RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hirayama disease (HD) is a rare, nonfamilial, self-limiting, progressive lower cervical myelopathy, resulting in debilitating distal upper-extremity motor deficits, mimicking high ulnar neuropathy, lower trunk brachial plexopathy, or C8-T1 radiculopathy. Although most literature focuses on pathophysiology and prevention of disease progression, there remains limited discussion regarding treatment to improve upper-extremity function in patients with stable disease. The upper-extremity manifestations of HD are reviewed along with surgical options for restoring hand function. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with HD who underwent reconstruction to improve hand function was undertaken. Demographic data, preoperative electrodiagnostic and electromyographic, and physical examination findings were collected. Outcome data involved postoperative grip, pinch, and functional assessment documented on clinical visits. Qualitative descriptions of the surgical techniques are described. RESULTS: Among six patients identified, four met the inclusion criteria and underwent tendon transfers and selected joint arthrodeses. All patients were diagnosed as teenagers, were right hand-dominant, and three were male. Unilateral symptoms were present in one patient and were bilateral in the rest. All patients were treated with tendon transfers for thumb opposition, grasp, anticlaw, and thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. All patients had postoperative grip strength improvement. The average follow-up was 3.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Hirayama disease is a rare disease often managed by spine surgeons and neurologists who may be unaware of options for restoring hand function deficits. Technical strategies and outcomes of improving hand function in HD have not been adequately described. Surgical options to improve hand function are tailored to the deficits and include tendon transfers, select joint arthrodeses, and/or tenodeses. Risk of disease progression and expectations following hand reconstruction must be managed carefully. TYPE OF STUDY LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare two sources of nerve graft for brachial plexus reconstruction: the denervated superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the sural nerve. Ninety-seven patients who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction with denervated SBRN nerve (24 patients with 24 grafts) or with sural nerve grafting (73 patients with 83 nerve grafts) were included. The two groups were compared with respect to postoperative muscle reinnervation, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores. In the SBRN group, only four (17%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. In the sural nerve group, 31 (37%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. Smoking had a negative impact on muscle recovery. Denervated SBRN grafts are associated with inferior outcomes when compared with sural nerve grafts in the treatment of traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):080-083, 2024).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Restoration of elbow flexion is a priority in treating adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. A tendon transfer is an ideal option for patients not candidates for reconstructive nerve surgery or free-functioning muscle transfer. For patients with a partial brachial plexus injury or a pan plexus injury with adequate recovered triceps function and loss of elbow flexion, a triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer is a nonmicrosurgical option to restore elbow flexion. The technique of triceps-to-biceps transfer in which the complete triceps tendon is transferred laterally, secured lateral to the radial tuberosity, and reinforced with suture to the biceps tendon is described.

RESUMEN

Serial physical examination is often required in the evaluation of brachial plexus injuries. (Noland, 2019) A comprehensive evaluation that includes a thorough history, electrodiagnostic evaluation, and imaging studies, in addition to physical examination, can provide valuable information about the location of the lesion, prognosis for recovery, and whether surgical intervention is necessary. After brachial plexus reconstruction, physical examinations are also performed to document clinical improvement and identify any residual issues. The videos included in this clinical examination techniques section demonstrate the muscle strength examination testing for the brachial plexus and offer best practices for documentation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Restoration of hand function after traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) remains a formidable challenge. Traditional methods such as nerve or free muscle transfers yield suboptimal results. Advancements in myoelectric prostheses, characterized by novel signal acquisition and improved material technology, show promise in restoring functional grasp. This study evaluated the ability of adults with a BPI injury to control an externally powered prosthetic hand using nonintuitive signals, simulating the restoration of grasp with a myoelectric prosthesis. It also assessed the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation in guiding treatment decisions. METHODS: A multidisciplinary brachial plexus team assessed adults with compromised hand function due to BPI. The feasibility of amputation coupled with fitting of a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp reconstruction was evaluated. Participants' ability to control a virtual or model prosthetic hand using surface electromyography (EMG) as well as with contralateral shoulder motion-activated linear transducer signals was tested. The patient's input and injury type, along with the information from the prosthetic