RESUMEN

Forty-one families with multiple cases of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL), or both are presented. The families were randomly collected from physicians, genetic counselors, and other sources. Medical records were collected and reviewed for all families. In 17 of the families, a parent and child with acute leukemia were identified; and in 15 of the pairs, the parent and child were of the same sex. Nine grandparent-grandchild affected pairs with AML-AML were identified, occurring in six families, and six of those pairs were also of the same sex. Anticipation was a common feature of these multigenerational pairs. Twenty families were identified with multiple siblings (none twins) with acute leukemia. This includes 16 sibling pairs and 4 sibling triples. The members of each sibling pair in the AML-AML group and in the B-ALL-B-ALL group were generally of roughly the same age. Curiously, this is not true of those in the AML-B-ALL group. Four of the 41 families had contributions to more than 1 family relationship category. Although inheritance in familial acute leukemia has usually been consistent with an autosomal dominant pattern, these data suggest that an X chromosome gene may be involved in some cases, perhaps in the pseudoautosomal region of the X chromosome as we have reported in familial Hodgkin lymphoma.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are hematopoietic neoplasms that arise from the same myeloid precursor cell. In addition, studies suggest a relationship between LCH and primary idiopathic myelofibrosis (MF). Furthermore familial LCH, AML, and MF have each been reported. METHODS: We examined more than 750 pedigrees of familial hematologic malignancies for evidence of familial LCH, AML, and/or MF and identified one family with all three neoplasms, which is presented here. FINDINGS: In four generations of this large family there are five cases of AML in three generations, two cases of LCH in two generations and three cases of MF in two generations. Anticipation of -18 and -6 years was present in the patients with MF, and -8 years in the patients with LCH. Anticipation was also identified between one AML patient pair in generations III and IV (-18 years) and three patients with AML in generations II, III, and IV (-5 years and -10 years). INTERPRETATION: This is the first report of familial LCH, AML, and MF in one family. The pedigree suggests a common basis for these entities, which is further suggested by the presence of anticipation in the pedigree.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Since the early 2000s, aid organizations and developing country governments have invested heavily in AIDS treatment. By 2010, more than five million people began receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART)--yet each year, 2.7 million people are becoming newly infected and another two million are dying without ever having received treatment. As the need for treatment grows without commensurate increase in the amount of available resources, it is critical to assess the health and economic gains being realized from increasingly large investments in ART. This study estimates total program costs and compares them with selected economic benefits of ART, for the current cohort of patients whose treatment is cofinanced by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. At end 2011, 3.5 million patients in low and middle income countries will be receiving ART through treatment programs cofinanced by the Global Fund. Using 2009 ART prices and program costs, we estimate that the discounted resource needs required for maintaining this cohort are $14.2 billion for the period 2011-2020. This investment is expected to save 18.5 million life-years and return $12 to $34 billion through increased labor productivity, averted orphan care, and deferred medical treatment for opportunistic infections and end-of-life care. Under alternative assumptions regarding the labor productivity effects of HIV infection, AIDS disease, and ART, the monetary benefits range from 81 percent to 287 percent of program costs over the same period. These results suggest that, in addition to the large health gains generated, the economic benefits of treatment will substantially offset, and likely exceed, program costs within 10 years of investment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By the end of 2011 Global Fund investments will be supporting 3.5 million people on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 104 low- and middle-income countries. We estimated the cost and health impact of continuing treatment for these patients through 2020. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Survival on first-line and second-line ART regimens is estimated based on annual retention rates reported by national AIDS programs. Costs per patient-year were calculated from country-reported ARV procurement prices, and expenditures on laboratory tests, health care utilization and end-of-life care from in-depth costing studies. Of the 3.5 million ART patients in 2011, 2.3 million will still need treatment in 2020. The annual cost of maintaining ART falls from $1.9 billion in 2011 to $1.7 billion in 2020, as a result of a declining number of surviving patients partially offset by increasing costs as more patients migrate to second-line therapy. The Global Fund is expected to continue being a major contributor to meeting this financial need, alongside other international funders and domestic resources. Costs would be $150 million less in 2020 with an annual 5% decline in first-line ARV prices and $150-370 million less with a 5%-12% annual decline in second-line prices, but $200 million higher in 2020 with phase out of stavudine (d4T), or $200 million higher with increased migration to second-line regimens expected if all countries routinely adopted viral load monitoring. Deaths postponed by ART correspond to 830,000 life-years saved in 2011, increasing to around 2.3 million life-years every year between 2015 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Annual patient-level direct costs of supporting a patient cohort remain fairly stable over 2011-2020, if current antiretroviral prices and delivery costs are maintained. Second-line antiretroviral prices are a major cost driver, underscoring the importance of investing in treatment quality to improve retention on first-line regimens.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Significant scale-up of donors' investments in health systems strengthening (HSS), and the increased application of harmonization mechanisms for jointly channelling donor resources in countries, necessitate the development of a common framework for tracking donors' HSS expenditures. Such a framework would make it possible to comparatively analyse donors' contributions to strengthening specific aspects of countries' health systems in multi-donor-supported HSS environments. Four pre-requisite factors are required for developing such a framework: (i) harmonization of conceptual and operational understanding of what constitutes HSS; (ii) development of a common set of criteria to define health expenditures as contributors to HSS; (iii) development of a common HSS classification system; and (iv) harmonization of HSS programmatic and financial data to allow for inter-agency comparative analyses. Building on the analysis of these aspects, the paper proposes a framework for tracking donors' investments in HSS, as a departure point for further discussions aimed at developing a commonly agreed approach. Comparative analysis of financial allocations by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the GAVI Alliance for HSS, as an illustrative example of applying the proposed framework in practice, is also presented.

Asunto(s)