RESUMEN
Intralymphatic histiocytosis (ILH) is a rare cutaneous condition initially described in 1994 by O'Grady et al. It often appears as a red to violaceous, livedoid patch or plaque usually on the extremities. We present a 71-year-old female with a history of psoriasis, 50 pack years smoking and recent Legionnaires disease who came to us complaining of a red to violaceous, blanching, edematous, mildly tender lesion covering the left lower lip and extending to the chin and anterior neck. After multiple biopsies, ILH was confirmed and the patient was initially started on tacrolimus 0.1% ointment b.i.d., but there was no response. Then, she was started on oral pentoxifylline and intermittent topical steroids, as well as continuing the topical tacrolimus. There was again no response, so now she is taking a TNF-É inhibitor as it appears to be a granulomatous process. These ILH cases are very rare and there is limited literature that describes one treatment as a cure. Treatment of ILH is very difficult, but several different therapies have been reported with varying success. If the disease is secondary to an underlying inflammatory disease or malignancy, then treatment of the primary disorder can lead to resolution of the ILH.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary surgical treatment of patients with early T-classification (T1-T2) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased. We sought to determine how often these patients receive postoperative chemoradiation (CRT). METHODS: Patients with T1-T2 OPSCC in the National Cancer Database who underwent primary surgery were evaluated for receipt of postoperative CRT. Postoperative CRT use was examined among patients with high risk factors (positive margins and/or extracapsular spread [ECS]), intermediate risk factors (negative margins, no ECS, and either pT3-4 and/or N2-N3), and no apparent risk factors. RESULTS: Of 4833 patients with T1-T2 OPSCC who underwent primary surgery, 43% had high risk pathologic factors, of whom only 63% received postoperative CRT. Another 31% had no apparent risk factors, of whom 16% nonetheless received postoperative CRT. On multivariable analysis, in addition to tumor and demographic factors, patients treated at community hospitals were more likely to receive postoperative CRT (O.R. 1.41 C.I. 1.18-1.87, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in postoperative CRT use indicates a lack of consensus and/or knowledge about its benefits and indications. Usage of postoperative CRT regardless of pathologic risk factors suggests an area where future efforts at implementation of best practices may be targeted.