evaluation, were used to determine the reconstructive plan. The study also reviewed the number of participants opting for amputation and a myoelectric prosthetic hand for grasp restoration, and a follow-up survey was conducted to assess the impact of the initial evaluation on decision-making. RESULTS: Of 58 subjects evaluated, 47 (81%) had pan-plexus BPI and 42 (72%) received their initial assessment within 1 year post-injury. Forty-seven patients (81%) could control the virtual or model prosthetic hand using nonintuitive surface EMG signals, and all 58 could control it with contralateral uniscapular motion via a linear transducer and harness. Thirty patients (52%) chose and pursued amputation, and 20 (34%) actively used a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp. The initial evaluation was informative and beneficial for the majority of the patients, especially in demonstrating the functionality of the myoelectric prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that adults with traumatic BPI can effectively operate a virtual or model myoelectric prosthesis using nonintuitive control signals. The simulation and multidisciplinary evaluation influenced informed treatment choices, with a high percentage of patients continuing to use the myoelectric prostheses post-amputation, highlighting its long-term acceptance and viability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

RESUMEN

A total of 26 adolescent patients were treated for scaphoid nonunion with a vascularized bone graft from either the medial femoral condyle or dorsal distal radius. There was an 85% union incidence, improved carpal alignment and a low incidence of complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shoulder function following spinal nerve grafting in pan-brachial plexus injuries(Pan-BPI) is not well described. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1)to evaluate shoulder abduction(ABD) and external rotation(ER) after grafting of viable spinal nerves to the suprascapular nerve(SSN), axillary nerve(AxN), or posterior division of the upper trunk(PDUT); and 2)to determine patient characteristics, injury severity/characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes. METHODS: 362 Pan-BPI reconstruction patients from a single institution were reviewed for those who underwent spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation between 2001 and 2018. Patient demographics, injury severity scores(ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups based on the recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER. RESULTS: 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. 17(41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14(34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10(24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger(18.6±5.56), had lower BMI(22.4±4.0), and lower ISS(10.5±6.24, p=0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age(OR:0.786, 95%CI:0.576,0.941) and ISS(OR:0.820, 95%CI:0.606-0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In Pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER following spinal nerve grafting to SSN and either AxN or PDUT. Age, BMI, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, BMI, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Pan-brachial plexus injury patients present a reconstructive challenge. The root analysis score, developed from parsimonious multivariable modeling of 311 pan-brachial plexus injury patients, determines the probability of having a viable C5 nerve based on four categories: positive C5 Tinel test, intact C5 nerve on computed tomography myelogram, lack of hemidiaphragmatic elevation, and absence of midcervical paraspinal fibrillations. METHODS: Root analysis scores were calculated for a separate cohort of patients with pan-brachial plexus injuries. Scores were validated by the presence or absence of a graftable C5 root, based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and concordance statistic of the scores were calculated. Patients were divided into three root analysis score cohorts: less than 50 (low), 50-75 (average), and 75-100 points (high) based on dividing the score into quartiles and combining the lowest two. The probability, sensitivity, and specificity of each cohort having an available C5 nerve were based on the intraoperative assessment. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 15 women and 65 men) were included. Thirty-one patients (39%) had a viable C5 nerve. The root analysis calculator had an overall accuracy of 82.5%, a receiver operating characteristic of 0.87, and a concordance statistic of 0.87, demonstrating high overall predictive value; 6.5% of patients with a score of less than 50 (94% sensitivity and 43% specificity), 16.1% of patients with a score of 50-75 (94% sensitivity and 67% specificity), and 77.4% of patients with a score of 75-100 (77% sensitivity and 90% specificity) had a graftable C5 nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The root analysis score demonstrated high accuracy and predictive power for a viable C5 nerve. In patients with a score of less than 50, the necessity of supraclavicular root exploration should balance patient factors, presentation timing, and concomitant injuries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries typically cause immediate loss of upper limb function. Timely multidisciplinary treatment in specialized centres often results in a useful helper arm. Both the patient and the surgical team can benefit from an open discussion to set realistic expectations. Surgical reconstruction is customized for each patient, considering their injury factors and functional objectives. Optimizing pain control, adherence to procedure indications and using meticulous surgical techniques help minimize the risk of failing to meet the patient's goals. The need for potential alternative treatment(s) if the desired result is not achieved should be detailed before the initial reconstruction. This review discusses late treatment options, including tendon transfers, joint fusions, free functioning muscle transfers and prosthetics, for managing the failed primary reconstruction of the traumatic adult brachial plexus.