.004). However, APC flash-free brackets tend to create marginal gaps with more bacterial adhesion in this area than conventional bracket systems (n = 265 ± 31 bacteria). This bacterial accumulation in the marginal-gap area is also significant (*p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: A smooth adhesive surface with minimal adhesive excess is beneficial for reducing bacterial adhesion but also poses a risk of marginal gap formation with subsequent bacterial colonization, which can potentially trigger carious lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To reduce bacterial adhesion, the APC flash-free bracket adhesive system with low adhesive excess might be beneficial. APC flash-free brackets reduce the bacterial colonization in the bracket environment. A lower number of bacteria can minimize white spot lesions in the bracket environment. APC flash-free brackets tend to form marginal gaps between the bracket adhesive and the tooth.