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Restoring elbow flexion is a reconstructive priority in patients with brachial plexus injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the results and assess factors contributing to outcomes of triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer in patients presenting with delayed or chronic upper brachial plexus injury. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries undergoing triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer at a single institution's multidisciplinary brachial plexus center between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The entire triceps tendon was transferred around the lateral aspect of the arm, secured to the radius with a tenodesis button, and reinforced with a side-to-side tendon transfer to the biceps tendon. Primary outcomes include the modified British Medical Research Council (mBMRC) elbow flexion strength and active elbow range of motion. RESULTS: Twelve patients (eight men and four women; mean age, 45.2 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 10.4 (range, 5-34) months. Nine patients achieved mBMRC ≥3. Five patients achieved mBMRC 4. Average active elbow flexion was 119°, with average extension deficit of 11°. There were three patients with unsatisfactory results, achieving mBMRC 2 elbow flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer is an excellent tendon transfer option for restoring elbow flexion in certain patients with an adequately functioning triceps muscle, who present with a delayed or chronic brachial plexus injury. Although most patients achieved mBMRC ≥3 elbow flexion, there was an expected permanent loss of elbow active extension with a residual elbow flexion contracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDS: In pan-brachial plexus injury patients, distinguishing between pre-ganglionic and post-ganglionic injuries is crucial to reconstructive planning. This study aimed to identify pre-operative factors that would accurately predict a reconstructible C5 spinal nerve. METHODS: Pan-brachial plexus injury patients from a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical examination, diagnostic imaging, and electrodiagnostic results were recorded. C5 viability was determined based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Univariate analysis identified significant factors for regression analysis. Multivariable parsimonious model was created using stepwise high performance logistic regression. RESULTS: 311 patients (mean age 29.9 years; 46 females, 265 males; Injury Severity Score 17.2) were included. 134 (43%) had a viable C5 and 50 (12%) patients had a viable C6 nerve. Intact C5 spinal nerve on CT myelogram (OR 5.4), positive Tinel's test (OR 2.6), M ≥ 4 rhomboid (OR 1.3) or M ≥ 4 serratus anterior (OR 1.4), and rhomboid needle EMG (OR 1.8) were predictive of having a viable C5 spinal nerve. The multivariable parsimonious stepwise model (AUC 0.77) included four factors: positive Tinel's test, intact C5 spinal nerve on CT myelogram, hemi-diaphragmatic elevation, and mid-cervical paraspinal fibrillations. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of pan-brachial plexus patients with major polytrauma, there was a 43% incidence of viable C5 spinal nerve. A positive Tinel's test (OR 2.1) and intact C5 spinal nerve on CT myelogram (OR 4.9) predicted a viable C5 nerve. In contrast, hemi-diaphragmatic elevation (OR 3.1) and mid-cervical paraspinal fibrillations (OR 2.92) predicted root avulsion.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic peroneal nerve injuries are typically associated with high-energy injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics and outcomes following surgical management of peroneal nerve injuries. METHODS: Patients evaluated at a single institution with peroneal nerve injuries between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Mechanism of injury, time to surgery, pre- and postoperative examinations, and operative reports were recorded. Satisfactory outcome, defined as the ability to achieve anti-gravity dorsiflexion strength or stronger following surgery, was compared between nerve grafting and nerve transfers in patients with at least 9 months of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had follow-up greater than 9 months after surgery, with an average follow-up of 3.8 years. Surgeries included neurolysis (n=5), direct repair (n=2), tibial motor nerve fascicle transfer to the anterior tibialis motor branch (n=18), or interposition nerve grafting using sural nerve autograft (n=12). At last follow-up, 59.5% (n=22) of patients had anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. Nineteen (51.4%) patients used an ankle-foot orthosis during all or some activities. In patients that underwent nerve grafting only across the peroneal nerve defect, 44.4% (n=4) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. In patients that had a tibial nerve fascicle transfer to the tibialis anterior motor branch of the peroneal nerve, 42.9% (n=6) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion at last follow-up. There was no statistical difference between nerve transfers and nerve grafting in postoperative dorsiflexion strength (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Peroneal nerve injuries frequently occur in the setting of knee dislocations and similar high-energy injuries. Nerve surgery is not universally successful in restoration of ankle dorsiflexion, with one-third of patients requiring an ankle-foot orthosis at mid-term follow-up. Patients should be properly counseled on the treatment challenges and variable outcomes following peroneal nerve injuries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Complete brachial plexus injuries are devastating injuries. A viable C5 spinal nerve can offer additional sources of axons and alter surgical treatment. We aimed to determine factors that portend C5 nerve root avulsion. Methods: A retrospective study of 200 consecutive patients with complete brachial plexus injuries at two international centers (Mayo Clinic in the United States and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan) was performed. Demographic information, concomitant injuries, mechanism, and details of the injury were determined, and kinetic energy (KE) and Injury Severity Score were calculated. C5 nerve root was evaluated by preoperative imaging, intraoperative exploration, and/or intraoperative neuromonitoring. A spinal nerve was considered viable if it was grafted during surgery. Results: Complete five-nerve root avulsions of the brachial plexus were present in 62% of US and 43% of Taiwanese patients, which was significantly different. Increasing age, the time from injury to surgery, weight, body mass index of patient, motor vehicle accident, KE, Injury Severity Score, and presence of vascular injury significantly increased the risk of C5 avulsion. Motorcycle (≤150cc) or bicycle accident decreased the risk of avulsion. Significant differences were found between demographic variables between the two institutions: age of injury, body mass index, time to surgery, vehicle type, speed of injury, KE, Injury Severity Score, and presence of vascular injury. Conclusions: The rate of complete avulsion injury was high in both centers. Although there are a number of demographic differences between the United States and Taiwan, overall the KE of the accident increased the risk of C5 avulsion.

RESUMEN

Stem cell therapy is rapidly evolving, with preclinical studies showing various stem cell types successfully promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. Despite the lack of clinical studies demonstrating efficacy and safety, the number of commercial entities marketing and promoting this treatment direct to patients is also increasing. We describe three adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients who had stem cell therapies prior to consultation in a multidisciplinary brachial plexus clinic. No functional improvement was noted at long-term follow-up despite claims reported by the commercial entities. Considerations and implications of stem cell application in BPI patients are reviewed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is a technique to reconstruct the proximal pole scaphoid nonunion associated with an intact dorsal and volar scapholunate ligament. This study aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent OAT for this indication. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent proximal pole scaphoid nonunion reconstruction with a femoral trochlea OAT was undertaken between 2018 and 2022. Patient demographics, scaphoid nonunion characteristics, surgery details, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were obtained. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent the procedure at an average of 18.2 months from injury. Four patients failed prior attempts at scaphoid union surgery, one of whom failed two prior surgeries. Four had no prior surgery. The average follow-up was 11.8 months. The postoperative wrist flexion-extension arc of motion was 125° or 87% of the contralateral wrist. Grip strength averaged 30.0 kg or 86% of the contralateral side. Adjusted grip strength for hand dominance was 81% of the contralateral side. All OATs healed. Computed tomography scan confirmed the union in 6 patients between 6 and 10 weeks. Two patients whose radiographs demonstrated OAT incorporation at the time of follow-up did not undergo advanced imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Osteochondral autograft transplantation is an attractive surgical reconstructive procedure for patients with proximal pole scaphoid nonunions associated with an intact scapholunate ligament. Osteochondral autograft transplantation mitigates the need for vascularized bone grafting, has a rapid time to osseous incorporation, and has a simple postoperative course in which patients can expect early union, near-full range of motion, and grip strength. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The phrenic nerve is commonly injured with trauma to the brachial plexus. Hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis may be well-compensated in healthy individuals at rest but can be associated with persistent exercise intolerance in some patients. This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography compared to intraoperative stimulation of the phrenic nerve for assessing phrenic nerve injury associated with brachial plexus injury. METHODS: Over a 21-year period, the diagnostic utility of three-view inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography for identification of phrenic nerve injury was determined by comparison to intraoperative phrenic nerve stimulation. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of phrenic nerve injury and having an incorrect radiographic diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients with inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography underwent intraoperative testing of phrenic nerve function. Phrenic nerve injury was present in approximately one-fourth of cases. Preoperative chest radiography had a sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive negative of 75%, and negative predictive value of 86% for identification of a phrenic nerve palsy. Only C5 avulsion was found to be a predictor of having an incorrect diagnosis of phrenic nerve injury on radiography. CONCLUSION: While inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography has good specificity for detecting phrenic nerve injuries, a high number of false negatives suggest that it should not be relied upon for routine screening of dysfunction after traumatic brachial plexus injury. This is likely multifactorial and relates to variation in diaphragm shape and position, as well as limitations regarding static image interpretation of a dynamic process.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aims: The benefit of MRI in the preoperative assessment of scaphoid proximal fragment vascularity remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare preoperative MRI findings to intraoperative bleeding of the proximal scaphoid. Methods: A retrospective review of 102 patients who underwent surgery for scaphoid nonunion between January 2000 and December 2020 at a single institution were identified. Inclusion criteria were: isolated scaphoid nonunion; preoperative MRI assessing the proximal fragment vascularity; and operative details of the vascularity of the proximal fragment with the tourniquet deflated. MRI results and intraoperative findings were dichotomized as either 'yes' or 'no' for the presence of vascularity. A four-fold contingency table was used to analyze the utility of preoperative MRI with 95% confidence intervals. Relative risk was calculated for subgroups to analyze the association between variables and MRI accuracy. Results: Preoperative MRI identified 55 proximal scaphoid fragments with ischaemia and 47 with vascularized proximal fragments. After the proximal fragment was prepared, the tourniquet was deflated and assessed for bleeding; 63 proximal fragments had no bleeding and 39 demonstrated bleeding. MRI was not reliable or accurate in the assessment of proximal fragment vascularity when compared with intraoperative assessment of bleeding. No patient or MRI factors were identified to have a statistical impact on MRI accuracy. Conclusion: Current preoperative MRI protocols and diagnostic criteria do not provide a high degree of correlation with observed intraoperative assessment of proximal fragment bleeding. While preoperative MRI may assist in surgical planning, intraoperative assessment remains the best means for assessing proximal fragment vascularity in scaphoid nonunion. Future efforts should focus on the development of objective measures of osseous blood flow that may be performed intraoperatively.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: A high school-aged right-handed adolescent boy presented with a 5-mo history of persistent proximal right arm weakness and numbness after an American football stinger injury without a documented history of a shoulder dislocation or humeral fracture. He developed diffuse deltoid muscle atrophy, persistent shoulder abduction weakness, and reduced pinprick sensation confined to the axillary distribution over 5 mos. Needle electromyography demonstrated dense fibrillation potentials and no voluntary activation in all three deltoid muscle heads, indicating a severe posttraumatic ruptured axillary mononeuropathy. The patient then underwent a complex three-cable sural nerve graft repair for attempted reinnervation of the axillary-innervated muscles. Isolated axillary nerve injuries are usually associated with anterior shoulder dislocations; however, a severe isolated persistent axillary mononeuropathy from a ruptured axillary nerve may occur in trauma patients without a clear history of shoulder dislocation. These patients may present with only mild persistent weakness of shoulder abduction. Electrodiagnostic testing to fully assess axillary nerve function should still be considered to identify patients with high-grade nerve injuries that may benefit from sural nerve grafting. The rapid recovery of our patient's initial symptoms with persistent severe axillary injury suggests a unique vulnerability of the nerve due to the neuroanatomy and possibly other factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A variety of approaches have been described to obtain rudimentary grasp after traumatic pan-brachial plexus injury in adults. The aim of this study is to evaluate hand prehension after a gracilis single-stage free functioning muscle transfer. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients who underwent gracilis single-stage free functioning muscle transfer for elbow flexion and hand prehension after a pan-plexus injury were included. All patients presented with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Postoperative finger flexion, elbow flexion strength, preoperative and postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores, secondary hand procedures, complications, and demographic characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients (74%) demonstrated active finger pull-through. Only six patients (25%) considered their hand function useful for daily activities. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved by 13.1 ± 13.7 ( P < 0.005). All patients were expected to require one secondary procedure (wrist fusion, thumb carpometacarpal fusion, and/or thumb interphalangeal fusion) because no extensor reconstruction was performed. These were performed in 89%, 78%, and 74% of patients, respectively. Four postoperative complications (hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, and skin paddle loss) occurred. No flap loss occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In pan-plexus injuries, the use of a gracilis single-stage free functioning muscle transfer is an alternative to the double free functioning muscle transfer procedure and contralateral C7 transfer, especially for patients who are unable to undergo two to three important operations in a short period of time. Further research and studies are required to improve hand function in these patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Asunto(s)